Datasets:

NahedAbdelgaber

/

evaluating-student-writing

like 1

In the first place ,attend classes at home can't benefit students because when their need help or have some question any teachers can be there. For example , I have a cousin who take classes at home but he never know anything because no body can help him when he have a question. While, always I tell him that if he have a problem I can help him or another option is that he don't taking classes at home anymore. Also he don't make friends because he do not go to the schools. I choose this option because a lot of student waste their time taking classes at home. I am agree that attend classes at home not have benefit.

likewise, attend classes at home can benefit students because their can sleep more. In my case, if a have the opportunity to take classes at home i'm happy because I love sleep a lot. For example,the twenty-five of the student get classes at home because don't like to make a friends or their believe that their can do the work along. The classes start early so in this way they do not have to wake up early. Also, if people sleep more their can be more healthy this is the reason because student like to take classes at home to be more healthy. I choose this option because is important remember that many students want to sleep more or get extra time because their have a job and is hard to them do two thing at the same time .For this reason many student choose take classes at home.

In addition,attend classes at home can benefit because student don't need to take bus or walk. For example,some student do not have to take bus because are more near to the school. In my case, I have to walk from my home to my schools sixteenth minutes every single day. when winter come and is so cold outside it's not good to walk in this temperature. while , this is the reason because students take classes at home although sometime can't benefit. Another reasons is that some students have to take the public buses so is take classes at home don't have to take bus. I choose this reason because many people forget that many time is not easy for the students do that.

Finally,everything have advantage and disadvantage because some schools think that students would benefit from being able to attend classes from home and some schools are disagree. Also some students work a lot so their can benefit with this opportunity. Although, attend classes at home is not the same thing like go to schools and receive help from teachers, students, etc. In addition, if some schools offer this opportunity have to think about it and look the best option.Cell Phones are a very controversial problem with today's society. Cell phones cause damage with our eyes and put our bodies at risk. Driving is already dangerous and many people die almost every day from car crashes, or car malfunctions. So adding a mobile device that already has so many disadvantages and makes your health worse, is just bad. Cell phones on an average can bring soreness of eyes, and blurred vision, and headaches. If that's not enough you can even get a type of an eye cancer.

Using Cell Phones are very dangerous and can cause serious issues while putting it with Driving. Drivers should be off their phone while operating a vehicle as such, no matter if it's a car, a truck, or a motorcycle, no driver should.

There are three reasons as to why I think drivers should not use a cell phone while driving but the first one is for the drivers' safety themselves. The drivers' safety is the most important. "Distracted Drivers", which means they are doing something else while not paying attention to the road, is one of the main causes of the accidents. 27% percent of adults admit to texting while driving, according to esurance. com, 24% percent Of fatal car crashes are adults are aged 30 to 39 were also involved with cell phone use. What I'm referring to this information for is because adults are supposed to be, or at least traditionally the responsible ones. You would think that they would put the phone down but no they text and drive or even talk on the phone while driving.

Which is putting their life at risk. If you are driving you are handling an over 40 ton machine which has a lot of speed on it, even for a truck. So when you add additional stuff like a text, which can wait until u get home or at a stop you'd rather, get yourself killed and most likely others. You're basically, if it's a fatal car crash then, killing yourself which is suicide.

You're taking yourself away from your family which is not right.

My next point is that you're not only taking yourself, but additionally your taking someone else away from their family. Which is murder, and murder is really bad especially if you live the car crash and you are the one who was on their phone, YOU will be sentenced to life in prison or maybe even worse just because YOU couldn't put the phone down. According to edgarsnyder. com, 390,000 injuries occur each year, just from using cellular devices while driving.

But this is the more disturbing fact, 11 teens are killed EVERY single day in the United States. That's a scary number and considering those are not just from people texting and driving but the innocent are killed. This is basically proof that cell phones are killing machines and should be inaccessible while operating a motor vehicle. Just imagine irresponsibly texting on your phone and not thinking of the safety of others. Then BOOM, you have just killed young boy or girl in their late teens driving home from a job or restaurant and whom may have had more people in their car.

Then the person parents have to hear that their child was killed due to your irresponsibility. It's just really sickening and depressing.

The third and final reason as to why cell phone use should not be allowed while driving is because it's just costly. Georgia passed the law on June 1st 2018. The fine will be 50$ and it will be doubled your second offense, according to USA Today's Article on the new founded law. Distracted driving is a main problem in today world. It has come to a certain point in today's America to where WE as a people need a law on not using our cellular devices. It should already be put in your mind after so many lives of young teens and adults' lives have been lost. But that's not good that you have to pay a fine and on top of that if you get caught in an accident, you will have to either be sued by the victim of the car crash or you will have to pay for expense on your car insurance. As an adult especially paying your bills and having to deal with a fine of $50. That is just unnecessary. According to CreditDonkey. com The average an adult spends money on groceries is $400. $400 is an absurd number for groceries, so just imagine getting sued and paying a fine and even on top of that paying car insurance. You my friend have just dug yourself in a huge hole that is going to take a while on.

To conclude, Using your cell phone is and should be banned and illegal. It is a hazard to others and should be taken with seriousness. You are not only putting yourself at risk but many others. Everyone knows that your phone is an addiction and it is just something we do off impulse but that is no excuse. Train your brain to say no and put the phone down. The text or phone call is not nearly as important as driving on the road is and I hope people will start to realize the importance of this topic and will consider it in their own lives, Will You? Many students choose not to participate in after school actives. This does not benefit them as they miss out on learning very important skills. If the principle were to mandate after school activities, it would be to the benefit of all students. It would give the people who do not already participate an excuse to do so. It might even turn out to be the best decision they had to make. This can earn them many life skills such as being a part of a team, learning to be a leader, or how to balance a more complicated schedule.

Extracurricular activities allow students to choose the activities that interest them, for example, if someone likes sports they might choose volleyball. If another student is more interested in theater, they might audition for the musical. The wide selection of activities would be good for students as they are figuring out their interests, as well. These students can try multiple different activities until they find the right one. Having an activity that is enjoyable is very important, as it makes you more inclined to learn. Therefore having an after school activity provides that inclination to learn.

This new or refreshed desire to learn, allows new skills to be taught. For example if a student are on a volleyball team and they enjoy the sport, then they will be more likely to learn to work with their teammates. Skills like working with others are very important in adult life. They are needed not just for a sports team but for any job. One example is, being on a development team. The team is trying to come up with a new way to manufacture cars, everyone on the team has their own idea. They have to work as a team in order to produce one, well fabricated idea. This requires them to be able to work as a team, just like a student might have to in their extracurricular activity.

One other skill that is easily acquired from after school programs is leadership. Many activities help with this, but the most prevalent is student council. Learning to lead classmates and peers can be of great assistance when looking for a job or getting a promotion. Most jobs that are high up in the company are jobs that require the ability to lead and manage people. Acquiring this skill at a young age could be very helpful for a person looking for this type of job.

The problem that most people have with after school programs is that it decreases the time for getting homework done on time. However, this can be a good thing. When a person takes an after school activity, they must learn how to balance their schedule. This is a very valuable skill that is used throughout a persons life. Learning to do this early makes such a difference as the person moves on to high school and likely university. Learning this skill before schedules get busier is incredibly important.

All of these reasons make it an unquestionable choice for schools to require extracurricular activities. The benefits of learning these skills are much more powerful than the minor cons that are brought forward. A required participation should be enforced, for the benefit of all students.Asking different people may lead to a better answer than just asking one person. Asking more people can help by getting then to say there opinion on the question your asking them so if you asked me what does 2+2 equal and i said 10 but if you asked another person the same question and they say it equals 4 you wold believe him because he is correct. You should also if you keep asking for people how to succeed youll get maybe a whole paragraph of advice but then that will help you if you keep viewing different perspectives of how people succeed in life.

Seeking multiple people for advice would make would be helpful sometimes but most of the time it is. Some good advice is that just keep on going or never stop trying because at the end there is going to be a reward and some of the bad one's would be stop trying you're never going to make it. You should as different people only f they gone trough and they have experience with it.

Another reason why you should ask multiple people for it is because some people maybe giving you the wrong advice so thats why it's helpful to ask other people that are similar to you because then they can give some some good advice that could be reliable to you. Reasons why you should ask more than person is because one persons advice could be like i was very passionate about my job and worked really hard to try to et it and i finally got the job and now the CEO of it. and the some bad one's is don't try to work because you can do what you love even tho you can do that but it can result of not a lot of money into your wallet but it sometimes will get you a lot of money and can afforrd what other people can afford.The article "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" mentions may things about all the problems with going to Venus. Then, it is said how those problems could be fixed. These are all to support the authors claim. From examining the risk vs. reward of going to mars for exploring that was used in the text and the simple soutions that have baffled the world for 3+ decades, it's clear that the author got through with the message he was trying to convey.

What I've learned fromt the text is that traveling to Venus for a fair amount of time could be a very momentus event in history, but it will be very arduous to reach that goal. There were several dangers listed; temperature, air pressure, lightning, volcanoes, etc. "While Venus is simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point of earth, it has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely". (Paragraph 1) These were also problems that were tackled by the author. He relenquishes all of the huge problems and proves that going to Venus could be worth it. Should all students have to participate in one extracurricular activity? Here are some things that might be helpful to get an answer. Some students might have other work to do from school, students may have other activities after school or outside of school, and students might become more stressed from extracurricular activities. Those are some things that might be helpful to answer if students must participate in an extracurricular activity.

First, Students might have other work from school that they have to finish at home or after school. Students might have homework, missing work, or late assignments from school that need to be completed on their own time. If students are not able to finish a certain assignment because of an extracurricular activity, it could possibly lower the students grade. If there is an extra class in school, students will most likely have more homework at the end of the day. Students need to finish other work outside of school.

Second, Students may have other activities after school or outside of school. Some students need to stay after school to retake a test, do late or missing work, or even just get extra help from a teacher. Students also need time outside of school to collect community service hours to graduate from high school. Students may have school or non-school related classes at home that they need to take such as a tutor, church/religion classes, etc. So students may need extra time for after school or non-school related activities.

Finally, students might become more stressed from another extracurricular activity. If some students have low grades, adding an extracurricular activity might overwhelm the student or stress him or her out. If students have a lot of work to complete, they might rush through everything instead of taking their time and being careful. And lastly, students might not be able to keep up with the extra class or work and their parents might keep pushing them on which will again, stress the student out. So students might become more stressed with an extracurricular activity.

So should students really have to participate in an extracurricular activity? I have come to a conclusion. I disagree because students might have other work from school to do at home, students may have other activities outside of school, and students might become more stressed. Those are the three main reasons why I disagree that students must participate in an extracurricular activity.Dear Mr. Senator,

There are many ways to go about elections of any kind, as you may know vey well seeing that you have been in one or more yourself. This country is about the will of the people supported by their government to excel and achieve the various goals they may very well have. Voting is one of those insintives people revieve, and how it is set up is an important part of that. We should keep relying on the Electoral College to succeed in keeping our country a democracy.

Having the Electoral College is a safe way to ensure that all people in every state get to voice their opinion while still keeping in mind the majority as a priority. As stated by author Richard A. Posner, people vote for a slate of electors, not the president, whom are entrusted to vote for the presidential candidate they represent. The number of electors is determined by the population of the state, which basically means the number of members in that state's House of Representatives and two for the Senate, as stated in Source 1: What Is the Electoral College? This ultimately would provide fair numbers for the overall count without making the smaller states feel insignificant.

Even with the smaller states being fairly included people argue that candidates do not pay attention to them and disreguard their overallvotes so we should switch to popular votes. These accusations may be true in a sense but what is to be expected if they dont account for as much or maybe they are already accounted for as "decided", as stated by Richard P. Would you campaign in a place like that? Especially since having elections be decided by popular votes could result in run-off elections to which no clear winner is evident, they would result in a tie, as included by Richard A. Posner. Having a tied election would end up giving the HOR overall election power, as presented in Source 1: What Is the Electoral College, so their arguement is not considerate of all possibly outcomes.

All in all, sticking with the Electoral College seems to be the best bet for our democratic country. Electors are trustworthy, with few faults, and the system is set up in a way that is fair to all. Keeping this system just making elections easy, fair, and helps to prevent ties and future headaches for all whom are involved Have you ever wondered what someone is feeling by just looking at their face? Now, scientist have discovered a new technology to read emotions. The new technology uses recognition of muscle movements in the face. This new technology would be valubale in a classroom with students because you could tell how the students really feeling, you could tell if they are faking emotions, and it could be a learning tool.

First, you could tell how the students are really feeling. In paragraph 9, the author states "According to the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them." This means if a teacher sees an upset student, the teacher can tell them to make a happy face and eventually the student won't be as upset. It would help everyone be happy because everyone will "... unconsciously imitate another person's facial expressions."

Second, it would help show if anyone is faking emotions. In paragraph 8, the author says "...these muscle clues are sometimes used to spot when a "smiling" politician or celebrity isn't being truthful." This would also be helpful with students in a classroom because if student his trying a student is trying to hide being upset a teacher could know and then ask them whats wrong. Also, it would work the other way too. The teacher would know if a student would be faking being upset.

Lastly, it could be used as a learning tool. It could be a way of showing how facial muscles work and the emotions that are shown by them. In paragraph 6, the author states " Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor." This shows that it would be able to help students learn based off of their emotions.

There many things in the new technology that would be valuable in a classroom with students. For instance, it help tell how students are feeling. Also it could tell if a student is faking a smile and is really upset. Finally, it would be a helpful learning tool by changing lessons by the students emotions. Next time you see a facial expression try telling what emotion that it applies to.Cars are the most common use of transportation is todays society, but can limiting car usage be beniftial to our citizens? While you read this i want you to think how this can benefit you. Have you ever considered walking over driving, maybe even biking over driving, if not i want you to consider it next time you go to the gym or wherever you go. Limiting our car usage can be done in many types pf ways, such as: walking, biking, or jogging. If we walk instead ov drive not only are we getting to where we need to be, but you also get a workout. Same as jogging and biking, as you can see limiting car usage isnt that bad becasue you can do your body a much needed favor and get some exercise. We all know how we complain about gas prices, so if you cut back on driving you wont have to worry about gas. These are just two of many ways we can limit our car usage.    Dear principal,

I believe that you should select your first policy. If students can have there phones out during free time and lunch periods than they will be less likely to use try and use the in class. During school kids complain that they are not able to use there cell phones at all in school, but if they could use them during free times than they could talk with friends then and not have a need to during class. Think of what would happen if you go with the second policy, students will try and talk to friends during your teachers classes. When the students use there cell phones in classes they worry more about number one, getting caught and number two being able to talk to there friends. Most schools worry that students that have internet capability will post mean things about other students on social networking sites. You cant stop students from posting it at there homes, so they will do it there instead so you cant prevent that from happening.

If you select the alternative policy, and not the first policy than students would not be allowed to have them of use at school at all. If they were not to be of use than students would make it a game or a competition to see who can text the longest without getting caught by the teacher. It would be better to have them at use in school because than students that want to learn can and the students that don't want to learn repeat the same classes until they pay attention enough to pass there class.

Not being able to have a cell phone out at any time of the school day would be a bad idea. Having cell phones out during free time in the day would be a much better selection. Having cell phones out during class is a bad idea, but during their free time is there free time to do anything they want that is school appropriate.In "The Challenge of Exploring Venus," the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit depsite the dangers it presents. The author uses strong details to support this claim throughout the article. Facts and statistics by NASA and other reliable sources are used to back the claims. The author stands by the opinion that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.

The author claims that the idea of inhabiting Venus is worthy due to its similarity to Earth. Paragraph 4 states, "Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth" (The Challenge of Exploring Venus). If Venus could've supported human life long ago, it is likely the planet still can. The scientific facts throughout this statement support the author's claim by having a reliable source of information, supporting the idea. Paragraph 4 reads, "Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters" (The Challenge of Exploring Venus). Venus already has Earth-like landscapes and other similar formations. This supports the author's idea of exploring Venus because it is so similar to Earth, the chances of survival are higher than any other planet.

Although Venus is analogous to Earth, there are slight differences of the two planets. Earth has average low and high temperatures, while the temperatures of Venus are more extreme. Paragraph 5 reads, "At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth. Solar power would be plentiful, and radiaton would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans" (The Challenge of Exploring Venus). As stated, the conditions would not be easy for humans, but survivable at the least. This supports the author's claim because this proves human life could be achieveable overall. This means there is a worthy reason to explore Venus; to discover another habitable planet. Along with successful life on Venus, our modern technology could also survive the planet. Paragraph 5 states, "Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape. Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground codnitions by staying up and out of their way" (The Challenge of Exploring Venus). Moreover, if airplanes are already in existence, new aircrafts would need to be slightly adjusted to suit the conditions of Venus. The author's claim is supported in this quote because this is another reason Venus is worth exploring. The technology needed is already almost perfect for the planet, therefore not a problem NASA would have to approach.

Some issues still remain for the exploration, however NASA has already started preparing solutions. The heated state of the planet may be an issue, but NASA is studying a resolution. Paragraph 7 reads, "For example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions" (The Challenge of Exploring Venus). This new technology created could lead to a long-lasting basis for human life, yet another reason exploring Venus is a brilliant idea. Modern technology is too fragile for the harsh heat of the planet, but with some older computers, that as well could survive on Venus. Paragraph 7 reads, "The thought of (mechanical) computers existing in those days may sound shocking, but these devices make calculations by using gears and levers and do not require electronics at all. Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible, and quick, but tend to be more delicate when it comes to extreme physical conditions" (The Challenge of Exploring Venus). This is yet another piece of technology on Earth and prepared for Venus. The author's claim is supported in this statement because it is a simple solution to technology on Venus. There are very few rebuttals that overcome the postive effects of pursuing Venus.

With all the easy fixes, solutions and prep planned for Venus, the author's claim is overwhelmingly supported. The author proved Venus is certainly a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. The positive outcomes outweigh the negatives in almost every aspect of this idea. There are multiple reasons presented in "The Challenge of Exploring Venus" that prove attempting to explore Venus has a more successful outlook than not. Throughout the article, the facts and claims highly support the author's claim of Venus being a worthy planet to pursue.The ozone layer is dissolving, there is no scientific question about it. The world is covered in pollution and in a million years the sun is supposed to swallow most of the planets in the solar system. If we need to flee our planet we need to find our best options and venus might be one of the best.

Venus is often referred to as ¨Earth´s twin¨ , it is about the same size and density, and contains many geographical features that are found on Earth. Many of the gases on this planet can be found on Earth or even be breathed out of your own body (CO2). Venus has many similarities to the Earth we love, learning as much as possible about Venus can help us in the long term. In the text the author talks of how Venus is right around the corner from us and how scientists are trying to build a spacecraft that will be able to withstand the tempretures of the hostile planet. If we humans can acsess information of the planet, when our ozone layer is completly perferated we may be able to switch planets for better living conditions.

Knowing what thrives around us and our planet is not particulary a bad thing. We may have to make adjustiments to our work ethic but it will eventually pay off in the scheme of things. What if there is more life out there? What if the movies you grew up watching are more nonfictional then first thought? Precious metals that can be used to fight wars on Earth are plentiful in surrounding planets and astroids, we just need to find them. Regardless the ozone layer of our planet will not hold forever, we need to know our options for our future progeny.

In conclusion the risks m ay be high but the reward is much higher, we need to explore our options as homosapiens and decide what the risks are worth. The stakes are set pretty high for us, and Venus just may be the answer we've been searching for.Dear principal ,

Community service has been part of many peoples lives in this world. Many people do community service to help others and better this world. Well i think doing community service should be a grown ups job to do not a student or any kid in the world. Students shouldn't be wasting their time i something they don't want do. They have a lot in head for ex. school , homework , siblings they have to take car of , after school programs , and sports they have to go to go to ! I understand doing community service is a good thing to do in this world , but kids shouldn't do it at all ! Some students should be require but not all ! If a student is failing a class or classes and needs points to pass their class require them to do community service. All students shouldn't to be require to do community service , only the people that need it. Its just a waste of time in a kids life , even though they know that they are doing something good in this world by helping others.Driverless cars, something you never thought you'd hear in the twenty-first century. Driverless cars can be an amazing thing, but also be an awful thing if used horribly. Aside from the name driverless cars are not particularly "driverless." Sure there are some good things and some bad things to driverless cars, but the bad things out weight the good things. Driverless cars should not become a thing in the state of Indiana or any other state.

Say you're driving down the road with your spouse and children, out of nowhere a car comes flying at you, not slowing down or anything. The car rams right into you, killing your spouse and children. As it turns out the car was a driverless car, it had malfunctioned and the manufacturer claims that since they were not driving the car that hit you and killed your family, they do not have to pay, so you go to the person who was in the vehicle, and they claim that since they technically were not driving it either, they also do not have to pay. So now here you are, hospital bills, funerals to plan, and no money to pay for any of it. You are the one who got hit, you are the one who lost everything that day, but because the car was "driverless" no one has to pay.

Even with the name "driverless," there still needs to be a driver while backing up, pulling into a driveway, or even through traffic jams. They try to get you with the name but really you still have to drive. Long day at work and you just want to go home and sleep? You are in your driverless car going home and all of the sudden boom, traffic jam. The car starts going crazy trying to get your attention but you are in a deep sleep. Then it happens, a car got tired of waiting and rammed into the back of you. You go to court and the judge puts you at fault because you should not have been sleeping while on the road, but your 'driverless' car was supposed to take care of it right?

As said in the tenth paragraph, they are continuing to work on the assumption that the problems will be solved, what if they don't get solved? You could have just got a brand new driverless car, under the assumption that the problems will be fixed, but what if they do not get fixed? Are you gonna be the next one to pass away or are you gonna be the next one to kill someone? You will never know because driverless cars are unpredictable. Driverless cars are not safe.

On the other hand, driverless cars can be very convient, you taking a long trip? No problem the car can drive most of it for you. You can sit and relax as the car is driving on the highways smoothly and perfectly. Driverless cars can get you the opportunity to be able to relax and not have the drive the whole way on your horrid trip. You can just sit back, relax, prop your feet up and it will be all fine.

Even with the minor plus sides to driverless cars, many deaths can still happen. Things can still malfunction no matter how many times tested. Not one piece of technology is perfect, so why should this "driverless" car be any different? Trick question, it is not. The car can malfunction just as well as any other piece of technology or even any other vehicle. They make the car sound like it will end up being perfect but it can not. Nothing is perfect, not even technology. Scientist say that a long time ago, Venus could have been the closest planet to how Earth is now. Even though it has become exstreamly dangerous and unhabitable on land. In "The Challenge of Exploring Venus," the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. The author in this article supports this idea very well by including details about how venus is dangerous.

The author begins by talking about Venus' history as a planet. He referrs to it as Earth's "twin" becasue of the planet's simmularities. The author says, "Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth." This sentence helps develope the authors point of how Earth and Venus are twins. Before this though, the author described how dangerous Venus has become and how it has almost become impossible for scientists to send a robot to the planet. Although, the author does say that it wouldn't be impossible to live there. The author also says that if a vehicle hovered about thirty or so miles above the suface, temperatures would be hot, but the pressure would be the accuivalent to sea level on Earth. After this, the author includes that solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not exceed Earth's levels. After this, the author moves on to show what scientists are doing to study the planet so that maybe one day we can live there, or atleast visit for a longer period of time. Scientists are studying older technologies that do not use electricity, but can calculate number and withstand harsh conditions. One example the author uses of this is the mechanical computer. After this, the author goes into detail about how it was used in world war two and how with the right metal, it could possibly withstand Venus' conditions. To finish off the paragraph, the author talks about how modern computer that use electricity are often more delicate, to show why the scientists are using this older technology. The author then wraps the imformation that has been said all together by saying, "Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by danger and doubts, but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation."