Datasets:

Marina-C

/

question-answer-Subject-Finance-Instruct

like 0

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what if i sell an stock that is going to give an stock dividend after the ex-date but before the payable date", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i know that in the case of cash dividends i will get the dividend as long as i bought the stock before the ex-date but what happens in the case of an stock dividend? this is same as cash dividends. you would receive the additional stock.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why doesn't graham consider gold as an investment?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "during graham's career, gold and currency were the same thing because of the gold standard. graham did not advise investing in currencies, only in bonds and stocks, the latter only for intelligent speculation. graham died a couple of years after nixon closed the gold window, ending the gold standard. gold may be thought of as a currency even today, as endowments and other investors use it as a store of value or for diversification of risks. however, currency or commodities investing does not seem graham-like. how could you reliably estimate intrinsic value of a currency or commodity, so that you can have a graham-like margin of safety after subtracting the intrinsic value from the market value? saying that gold is \"clearly underpriced in today's market\" is just hand-waving. a graham analysis such as \"net net\" (valuing stocks by their current tangible assets net of all liabilities) is a quantitative analysis of accounting numbers audited by cpas and offers a true margin of safety.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "are 'per trade' fees charged on every order or just once per stock?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in my experience they charge you coming and going. for example, if a brokerage firm is advertising that their commissions are only $7/trade, then that means you pay money to buy the stock, plus $7 to them, and later on if you want to sell that stock you must pay $7 to get out of the deal. so, if you want to make any money on a stock (say, priced at $10) you would have to sell it at a price above $10+$7+$7=$24. that kind of sale could take a few years to turn a profit. however, with flat-rate fees like that it is advantageous to buy in bulk.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "should i charge my children interest when they borrow money?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "as per the age of your son you mentions i would suggest yes, charge them an interest amount but lesser than the market rate. and give them a valid reason behind taking interest on given amount. the reason you might grab from below real incident happen with me at the time of diwali last year. i am 26, and i am currently doing job and my salary is not so much that i can accomplish all my dreams of buying expensive watch and many things. so i borrowed some strong amount from my mom. she gave me the amount but she asked me to pay interest of 5% and when i asked the reason behind demanding the interest she said something which was valuable things. she said me \"if i would not give you money then you will definitely ask money from some money lenders or your friends because now that watch is your first priority. and in that case you need to pay the higher interest rate to them. and in life there might be situation where we would not capable to help you in terms of financial. so this is the time you should learn to pay interest and responsibility of borrowing amount and repaying it on time with interest rate. this will help you also to learn a lesson and our money will be withing home i am not expert in parenting because i am still unmarried but i shared my point of view for your question. thanks", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what's the difference between buy and sell price on the stock exchange [duplicate]", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the same as when you are buying a car. if a dealer quotes 10k and you quote 8k. 8k is the buy price and 10k is the sell price. somebody might quote 8.5k and another dealer might quote 9.5k. the the new price that you see on your screen is 8.5k(best buy price) and 9.5k(best sell price). when the buyer and seller agree to an amount, the car(in your case stock) is traded.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i take advantage of tax-advantaged investments?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "while your entire investment strategy should not revolve around tax advantages, people who pay attention to these benefits can save themselves a significant amount of money.\\nthese are some of the most popular tax-advantaged investments for building wealth\\n1. traditional 401(k) plans\\n2. 403(b) plans & 457 plans\\n3. traditional ira\\n4. betterment: consider a diversified approach to your ira investments\\n5. roth 401(k), 403(b), 457 plans\\n6. 529 plan\\n7. health savings account (hsa)\\n8. municipal bonds\\n9. charitable giving", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why is the stock market price for a share always higher than the earnings per share?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "first, the earnings are per year, not per quarter. why would you expect to get a 100% per year return on your money? the earnings can go one of two ways. they can be retained, reinvested in the company, or they can be distributed as a dividend. so, the 'return' on this share is just over 5%, which is competitive with the rate you'd get on fixed investments. it's higher, in fact, as there's the risk that comes with holding the stock.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "my landlord is being foreclosed on. should i confront him?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if john signs the lease he is entitled to stay there for the duration of the lease regardless of the foreclosure status. http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/renters-foreclosure-what-are-their-30064.html i would suggest that signing a year lease (even by email), with the plan to leave as early as possible is a good thing. the key will be to make sure the penalty for leaving early is nothing. john doesn't know the status of the foreclosure, how long it will take, who might own afterwards and a lot of other unknowns. the worst case is to be unsure of where you are living. sign the lease, and be secure for one whole year that you know where you will be living. spend that year finding a new place to live. if the bank doesn't offer you clear and obvious ways to submit rent, open an account at the bank and deposit the rent there, on time. you are establishing credibility that you deserve to stay. you still owe the rent, so pay it. they don't want to be your landlord, but don't let a bank bully you around.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is it best to exercise options shares when they vest, or wait", "role": "user" }, { "content": "to me it depends on things like your net worth, debt, and how other assets are invested. currently you have 25k invested in the company you work for. if you have 100k in student loans, are a renter, and 12k in your 401k, then i would recommend exercising almost all of your options. in that case you have a much to large part of your world wrapped up in your company. if you have 250k in your 401k, own a home and have an emergency fund with no debt then you are fine with letting it ride. you can afford to absorb a loss of 25k without wrecking your net worth. more than likely, you are somewhere in between (just statistics speaking there). so why not exercise some of them now with the purpose of improving your financial situation? say do a 1/3 now and when they come available. when 401ks were first invented people put almost all of their money in their company stock. they lost just about everything when the company went down in value and were often a victim of layoffs exasperating the issue. this is akin to the same situation. most financial advisers recommend against putting any 401k money to company stock, or at least limiting the amount.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is it normal to think of money in different contexts?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "well, this relates to how you interpret something's value. we can use that magazine and restaurant as an example. for you the extra $10-$30 more on a decent meal or wine is worth it while $5 for a magazine entertainment on a train ride might not be. this is how all markets work, people make decisions about how they value something and hence choose to spend or not. if you're asking \"should i value certain things the way i do?\" well that's a different story e.g. should i keep that picture frame for years in the attic to sell it for $3 on ebay later. (probably not worth it) but again you are making that decision based on how you choose to value it. so to answer your question: how can i possibly care about this when my stock portfolio is losing (or gaining) $1000 a day? and is it normal? yes it is normal and we all care. everyone makes these decisions throughout each day, people will vary as to what they value something to be, but all in all everyone does just what you explained. here is something that you may find interesting it is about how we value money: what color is your money? if the pdf doesn't work for you then try this link: what color is your money alt link", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why do mutual fund trading limitations exist? e.g. 90 day transfer limits?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "mutual funds (that are not exchange-traded funds) often need to sell some of their securities to get cash when a shareholder redeems some shares. such transactions incur costs that are paid (proportionally) by all the shareholders in the fund, not just the person requesting redemption, and thus the remaining shareholders get a lower return. (exchange-traded funds are traded as if they are shares of common stock, and a shareholder seeking a redemption pays the costs of the redemption). for this reason, many mutual funds do not allow redemptions for some period of time after a purchase, or purchases for some period of time after a redemption. the periods of time are chosen by the fund, and are stated in the prospectus (which everyone has acknowledged has been received before an investment was made).", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why are u.s. credit unions not open to everyone?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "it's required by law. 12 usc 1759 (b) requires that membership in a credit union be limited to one or more groups with a \"common bond\", or to people within a particular geographic area. for lots more gory details on how this is interpreted and enforced, you can read the manual given to credit unions by the national credit union administration, which is their regulatory agency.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is cost of living overstated?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i live in upstate ny. it's a great, reasonable cost place to live -- provided that you have a job. in nyc, there are probably a few hundred jobs with duties similar to mine in a 45-minute radius. upstate, there may be 5-6.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how do i read technicals for tickers that move together but are slightly different?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "following comments to your question here, you posted a separate question about why spy, spx, and the options contract don't move perfectly together. that's here why don't spy, spx, and the e-mini s&p 500 track perfectly with each other? i provided an answer to that question and will build on it to answer what i think you're asking on this question. specifically, i explained what it means that these are \"all based on the s&p.\" each is a different entity, and different market forces keep them aligned. i think talking about \"technicals\" on options contracts is going to be too confusing since they are really a very different beast based on forward pricing models, so, for this question, i'll focus on only spy and spx. as in my other answer, it's only through specific market forces (the creation / redemption mechanism that i described in my other answer), that they track at all. there's nothing automatic about this and it has nothing to do with some issuer of spy actually holding stock in the companies that comprise the spx index. (that's not to say that the company does or doesn't hold, just that this doesn't drive the prices.) what ever technical signals you're tracking, will reflect all of the market forces at play. for spx (the index), that means some aggregate behavior of the component companies, computed in a \"mathematically pure\" way. for spy (the etf), that means (a) the behavior of spx and (b) the behavior of the etf as it trades on the market, and (c) the action of the authorized participants. these are simply different things. which one is \"right\"? that depends on what you want to do. in theory you might be able to do some analysis of technical signals on spy and spx and, for example, use that to make money on the way that they fail to track each other. if you figure out how to do that, though, don't post it here. send it to me directly. :)", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "events that cause major movement in forex?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "look for unsustainable policies and actions by policy makers, both before and possibly during, when looking at the forex markets. consider some examples: each of those events could be seen in the growing unsustainability of local policies. forex markets and local policies can appear to stay on an unsustainable path for a long time, but equilibrium will force itself on everything in the long run. in two of the above cases, the initial response wasn't enough to offset the mess, and more and more intervention had to be done, only making matters worse. when you know how unsustainable policies are and how big the corrections need to be, you can quickly ascertain whether an action by policy makers will be enough.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i get the most value from my employer's espp?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a 15% discount is a 17.6% return. (100/85 = 1.176). for a holding period that's an average 15.5 days, a half month. it would be silly to compound this over a year as the numbers are limited. the safest way to do this is to sell the day you are permitted. in effect, you are betting, 12 times a year, that the stock won't drop 15% in 3 days. you can pull data going back decades, or as long as your company has been public, and run a spreadsheet to see how many times, if at all, the stock has seen this kind of volatility over 3 day periods. even for volatile stocks, a 15% move is pretty large, you're likely to find your stock doing this less than once per year. it's also safest to not accumulate too many shares of your company for multiple reasons, having to do with risk spreading, diversification, etc. 2 additional points - the brexit just caused the s&p to drop 4% over the last 3 days trading. this was a major world event, but, on average we are down 4%. one would have to be very unlucky to have their stock drop 15% over the specific 3 days we are discussing. the dollars at risk are minimal. say you make $120k/yr. $10k/month. 15% of this is $1500 and you are buying $1765 worth of stock. the gains, on average are expected to be $265/mo. doesn't seem like too much, but it's $3180 over a years' time. $3180 in profit for a maximum $1500 at risk at any month's cycle.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "should i open a credit card when i turn 18 just to start a credit score?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "assuming i only use it to buy things i can afford (which i trust myself to do), essentially treating it as a debit card, is this a good idea? this is definitely a good idea. from my own experience, before i got my first credit card through my local bank (age 18), i tired to apply for a card that has cash back rewards and was rejected because i didn't have any credit history. after i had the card from my bank for 6 months, i applied for this capital one card that i've had ever since.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why small retail stores ask for id with a credit card while big don't", "role": "user" }, { "content": "probably because large chains can absorb the loss from fraud better than small stores do. thus, small stores want to ensure that the person holding the card is the same as the name on the card.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i estimate business taxes / filing fees for a business that has $0 income?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "is the business an s-corp, llc or sole prop? i am going to guess based on the question that it is an llc that you never closed with the state and you live in a state (ny) that charges a fee for having an llc in the state in which case you owe those fees to the state. i am not aware of any taxes on the mere existence of a business by the irs. i think you are going to find out that the are no taxes owed to the irs for this nonexistent activity.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "investment property information resources", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i personally found the \"for dummies\" books, on property investment, very helpful and a great primer. i found them unbiased and very informative, laying out the basic principles. depending on your knowledge it can provide you with enough of a foundation to have an informed conversation with banks/real estates etc. watch the markets for a while (at least 6 months) to know what prices vendors will be expecting and rents tenants will be expecting, most property magazines will also contain a suburb summary in the back. when you get closer to purchase make sure to ask your bank for the rp data reports on the properties you are looking at, the banks will typically provide these for free. i also set out some points for myself which i made clear for myself at the beginning: this might provide a good starting point and really narrow down your research options as generic research on property investment can be overwhelming. i ended up with a 3 bedder in western sydney that has so far happily paid for itself. building a good relationship with real estate agents and attending lots of open homes/auctions and talking to other investors can only help. i was once told if you attend free property investment seminars you will always learn at least one new thing (be it statistics, methodologies, finance options etc ), with that in mind always keep a level head, leave your wallet at home and don't sign up to anything. at the end of the day keep a cool head, don't stop reading and rush nothing.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how do small cap stocks perform vs. large cap stocks (like dow constituents) during bear trends?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "to a certain extent, small cap companies will in general follow the same trends as large cap companies. the extent of this cointegration depends on numerous factors, but a prime reason is the presence of systemic risk, i.e. the risk to the entire market. in simple terms, sthis is the risk that your portfolio will approach asymptotically as you increase its diversification, and it's why hedging is also important. that being said, small cap businesses will, in general, likely do worse than large cap stocks, for several reasons. this was/is certainly the case in the great recession. small cap businesses have, on average, higher betas, which is a measure of a company's risk compared to the overall market. this means that small cap companies, on average outperform large cap companies during boom times, but it also means that they suffer more on average during bear times. the debate over whether or not the standard beta is still useful for small cap companies continues, however. some economists feel that small cap companies are better measured against the russell 2000 or similar indexes instead of the s&p 500. small cap companies may face problems accessing or maintaining access to lines of credit. during the great recession, major lenders decreased their lending to small businesses, which might make it harder for them to weather the storm. on a related point, small businesses might not have as large an asset base to use as collateral for loans in bad times. one notable large cap company that used its asset base to their advantage was ford, which gave banks partial ownership of its factories during hard times. this a) gave ford a good amount of cash with which to continue their short-term operations, and b) gave the banks a vested interest in keeping ford's lines of credit open. ford struggled, but it never faced the financial problems of gm and chrysler. despite political rhetoric about main street vs. wall street, small businesses don't receive as much government aid in times of crisis as some large cap companies do. for example, the small business lending fund, a brilliant but poorly implemented idea in 2010, allocated less than $30 billion to small businesses. (the actual amount loaned was considerably less). compare that to the amounts loaned out under tarp. discussions about corporate lobbying power aside, small businesses aren't as crucial to the overall stability of the financial system small businesses don't always have the manpower to keep up with changes in regulation. when the dodd-frank act passed, large banks (as an example), could hire more staff to understand it and adapt to it relatively easily; small banks, however, don't always have the resources to invest in such efforts. there are other reasons, some of which are industry-specific, but these are some of the basic ones. if you want visual confirmation that small cap businesses follow a similar trend, here is a graph of the russell 2000 and s&p 500 indexes: here is a similar graph for the russell 2000 and the dow jones industrial average. if you wanted to confirm this technically and control for the numerous complicated factors (overlap between indexes, systemic risk, seasonal adjustment, etc.), just ask and i'll try to run some numbers on it when i have a chance. keep in mind, too, that looking at a pretty picture is no substitute for rigorous financial econometrics. a basic start would be to look at the correlation between the indexes, which i calculate as 0.9133 and 0.9526, respectively. as you can see, they're pretty close. once again, however, the reality is more complicated technically, and a sufficiently detailed analysis is beyond my capabilities. just a quick side note. these graphs show the logarithm of the values of the indexes, which is a common statistical nuance that is used when comparing time series with radically different magnitudes but similar trends. s&p500 and russell 2000 data came from yahoo! finance, and the dow jones industrial average data came from federal reserve economic data (fred) per usual, i try to provide code whenever possible, if i used it. here is the stata code i used to generate the graphs above. this code assumes the presence of russell2000.csv and sp500.csv, downloaded from yahoo! finance, and djia.csv, downloaded from fred, in the current directory. fidelity published an article on the subject that you might find interesting, and seeking alpha has several pieces related to small-cap vs. large-cap returns that might be worth a read too.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what is the lifespan of a series of currency?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "us currency doesn't expire, it is always legal tender. i can see some trouble if you tried to spend a $10,000 bill (you'd be foolish to do so, since they are worth considerably more). maybe some stores raise eyebrows at old-style $100's (many stores don't take $100 bills at all), but you could swap them for new style at a bank if having trouble with a particular store. old-series currency can be an issue when trying to exchange us bills in other countries, just because it doesn't expire here, doesn't mean you can't run into issues elsewhere. other countries have different policies, for example, over the last year the uk phased in a new five pound note, and as of last month (5/5/2017) the old fiver is no longer considered legal tender (can still swap out old fivers at the bank for now at least). edit: i mistook which currency you took where, and focused on us currency instead of canadian, but it looks like it's the same story there.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can you beat the market by investing in double long etfs? [duplicate]", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you miss the step where the return being doubled is daily. consider you invested $100 today, went up 10%, and tomorrow you went down 10%. third day market went up 1.01% and without leverage - got even. here's the calculation for you: day - start - end 1 $100 $120 - +10% doubled 2 $120 $96 - -10% doubled 3 $96 $97.94 - +1.01% doubled so in fact you're in $2.06 loss, while without leveraging you would break even. that means that if the trend is generally positive, but volatile - you'll end up barely breaking even while the non-leveraged investment would make profits. that's what the quote means. edit to summarize the long and fruitless discussion in the comments: the reason that the leveraged etf's are very good for day-trading is exactly the same reason why they are bad for continuous investment. you should buy them when there's a reasonable expectation for the market to immediately go in the direction you expect. if for whatever reason you believe the markets will plunge, or soar, tomorrow - you should buy a leveraged etf, ride the plunge, and sell it in the end of the day. but you asked the question about volatile markets, not markets going in one direction. there - you lose.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do my 401k/roth accounts benefit from compounding?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "sure, stocks don't pay interest. i just looked up the word \"compound\" in a couple of dictionaries and the relevant definition in all of them just mentioned interest and not growth in the value of stock. so it may be technically inaccurate to talk about \"compound growth\" of a stock. i'll yield to someone more knowledgeable about the technical language of finance to answer that part. but regardless of whether the word strictly applies, the concept certainly does. suppose you put $1000 into a mutual fund and the fund grows by 10%. you now have $1100. the next year the fund grows by 15%. so you gain 15% of what? of your original $1000? no, of your present balance, $1100. the effect is the same as compound interest. there is the fundamental difference that interest is normally a fixed rate: you get such-and-such percent a year as spelled out in a contract. but change in the value of a stock depends on many factors, none of them guaranteed.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "did an additional $32 billion necessarily get invested into amazon.com stock on october 26th, 2017?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the market capitalization of a stock is the number of shares outstanding (of each stock class), times the price of last trade (of each stock class). in a liquid market (where there are lots of buyers and sellers at all price points), this represents the price that is between what people are bidding for the stock and what people are asking for the stock. if you offer any small amount more than the last price, there will be a seller, and if you ask any small amount less than the last price, there will be a buyer, at least for a small amount of stock. thus, in a liquid market, everyone who owns the stock doesn't want to sell at least some of their stock for a bit less than the last trade price, and everyone who doesn't have the stock doesn't want to buy some of the stock for a bit more than the last trade price. with those assumptions, and a low-friction trading environment, we can say that the last trade value is a good midpoint of what people think one share is worth. if we then multiply it by the number of shares, we get an approximation of what the company is worth. in no way, shape or form does it not mean that there is 32 billion more invested in the company, or even used to purchase stock. there are situations where a 32 billion market cap swing could mean 32 billion more money was invested in the company: the company issues a pile of new shares, and takes in the resulting money. people are completely neutral about this gathering in of cash in exchange for dilluting shares. so the share price remains unchanged, the company gains 32 billion dollars, and there are now more shares outstanding. now, in some sense, there is zero dollars currently invested in a stock; when you buy a stock, you no longer have the money, and the money goes to the person who no longer has the stock. the issue here is the use of the continuous tense of \"invested in\"; the investment was made at some point, but the money doesn't really stay in this continuous state of being. unless you consider the investment liquid, and the option to take money out being implicit, it being a continuous action doesn't make much sense. sometimes the money is invested in the company, when the company causes stocks to come into being and sells them. the owners of stocks has invested money in stocks in that they spent that money to buy the stocks, but the total sum of money ever spent on stocks for a given company is not really a useful value. the market capitalization is an approximation, which under the efficient market hypothesis (that markets find the correct price for things nearly instantly) is reasonably accurate, of the value the company has collectively to its shareholders. the efficient market hypothesis isn't accurate, but it is an acceptable rule of thumb. now, this value -- market capitalization -- is arguably not the total value of a company: other stakeholders include bond holders, labour, management, various contract counter-parties, government and customers. some companies are structured so that almost all value is captured not by the stock owners, but by contract counter-parties (this is sometimes used for hiding assets or debts). but for most large publically traded companies, it (in theory) shouldn't be far off.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "figuring flood insurance into financing cost", "role": "user" }, { "content": "self-insure a $250k+ house that's deemed to be in a flood zone? wake up, have coffee. if you don't change your mind, have another cup.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "pay or not pay charged-off accounts for mortgage qualification", "role": "user" }, { "content": "your post has some assumptions that are not, or may not be true. for one the assumption is that you have to wait 7 years after you settle your debts to buy a home. that is not the case. for some people (me included) settling an charged off debt was part of my mortgage application process. it was a small debt that a doctor's office claimed i owed, but i didn't. the mortgage company told me, settling the debt was \"the cost of doing business\". settling your debts can be looked as favorable. option 1, in my opinion is akin to stealing. you borrowed the money and you are seeking to game the system by not paying your debts. would you want someone to do that to you? iirc the debt can be sold to another company, and the time period is refreshed and can stay on your credit report for beyond the 7 years. i could be wrong, but i feel like there is a way for potential lenders to see unresolved accounts well beyond specified time periods. after all, the lenders are the credit reporting agencies customers and they seek to provide the most accurate view of a potential lender. with 20k of unresolved cc debt they should point that out to their customers. option 2: do you have 20k? i'd still seek to settle, you do not have to wait 7 years. your home may not appreciate in 2 years. in my own case my home has appricated very little in the 11 years that i have owned it. many people have learned the hard way that homes do not necessarily increase in value. it is very possible that you may have a net loss in equity in two years. repairs or improvements can evaporate the small amount of equity that is achieved over two years with a 30 year mortgage. i would hope that you pause a bit at the fact that you defaulted on 20k in debt. that is a lot of money. although it is a lot, it is a small amount in comparison to the cost and maintenance of a home. are you prepared to handle such a responsibility? what has changed in your personality since the 20k default? the tone of your posts suggests you are headed for the same sort of calamity. this is far more than a numbers game it is behavioral.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how should i prepare for the next financial crisis?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "how would gold have protected you during the 2007/8 crisis? in no way, shape or form. the ways to protect yourself at any time are: boring, huh?", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what publicly available software do professional stock traders use for stock analysis?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "bloomberg professional seems to be very popular. it provides any kind of data you can imagine. analysis is a subjective interpretation of the data.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "credit card approval", "role": "user" }, { "content": "banks use quite a few parameters to arrive at the decision for card approval. the credit score is just one input. there are multiple other inputs it would source, for example total years in job, the number of years in current job, income streams, etc ... the exact formula is a trade secret and varies from bank to bank", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "insurance for a house which is not homeowners insurance?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "what you need will depend on a number of factors that aren't clear from the question. this coverage is simply called \"vacant home insurance\", but not all companies are willing to offer this coverage. unfortunately, in new york, insurers can also legally drop your standard homeowners' coverage if they become aware that your property has become vacant for 30 days or more. the insurer's concerns typically, a \"standard\" homeowners policy will have an exclusion clause for vacant homes. the insurance company's concern is that without someone in the home, they will be at risk for break-ins, squatters and vandalism. if you've ever seen \"flip men\" on spike, you'll know this is a serious concern (great show, by the way). they will use a risk model to calculate an estimated risk for the property (this is why a seasonal vacation home in a sparsely-populated area is often less of a concern than a family home in an urban area). if they estimate the risk to be low, some insurance companies will allow to you buy back that exclusion so that vacant properties are covered. in your case, they have probably decided that either: your options first, you need to find a company that is comfortable with taking on the extra risk of a vacant home. this will vary quite a bit by location, but the main ones are farmer's (they use the foremost brand name in new york) and castle rock. there are lots of insurance agencies that also advertise these products, but most of them are middlemen and use one of these two companies to actually write the coverage. additionally, since this is a specialty policy, make sure you understand all of the details of the policy, and how they vary from a regular policy including: how to reduce your premium costs these are general tips from the murray group's website (an independent broker in ny) on how to lower the additional cost of vacant coverage: this may sound expensive, but these steps will all reduce the risk of something really bad happening when you're not there. additionally, do you know anyone you completely trust (relative, unemployed friend) that might want to live in your old house rent-free for a while? this could work out for you if they are willing to keep the place 100% clean around the clock so that you can show the house at any time. if you have additional/specific questions, you should be able to find an independent insurance broker in your area that would be willing to advise you on your specific situation for a flat fee. best of luck with getting the home covered and sold quickly!", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "which types of investments should be choosen for 401k at early 20's?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i can't find a decent duplicate, so here are some general guidelines: first of all by \"stocks\" the answers generally mean \"equities\" which could be either single stocks or mutual funds that consist of stocks. unless you have lots of experience that can help you discern good stocks from bad, investing in mutual funds reduces the risk considerably. if you want to fine-tune the plan, you can weigh certain categories higher to change your risk/return profile (e.g. equity funds will have higher returns and risk than fixed income (bond) funds, so if you want to take a little more risk you can put more in equity funds and less in fixed income funds). lastly, don't stress too much over the individual investments. the most important thing is that you get as much company match as you can. you cannot beat the 100% return that comes from a company match. the allocation is mostly insignificant compared to that. plus you can probably change your allocation later easily and cheaply if you don't like it. disclaimer: these are _general_ guidelines for 401(k) investing in general and not personal advice.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "in a competitive market, why is movie theater popcorn expensive?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "it's called extracting consumer surplus. basically i have a bunch of movie goers (who have paid a lot for their tickets). some of them don't like popcorn, and some do. of the people in the latter group, there are some who are willing to pay a lot for it. that's partly because i have a select group (rich movie goers) and partly because some of these people would be willing to pay more for popcorn with a movie than without. if i were just selling \"popcorn,\" i'd have to charge a competitive price. but i'm really selling movies, which have more than covered my costs (rent, heat, etc.) so my costs of selling popcorn are less than that of a non-movie popcorn seller, and i don't really \"need\" to sell it. ironically, it means that i can \"take my chances\" and sell a relatively small amount at a high price, thereby maximizing my unit profit. i don't mind having people not buy popcorn because i've already made my profit from them with the movie. from the point of view of the consumer, most consumers see popcorn as an \"afterthought.\" they will seldom think, \"i can buy popcorn $2.00 cheaper at theater a than theater b, and there's a 20 percent chance that i will want to buy popcorn, so theater a is 40 cents ($2.00*.20) cheaper than theater b.\" instead, most make the decision to buy the popcorn after they've arrived at theater b, because it as \"impulse item.\" and even if they do the \"40 cents\" calculation, theater b might be selected because other factors (convenience, location, etc.) outweigh the 40 cent extra cost of popcorn (purchased \"sometimes\"). put another way, the cost of popcorn is (usually) heavily discounted because of its \"remoteness\" to other facets of the decision.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "college student lacking investment experience: how to begin investing money?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if you have wage income that is reported on a w2 form, you can contribute the maximum of your wages, what you can afford, or $5500 in a roth ira. one advantage of this is that the nominal amounts you contribute can always be removed without tax consequences, so a roth ira can be a deep emergency fund (i.e., if the choice is $2000 in cash as emergency fund or $2000 in cash in a 2015 roth ira contribution, choice 2 gives you more flexibility and optimistic upside at the risk of not being able to draw on interest/gains until you retire or claim losses on your tax return). if you let april 15 2016 pass by without making a roth ira contribution, you lose the 2015 limit forever. if you are presently a student and partially employed, you are most likely in the lowest marginal tax rate you will be in for decades, which utilizes the roth tax game effectively. if you're estimating \"a few hundred\", then what you pick as an investment is going to be less important than making the contributions. that is, you can pick any mutual fund that strikes your fancy and be prepared to gain or lose, call it $50/year (or pick a single stock and be prepared to lose it all). at some point, you need to understand your emotions around volatility, and the only tuition for this school is taking a loss and having the presence of mind to examine any panic responses you may have. no reason not to learn this on \"a few hundred\". while it's not ideal to have losses in a roth, \"a few hundred\" is not consequential in the long run. if you're not prepared at this time in your life for the possibility of losing it all (or will need the money within a year or few, as your edit suggests), keep it in cash and try to reduce your expenses to contribute more. can you contribute another $100? you will have more money at the end of the year than investment choice will likely return.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "income tax for purchased/sold short term & long term shares", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no tax would have been deducted at the time of purchase/sale of shares. you would yourself be required to compute your tax liability and then pay taxes to the govt. in case the shares sold were held for less than 1 year - 15% tax on capital gains would be levied. in case the shares sold were held for more than 1 year - no tax would be levied and the income earned would be tax free. ps: no tax is levied at the time of purchase of shares and tax is only applicable at the time of sale of shares.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "transfering funds from india to the us", "role": "user" }, { "content": "can i transfer funds from india to usa which i have borrowed in india. funds borrowed in india may not be transferred outside of india as per foreign exchange management act. loans in rupees to non-residents against security of shares or immovable property in india:- subject to the directions issued by the reserve bank from time to time in this regard, an authorised dealer in india may grant loan to a non-resident indian, e) the loan amount shall not be remitted outside india;", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can i open a solo 401(k) if i am an independent contractor but also work part-time as an employee?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if you have self-employment income you can open a solo 401k. your question is unclear as to what your employment status is. if you are self-employed as an independent contractor, you can open a solo 401k. you can still do this even if you also earn non-self-employment income (i.e., you are an employee and receive a w-2). however, the limits for contributions to a solo 401k are based on your self-mployment income, not your total income, so if you have only a small amount of self-employment income, you won't be able to contribute much to the solo 401k. you may be able to reduce your taxes somewhat, but it's not like you can earn $1000 of self-employment income, open a solo 401k, and dump $5000 into it; the limits don't work that way.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why does my bank suddenly need to know where my money comes from?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "banks have a financial, and regulational duty called \"know your customer\", established to avoid a number of historical problems occurring again, such as money laundering, terrorism financing, fraud, etc. thanks to the scale, and scope of the problem (millions of customers, billions of transactions a day), the way they're handling this usually involves fuzzy logics matching, looking for irregular patterns, problem escalation, and other warning signs. when exceeding some pre-set limit, these signal clues are then filtered, and passed on for human inspection. needless to say, these algorithms are not perfect, although, thanks to financial pressure, they are improving. in order to understand why your trading account has been suspended, it's useful to look at the incentives: false positives -suspending your trade, and assuming you guilty until proven otherwise- could cost them merely your ltv (lifetime value of customer -how much your business brings in as profit); while false negatives -not catching you while engaging in activities listed above- might cost them multi-month investigations, penalties, and court. ultimately, this isn't against you. i've been with the bank for 15 years and the money in the accounts has been very slowly accumulated via direct-deposit paychecks over that time. from this i gather the most likely explanation, is that you've hit somekind of account threshold, that the average credit-happy customers usually do not exceed, which triggered a routine checkup. how do you deal with it? practice puppetry! there is only one way to survive angry customers emotionally: you have to realize that they’re not angry at you; they’re angry at your business, and you just happen to be a convenient representative of that business. and since they’re treating you like a puppet, an iconic stand-in for the real business, you need to treat yourself as a puppet, too. pretend you’re a puppeteer. the customer is yelling at the puppet. they’re not yelling at you. they’re angry with the puppet. your job is to figure out, “gosh, what can i make the puppet say that will make this person a happy customer?” in an investigation case, go with boredom: the puppet doesn't care, have no feelings, and is eternally patient. figure out what are the most likely words that will have the matter \"mentally resolved\" from the investigator's point of view, tell them what they have to hear, and you'll have case closed in no time. hope this helps.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "buying a multi-family home to rent part and live in the rest", "role": "user" }, { "content": "think carefully about the added expenses. it may still make sense, but it probably won't be as cheap as you are thinking. in addition to the mortgage and property taxes, there is also insurance and building maintenance and repairs. appliances, carpets, and roofs need to be replaced periodically. depending on the area of the country there is lawn maintenance and now removal. you need to make sure you can cover the expenses if you are without a tenant for 6 months or longer. when tenants change, there is usually some cleaning and painting that needs to be done. you can deduct the mortgage interest and property taxes on your part of the building. you need to claim any rent as income, but can deduct the other part of the mortgage interest and taxes as an expense. you can also deduct building maintenance and repairs on the rental portion of the building. some improvements need to be depreciated over time (5-27 years). you also need to depreciate the cost of the rental portion of the building. this basically means that you get a deduction each year, but lower the cost basis of the building so you owe more capital gains taxes when you sell. if you do this, i would get a professional to do your taxes at least the first year. its not hard once you see it done, but there are a lot of details and complications that you want to get right.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can we compare peer-to-peer loans to savings accounts?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "that argument is an argument for investing generally, not peer-to-peer lending per se, and the argument as phrased (\"thus you should invest your money at a peer-to-peer loan platform\") is a false dichotomy. that said, as soon as one is investing as opposed to just getting a small but guaranteed return, then risk comes into play. in that sense, any savings account is fundamentally different from any investment, and, in that reading, the two shouldn't be compared as different approaches to \"investing\". peer-to-peer lending as an investment could be aptly compared with stock market investing, for one.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how safe is a checking account?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in addition to @mhoran_psprep answer, and inspired by @wayne's comment. if the bank won't let you block automatic transfers between accounts, drop the bank like a hot potato they've utterly failed basic account security principles, and shouldn't be trusted with anyone's money. it's not the bank's money, and you're the only one that can authorize any kind of transfer out. i limit possible losses through debit and credit cards very simply. i keep only a small amount on each (~$500), and manually transfer more on an as needed basis. because there is no automatic transfers to these cards, i can't lose everything in the checking account, even temporarily.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "should a high-school student invest their (relative meager) savings?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "between 1 and 2 g is actually pretty decent for a high school student. your best bet in my opinion is to wait the next (small) stock market crash, and then invest in an index fund. a fund that tracks the sp500 or the russel 2000 would be a good choice. by stock market crash, i'm talking about a 20% to 30% drop from the highest point. the stock market is at an all time high, but nobody knows if it's going to keep going. i would avoid penny stocks, at least until you can read their annual report and understand most of what they're claiming, especially the cash flow statement. from the few that i've looked at, penny stock companies just keep issuing stock to raise money for their money loosing operations. i'd also avoid individual stocks for now. you can setup a practice account somewhere online, and try trading. your classmates probably brag about how much they've made, but they won't tell you how much they lost. you are not misusing your money by \"not doing anything with it\". your classmates are gambling with it, they might as well go to a casino. echoing what others have said, investing in yourself is your best option at this point. try to get into the best school that you can. anything that gives you an edge over other people in terms of experience or education is good. so try to get some leadership and team experience. , and some online classes in a field that interests you.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "good way to record currency conversion transactions in personal accounting software?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i found an answer by peter selinger, in two articles, tutorial on multiple currency accounting (june 2005, jan 2011) and the accompanying multiple currency accounting in gnucash (june 2005, feb 2007). selinger embraces the currency neutrality i'm after. his method uses \"[a]n account that is denominated as a difference of multiple currencies... known as a currency trading account.\" currency trading accounts show the gain or loss based on exchange rates at any moment. apparently gnucash 2.3.9 added support for multi-currency accounting. i haven't tried this myself. this feature is not enabled by default, and must be turned on explicity. to do so, check \"use trading accounts\" under file -> properties -> accounts. this must be done on a per-file basis. thanks to mike alexander, who implemented this feature in 2007, and worked for over 3 years to convince the gnucash developers to include it. older versions of gnucash, such as 1.8.11, apparently had a feature called \"currency trading accounts\", but they behaved differently than selinger's method.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why deep in the money options have very low liquidity", "role": "user" }, { "content": "there is less liquidity because they are less volatile. option traders aren't exactly risk averse (read: are degenerate gamblers) and the other market participants that use options don't have much use for deep in the money options. also, just trade more liquid assets and equities if you want liquid options. at-the-money options, and at-the-money options strategies have hundreds and thousand percent payoffs on relatively mundane price changes in the underlying asset.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "ownership in company and rounds of investment", "role": "user" }, { "content": "say the company has created 500 shares [or whatever number]. you have 10 shares [equivalent of 2%]. now when new capital is needed, generally more shares are created. say they create 100 more shares and sell it to venture capital to raise funds. after this happens; total shares: 500+100 = 600 you own: 10 shares your ownership % = 1.66% down from 2% like wise for other older shareholder. the new venture guy gets 16.66% of ownership. more funds would mean more growth and overall the value of your 10 shares would be more depending on the valuation.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do i have to explain the source of *all* income on my taxes?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "@ronjohn's answer for pallet of $20's is right for the specific case. for the general case of all income, it depends on whether or not the the source of the income was potentially criminal. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timtodd/2015/11/16/a-win-for-the-5th-amendment-at-the-tax-court/ i am not a lawyer, but reading that article, one needs to provide the total amount, but not the source if there's a risk of self-incrimination.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "overnight charges for brokers holding stocks?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if you are trading cfds, which are usually traded on margin, you will usually be charged an overnight financing fee for long positions held overnight and you will receive an overnight financing credit for short positions held overnight. most cfd brokers will have their overnight financing rates set at + or - 2.5% or 3% from the country's official interest rates. so if your country's official interest rate is 5% and your broker uses + or - 2.5%, you will get a 2.5% credit for any short positions held overnight and pay 7.5% fee for any long positions held overnight. in australia the official interest rate is 2.5%, so i get 0% for short positions and pay 5% for long positions held overnight. if you are looking to hold positions open long term (especially long positions) you might think twice before using cfds to trade as you may end up paying quite a bit in interest over a long period of time. these financing fees are charged because you are borrowing the funds to open your positions, if you buy shares directly you would not be charged such overnight financing fees.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "technical analysis not working", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i would echo @victor's comments. one book and 1000 web pages doesnt make you a good investor/trader. there are some basic things you should be aware of and read up on there are a few books that i would recommend i have been trading for over 10 years, my dad for over 30 years and we are both continually learning new things. don't read one book and assume you know it all. bear in mind that there are always new indicators being thought up and new ways of using and interpreting the same information, so keep reading and educating yourself.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "where do short-term traders look for the earliest stock related news?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "there's a whole industry devoted to this. professionals use bloomberg terminals. high frequency traders have computers read news feeds for them. amateurs use trading consoles (like thinkorswim) to get headlines quickly on stocks.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is there anything comparable to/resembling cnn's fear and greed index?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "there are a number of ways to measure such things and they are generally called \"sentiment indicators\". the ones that i have seen \"work\", in the sense that they show relatively high readings near market tops and relatively low readings near market bottoms. the problem is that there are no thresholds that work consistently. for example, at one market top a sentiment indicator may read 62. at the next market top that same indicator might read 55. so what threshold do you use next time? maybe the top will come at 53, or maybe it will not come until 65. there was a time when i could have listed examples for you with the names of the indicators and what they signaled and when. but i gave up on such things years ago after seeing such wide variation. i have been at this a long time (30+ years), and i have not found anything that works as well as we would like at identifying a top in real time. the best i have found (although it does give false signals) is a drop in price coupled with a bearish divergence in breadth. the latter is described in \"stan weinstein's secrets for profiting in bull and bear markets\". market bottoms are a little less difficult to identify in real time. one thing i would suggest if you think that there is some way to get a significant edge in investing, is to look at the results of mark hulbert's monitoring of newsletters. virtually all of them rise and fall with the market and almost none are able to beat buy and hold of the wilshire 5000 over the long term.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what do i do with a p11d expenses & benefits form?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the p11d is a record of the total benefits you've received in a tax year that haven't been taxed in another way, a bit like the p60 is a record of the total pay and tax you've paid in a tax year. note that travel for business purposes shouldn't be taxable, and if that's what's being reported on the p11d you may need to make a claim for tax relief to hmrc to avoid having to pay the tax. i'm not sure whether it's normal for such expenses to be reported there. hmrc will normally collect that tax by adjusting your tax code after the p11d is issued, so that more tax is taken off your future income. so you don't need to do anything, as it'll be handled automatically. as to how you know it's accurate, if you have any doubts you'd need to contact your former employer and ask them to confirm the details. in general you ought to know what benefits you actually received so should at least be able to figure out if the number is plausible. if your \"travel\" was a flight to the usa, then probably it was. if it was a bus ticket, less so :-) if you fill in a tax return, you'll also have to report the amount there which will increase the tax you owe/reduce your refund. you won't be charged twice even if your tax code also changes, as the tax return accounts for the total amount of tax you've already paid. for travel benefits, the exact treatment in relation to tax/p11ds is summarised here.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can my rent to own equity be used as a downpayment?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i think you need to go to a local bank and ask. the key thing is paper trail. for any mortgage i've gotten on a new purchase, the bank needs to see where the down payment came from and how it got to the seller. in this case, it can go either way. if the value is truly 100% to the 80% you are looking to finance, and the paper trail is legit, this may work just fine. the issue others seem to have is that simply buying at a 20% discount is not a legit way to finance the 80%. here, it appears to me that the 20% came from you in installments, via the rent.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "car dealer saying that they cannot see any credit information for my co-applicant. could this be a scam?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "its not a scam. the car dealership does not care how you pay for the car, just that you pay. if you come to them for a loan they will try and service you. if you come with cash, they will sell you a car and not try to talk you into financing. if you come with a check from another bank, they will happily accept it. i would try to work with equifax or a local credit union to figure out what is going on. somehow she probably had her credit frozen. here are some really good things to mitigate this situation: oh and make sure you do #1 and forget about financing cars ever again. i mean if you want to build wealth.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what are the ins/outs of writing equipment purchases off as business expenses in a home based business?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "keep this rather corny acronym in mind. business expenses must be corn: as other posters have already pointed out, certain expenses that are capital items (computers, furniture, etc.) must be depreciated over several years, but you have a certain amount of capital items that you can write off in the current tax year.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "advice for opening an ira as a newbie", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if you want to 'offset' current (2016) income, only deductible contribution to a traditional ira does that. you can make nondeductible contributions to a trad ira, and there are cases where that makes sense for the future and cases where it doesn't, but it doesn't give you a deduction now. similarly a roth ira has possible advantages and disadvantages, but it does not have a deduction now. currently he maximum is $5500 per person ($6500 if over age 50, but you aren't) which with two accounts (barely) covers your $10k. to be eligible to make this deductible traditional contribution, you must have earned income (employment or self-employment, but not the distribution from another ira) at least the amount you want to contribute not have combined income (specifically magi, modified adjusted gross income) exceeding the phaseout limit (starts at $96,000 for married-joint) if you were covered during the year (either you or your spouse) by an employer retirement plan (look at box 13 on your w-2's). with whom. pretty much any bank, brokerage, or mutual fund family can handle iras. (to be technical, the bank's holding company will have an investment arm -- to you it will usually look like one operation with one name and logo, one office, one customer service department, one website etc, but the investment part must be legally separate from the insured banking part so you may notice a different name on your legal and tax forms.) if you are satisified with the custodian of the inherited ira you already have, you might just stay with them -- they may not need as much paperwork, you don't need to meet and get comfortable with new people, you don't need to learn a new website. but if they sold you an annuity at your age -- as opposed to you inheriting an already annuitized ira -- i'd want a lot of details before trusting they are acting in your best interests; most annuities sold to ira holders are poor deals. in what. since you want only moderate risk at least to start, and also since you are starting with a relatively small amount where minimum investments, expenses and fees can make more of an impact on your results, i would go with one or a few broad (= lower risk) index (= lower cost) fund(s). every major fund familly also offers at least a few 'balanced' funds which give you a mixture of stocks and bonds, and sometimes some 'alternatives', in one fund. remember this is not committing you forever; any reasonable custodian will allow you to move or spread to more-adventurous (but not wild and crazy) investments, which may be better for you in future years when you have some more money in the account and some more time to ponder your goals and options and comfort level.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "when to hire an investment professional?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i don't know what you mean by 'major'. do you mean the fund company is a fidelity or vanguard, or that the fund is broad, as in an s&p fund? the problem starts with a question of what your goals are. if you already know the recommended mix for your age/risk, as you stated, you should consider minimizing the expenses, and staying diy. i am further along, and with 12 year's income saved, a 1% hit would be 12% of a year's pay, i'd be working 1-1/2 months to pay the planner? in effect, you are betting that a planner will beat whatever metric you consider valid by at least that 1% fee, else you can just do it yourself and be that far ahead of the game. i've accepted the fact that i won't beat the average (as measured by the s&p) over time, but i'll beat the average investor. by staying in low cost funds (my 401(k) s&p fund charges .05% annual expense) i'll be ahead of the investors paying planner fees, and mutual fund fees on top of that. you don't need to be a cfp to manage your money, but it would help you understand the absurdity of the system.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "does the premium of an option of a certain strike price increase at a slower rate from otm to itm as gamma affects delta?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if we assume constant volatility, gamma increases as the stock gets closer to the strike price. thus, delta is increasing at a faster rate as the stock reaches closer to itm because gamma is the derivative of delta. as the stock gets deeper itm, the gamma will slow down as delta reaches 1 or -1 (depends if a call or a put). thus, the value of the option will change depending upon the level of the delta. i am ignoring volatility and time for this description. see this diagram from investopedia: gamma", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "at what interest rate should debt be used as a tool?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "it's tough to borrow fixed and invest risk free. that said, there are still some interesting investment opportunities. a 4% loan will cost you 3% or less after tax, and the dvy (dow high yielders) is at 3.36% but at a 15% favored rate, you net 2.76% if my math is right. so for .5%, you get the fruits of the potential rise in dividends as well as any cap gains. is this failsafe? no. but i believe that long term, say 10 years or more, the risk is minimal.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "are there any investment strategies which take advantage of an in-the-money option price that incorporates no time value?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you asked for strategies which use deep in the money options: dividend mispricing can use deep in the money options, basically its an arbitrage play on ex-dividend dates. and any kind of spread can use deep in the money options, depending on how wide you want your spread to be", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "expecting to move in five years; how to lock mortgage rates?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if interest rates have gone up, don't sell when you move. refinance to lock in a low rate and rent out your current house when you move. let the rent pay your new mortgage.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "average price of a stock", "role": "user" }, { "content": "edit3: regarding the usefulness of the bare number itself, it is not useful unless, for example, an employer uses that average in the computation of how many options the employer grants to the employee as part of the compensation paid. one of my employers used just such an average. what is far more common is to use two or more moving averages, of different periods, plotted on a chart. my original response continues below... assuming there are 252 trading days a year, the following chart does what you have done but with a moving average: aapl on stockcharts.com edit: btw, i looked up the number of federal holidays, there are 9. the average year has 365.2422 days. 365.2422 × 5/7 = 260.8873. subtract 9 and you get 251.8873 trading days in the average year. so 252 is a better number for the sma than 250 if you want to average a year. edit2: here is the same chart with more than one average included: aapl chart w/indicators", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "who owns nasdaq? does it collect fees from stock transactions?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "nasdaq omx group owns nasdaq, a stock exchange. it is a corporation, and is listed on the nasdaq as ndaq. it makes money by: source nasdaq also charges for market data services, found in the nasdaq \"datastore\". other information about the fees charged by nyse and nasdaq may be found in the investopedia article the nyse and nasdaq: how they work.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "one of my stocks dropped 40% in 2 days, how should i mentally approach this?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "did you read soichiro honda's biography? he is the founder of honda motor. his plant was destroyed by an earthquake, and then he proceeded to build another factory which, as world war ii broke out, was lost again with his money, and many of his friends', but he started again.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "question about tax information from a prospectus", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a mutual fund could make two different kinds of distributions to you: capital gains: when the fund liquidates positions that it holds, it may realize a gain if it sells the assets for a greater price than the fund purchased them for. as an example, for an index fund, assets may get liquidated if the underlying index changes in composition, thus requiring the manager to sell some stocks and purchase others. mutual funds are required to distribute most of their income that they generate in this way back to its shareholders; many often do this near the end of the calendar year. when you receive the distribution, the gains will be categorized as either short-term (the asset was held for less than one year) or long-term (vice versa). based upon the holding period, the gain is taxed differently. currently in the united states, long-term capital gains are only taxed at 15%, regardless of your income tax bracket (you only pay the capital gains tax, not the income tax). short-term capital gains are treated as ordinary income, so you will pay your (probably higher) tax rate on any cash that you are given by your mutual fund. you may also be subject to capital gains taxes when you decide to sell your holdings in the fund. any profit that you made based on the difference between your purchase and sale price is treated as a capital gain. based upon the period of time that you held the mutual fund shares, it is categorized as a short- or long-term gain and is taxed accordingly in the tax year that you sell the shares. dividends: many companies pay dividends to their stockholders as a way of returning a portion of their profits to their collective owners. when you invest in a mutual fund that owns dividend-paying stocks, the fund is the \"owner\" that receives the dividend payments. as with capital gains, mutual funds will redistribute these dividends to you periodically, often quarterly or annually. the main difference with dividends is that they are always taxed as ordinary income, no matter how long you (or the fund) have held the asset. i'm not aware of texas state tax laws, so i can't comment on your other question.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is being a landlord a good idea? is there a lot of risk?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "rather than thinking of becoming a landlord as a passive \"investment\" (like a bank account or mutual fund), it may be useful to think of it as \"starting a small part-time business\". while certainly many people can and do start their own businesses, and there are many success stories, there are many cases where things don't work out quite as they hoped. i wouldn't call starting any new business \"low risk\", even one that isn't expected to be one's main full-time job, though some may be \"acceptable risk\" for your particular circumstances. but if you're going to start a part-time business, is there any particular reason you'd do so in real estate as opposed to some other activity? it sounds like you'd be completely new to real estate, so perhaps for your first business you're starting you'd want it to be something you're more familiar with. or, if you do want to enter the real estate world (or any other new business), be sure to do a lot of research, come up with a business plan, and be prepared for the possibility of losing money as with any investment or new business.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "if the former owner of my home is still using the address, can it harm me?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "don't worry about it. one of the big banks who like to whine a lot about defaulting borrowers is sending credit cards to a former resident of my home. the guy died in the late 90s.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "first time homeowner and getting a mortgage?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "first of all, think of anyone you know in your circle locally who may have gotten a mortgage recently. ask him, her, or them for a recommendation on what brokers they found helpful and most of all priced competitively. second of all, you may consider asking a real estate agent. note that this is generally discouraged because agents sometimes (and sometimes justifiably) get a bad reputation for doing anything to get themselves the highest commission possible, and so folks want to keep the lender from knowing the agent. yet if you have a reputable, trustworthy agent, he or she can point you to a reputable, trustworthy broker who has been quoting your agent's other clients great rates. third of all, make sure to check out the rates at places you might not expect - for example, any credit unions you or your spouse might have access to. credit unions often offer very competitive rates and fees. after you have 2-3 brokers lined up, visit them all within a short amount of time (edit courtesy of the below comments, which show that 2 weeks has been quoted but that it may be less). the reason to visit them close together is that in the pre-approval process you will be getting your credit hard pulled, which means that your score will be dinged a bit. visiting them all close together tells the bureaus to count all the hits as one new potential credit line instead of a couple or several, and so your score gets dinged less. ask about rates, fees (they are required by law to give you what is called a good faith estimate of their final fees), if pre-payment of the loan is allowed (required to re-finance or for paying off early), alternative schedules (such as bi-weekly or what a 20 year mortgage rate might be), the amortization schedule for your preferred loan, and ask for references from past clients. pick a broker not only who has the best rates but also who appears able to be responsive if you need something quickly in order to close on a great deal.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how to pay bills for one month while waiting for new job?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a traditional bank is not likely to give you a loan if you have no source of income. credit card application forms also ask for your current income level and may reject you based on not having a job. you might want to make a list of income and expenses and look closely at which expenses can be reduced or eliminated. use 6 months of your actual bills to calculate this list. also make a list of your assets and liabilities. a sheet that lists income/expenses and assets/liabilities is called a financial statement. this is the most basic tool you'll need to get your expenses under control. there are many other options for raising capital to pay for your monthly expenses: sell off your possessions that you no longer need or can't afford ask for short term loan help from family and friends advertise for short term loan help on websites such as kijiji start a part-time business doing something that you like and people need. tutoring, dog-walking, photography, you make the list and pick from it. look into unemployment insurance. apply as soon as you are out of work. the folks at the unemployment office are willing to answer all your questions and help you get what you need. dip into your retirement fund. to reduce your expenses, here are a few things you may not have considered: if you own your home, make an appointment with your bank to discuss renegotiation of your mortgage payments. the bank will be more interested in helping you before you start missing payments than after. depending on how much equity you have in your home, you may be able to significantly reduce payments by extending the life of the mortgage. your banker will be impressed if you can bring them a balance sheet that shows your assets, liabilities, income and expenses. as above, for car payments as well. call your phone, cable, credit card, and internet service providers and tell them you want to cancel your service. this will immediately connect you to customer retention. let them know that you are having a hard time paying your bill and will either have to negotiate a lower payment or cancel the service. this tactic can significantly reduce your payments. when you have your new job, there are some things you can do to make sure this doesn't happen again: set aside 10% of your income in a savings account. have it automatically deducted from your income at source if you can. 75% of americans are 4 weeks away from bankruptcy. you can avoid this by forcing yourself to save enough to manage your household finances for 3 - 6 months, a year is better. if you own your own home, take out a line of credit against it based on the available equity. your bank can help you with that. it won't cost you anything as long as you don't use it. this is emergency money; do not use it for vacations or car repairs. there will always be little emergencies in life, this line of credit is not for that. pay off your credit cards and loans, most expensive rate first. use 10% of your income to do this. when the first one is paid off, use the 10% plus the interest you are now saving to pay off the next most expensive card/loan. create a budget you can stick to. you can find a great budget calculator here: http://www.gailvazoxlade.com/resources/interactive_budget_worksheet.html note i have no affiliation with the above-mentioned site, and have a great respect for this woman's ability to teach people about how to handle money.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how to see a portfolio's overall profit or loss on yahoo finance?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the steps that i could imagine following:", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can a company which is listed at otc and tsx considered to be serious?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the assumption that companies listed otc are not serious is far from the truth. many companies on the otc are just starting off there because they don't meet the requirements to be listed on the nasdaq or nyse. major stock exchanges like the nasdaq and the nyse only want the best companies to trade on their exchanges.the nasdaq, for example, has three sets of listing requirements. a company must meet at least one of the three requirement sets, as well as the main rules for all companies. these include: now don't assume that the otc doesn't have rules either, as this is far from the truth as well. while there are no minimum level of revenue, profits or assets required to get listed on the otc there are requirements for audited financial statements and ongoing filing and reporting to the sec and nasd. additionally there are several different levels of the otc, including the otcqx, the otccb and the otc pink, each with their own set of requirements. for more information about what it takes to be listed on otc look here: http://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/otc-trading a company deciding to trade on the otc is making the decision to take their company public, and they are investing to make it happen. currently the fees to get listed on the otc range from $30,000 to $150,000 depending on the firm you decide to go with and the services they offer as part as their package. now, i know i wouldn't consider $30k (or more) to not be serious money! when i looked into the process of getting a company listed on the tsx the requirements seemed a lot more relaxed than those of the major u.s. markets as well, consisting of an application, records submission and then a decision made by a tsx committee about whether you get listed. more information about the tsx here: http://apps.tmx.com/en/listings/listing_with_us/process/index.html i think the way that the otc markets have gotten such a bad reputation is from these \"get rich on penny stock\" companies that you see pumping up otc company stocks and getting massive amounts of people to buy without doing their due diligence and investigating the company and reading its prospectus. then when they loose a bunch of money on an ill-informed investment decision they blame it on the company being an otc stock. whether you decide to trade the otc market or not, i wouldn't make a decision based on how many exchanges the company is listed on, but rather based on the research you do into the company.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "who can truly afford luxury cars?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "most of the people i know that own them are slightly older, and thus in their prime earning years, and many have paid off their homes. that can free up $1000 a month or more in monthly expenses, which would easily cover a nice luxury car payment. if you've got it, and are into cars, why not? what's the point in having the biggest tombstone in the graveyard?", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "give free budgeting advice", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the counsel of a friend doesn't come with a legal or professional liability. the key to doing this sort of thing successfully is to respect boundaries. you are providing advice and discussion, not taking over your friend's life.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what happens if one brings more than 10,000 usd with them into the us?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "bad plan. this seems like a recipe for having your money taken away from you by cbp. let me explain the biases which make it so. us banking is reliable enough for the common citizen, that everyone simply uses banks. to elaborate, americans who are unbanked either can't produce simple identity paperwork; or they got an account but then got blacklisted for overdrawing it. these are problems of the poor, not millionaires. outside of determined \"off the grid\" folks with political reasons to not be in the banking and credit systsm, anyone with money uses the banking system. who's not a criminal, anyway. we also have strong laws against money laundering: turning cash (of questionable origin) into \"sanitized\" cash on deposit in a bank. the most obvious trick is deposit $5000/day for 200 days. nope, that's structuring: yeah, we have a word for that. a guy with $1 million cash, it is presumed he has no choice: he can't convert it into a bank deposit, as in this problem - note where she says she can't launder it. if it's normal for people in your country to haul around cash, due to a defective banking system, you're not the only one with that problem, and nearby there'll be a country with a good banking system who understands your situation. deposit it there. then retain a us lawyer who specializes in this, and follow his advice about moving the money to the us via funds transfer. even then, you may have some explaining to do; but far less than with cash. (and keep in mind for those politically motivated off-the-financial-grid types, they're a bit crazy but definitely not stupid, live a cash life everyday, and know the law better than anybody. they would definitely consider using banks and funds transfers for the border crossing proper, because of customs. then they'll turn it into cash domestically and close the accounts.)", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is it worth investing in index fund, bond index fund and gold at the same time?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "index funds can be a very good way to get into the stock market. it's a lot easier, and cheaper, to buy a few shares of an index fund than it is to buy a few shares in hundreds of different companies. an index fund will also generally charge lower fees than an \"actively managed\" mutual fund, where the manager tries to pick which stocks to invest for you. while the actively managed fund might give you better returns (by investing in good companies instead of every company in the index) that doesn't always work out, and the fees can eat away at that advantage. (stocks, on average, are expected to yield an annual return of 4%, after inflation. consider that when you see an expense ratio of 1%. index funds should charge you more like 0.1%-0.3% or so, possibly more if it's an exotic index.) the question is what sort of index you're going to invest in. the standard and poor's 500 (s&p 500) is a major index, and if you see someone talking about the performance of a mutual fund or investment strategy, there's a good chance they'll compare it to the return of the s&p 500. moreover, there are a variety of index funds and exchange-traded funds that offer very good expense ratios (e.g. vanguard's etf charges ~0.06%, very cheap!). you can also find some funds which try to get you exposure to the entire world stock market, e.g. vanguard total world stock etf, nyse:vt). an index fund is probably the ideal way to start a portfolio - easy, and you get a lot of diversification. later, when you have more money available, you can consider adding individual stocks or investing in specific sectors or regions. (someone else suggested brazil/russia/indo-china, or brics - having some money invested in that region isn't necessarily a bad idea, but putting all or most of your money in that region would be. if brics are more of your portfolio then they are of the world economy, your portfolio isn't balanced. also, while these countries are experiencing a lot of economic growth, that doesn't always mean that the companies that you own stock in are the ones which will benefit; small businesses and new ventures may make up a significant part of that growth.) bond funds are useful when you want to diversify your portfolio so that it's not all stocks. there's a bunch of portfolio theory built around asset allocation strategies. the idea is that you should try to maintain a target mix of assets, whatever the market's doing. the basic simplified guideline about investing for retirement says that your portfolio should have (your age)% in bonds (e.g. a 30-year-old should have 30% in bonds, a 50-year-old 50%.) this helps maintain a balance between the volatility of your portfolio (the stock market's ups and downs) and the rate of return: you want to earn money when you can, but when it's almost time to spend it, you don't want a sudden stock market crash to wipe it all out. bonds help preserve that value (but don't have as nice of a return). the other idea behind asset allocation is that if the market changes - e.g. your stocks go up a lot while your bonds stagnate - you rebalance and buy more bonds. if the stock market subsequently crashes, you move some of your bond money back into stocks. this basically means that you buy low and sell high, just by maintaining your asset allocation. this is generally more reliable than trying to \"time the market\" and move into an asset class before it goes up (and move out before it goes down). market-timing is just speculation. you get better returns if you guess right, but you get worse returns if you guess wrong. commodity funds are useful as another way to diversify your portfolio, and can serve as a little bit of protection in case of crisis or inflation. you can buy gold, silver, platinum and palladium etfs on the stock exchanges. having a small amount of money in these funds isn't a bad idea, but commodities can be subject to violent price swings! moreover, a bar of gold doesn't really earn any money (and owning a share of a precious-metals etf will incur administrative, storage, and insurance costs to boot). a well-run business does earn money. assuming you're saving for the long haul (retirement or something several decades off) my suggestion for you would be to start by investing most of your money* in index funds to match the total world stock market (with something like the aforementioned nyse:vt, for instance), a small portion in bonds, and a smaller portion in commodity funds. (for all the negative stuff i've said about market-timing, it's pretty clear that the bond market is very expensive right now, and so are the commodities!) then, as you do additional research and determine what sort investments are right for you, add new investment money in the places that you think are appropriate - stock funds, bond funds, commodity funds, individual stocks, sector-specific funds, actively managed mutual funds, et cetera - and try to maintain a reasonable asset allocation. have fun. *(most of your investment money. you should have a separate fund for emergencies, and don't invest money in stocks if you know you're going need it within the next few years).", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do i owe taxes if my deductions are higher than my income?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i'm going to echo phil and say that you should add more information. that being said, i think it is possible for you to owe the government that much. if you received a federal health insurance subsidy and live in a state that didn't expand medicaid, you could have received a subsidy through out the year that you did not end up qualifying for. it appears you are outside the medicaid limit of 133% of the poverty level($11,670) or $15,521. if you received a subsidy of $275 a month from the marketplace, you would have received $3300 worth of aid from the government that you don't qualify for. now they are expecting you to pay it back.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what to sell when your financial needs change, stocks or bonds?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "you are right about the stock and index funds, with dollar cost averaging over several years, the daily price of the security (especially a dividend paying security) will not matter* because your position will have accumulated larger over several entry points, some entries with cheaper shares and some entries with more expensive shares. in the future your position will be so large that any uptick will net you large gains on your original equity. *not matter being a reference to even extreme forms of volatility. but if you had all your equity in a poor company and tanked, never to rise again, then you would still be in a losing position even with dollar cost averaging. if your only other holdings are bonds, then you may want to sell those to free up capital.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why do stocks gap up after a buyout is announced?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the \"random walk\" that you describe reflects the nature of the information flow about the value of a stock. if the flow is just little bits of relatively unimportant information (including information about the broader market and the investor pool), you will get small and seemingly random moves, which may look like a meander. if an important bit of information comes out, like a merger, you will see a large and immediate move, which may not look as random. however, the idea that small moves are a meander of search and discovery and large moves are immediate agreements is incorrect. both small moves and large moves are instantaneous agreements about the value of a stock in the form of a demand/supply equilibrium. as a rule, neither is predictable from the point of view of a single investor, but they are not actually random. they look different from each other only because of the size of the movement, not because of an underlying difference in how the consensus price is reached.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "should i sell when my stocks are growing?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "if you feel comfortable taking an 8% gain on your stocks, then yes, you should sell. it is generally a good idea to know when you want to sell (either a price or %) before you ever actually buy the stocks. that helps from getting emotional and making poor decisions.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "question about data from ftse 100", "role": "user" }, { "content": "open, high, low, close, volume. the hint is that volume on new years day is 0. dc's comment is actually a better answer than mine - when given any data set, you should really know the meaning of each cell/number.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can someone help me understand my student loans?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "first to actually answer the question \"how long at these rates/payments?\"- these is nothing magic or nefarious about what the bank is doing. they add accrued interest and take your payment off the new total. i'd make higher payments to the 8.75% debt until it's gone, $100/mo extra and be done. the first debt, if you bump it to $50 will be paid in 147 months, at $75/mo, 92 months. everything you pay above the minimum goes right to the principal balance and gets you closer to paying it off. the debt snowball is not the ideal way to pay off your debt. say i have one 24% credit card the bank was nice enough to give me a $20,000 line of credit on. i also have 20 cards each with $1000 in credit, all at 6%. the snowball dictates that the smallest debt be paid first, so while i pay the minimum on the 24% card, the 6% cards get paid off one by one, but i'm supposed to feel good about the process, as i reduce the number of cards every few months. the correct way to line up debt is to pay off the (tax adjusted) highest rate first, as an extra $100 to the 24% card saves you $2/mo vs 50 cents/mo for the 6% cards. i wrote an article discussing the debt snowball which links to a calculator where you can see the difference in methods. i note that if the difference from lowest to highest rate is small, the snowball method will only cost you a small amount more. if, by coincidence, the balances are close, the difference will also be small. the above aside, it's the rest of your situation that will tell you the right path for you. for example, a matched 401(k) deposit should take priority over most debt repayment. the $11,000 might be better conserved for a house downpayment as that $66/mo is student loan and won't count as the housing debt, rather \"other debt\" and part of the higher ratio when qualifying for the mortgage. if you already have taken this into account, by all means, pay off the 8.75% debt asap, then start paying off the 3% faster. keep in mind, this is likely the lowest rate debt one can have and once paid off, you can't withdraw it again. so it's important to consider the big picture first. (are you depositing to a retirement account? is it a 401(k) and are you getting any matching from the company?)", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "does a stock's price represent current liquidation of all shares?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "what if everyone decided to sell all the shares at a given moment, let's say when the stock is trading at $40? it would fall to the lowest bid price, which could be $0.01 if someone had that bid in place. here is an example which i happened to find online: notice there are orders to buy at half the market price and lower... probably all the way down to pennies. if there were enough selling activity to fill all of those bids you see, then the market price would be the lowest bid on the screen. alternatively, the bid orders could be pulled (cancelled), which would also let the price free-fall to the lowest bid even if there were few actual sellers. bid-stuffing is what hft (high frequency trading) algorithms sometimes do, which some say caused the flash crash of may 2010. the computers \"stuff\" bids into the order book, making it look like there is demand in order to trigger a market reaction, then they pull the bids to make the market fall. this sort of thing happens all the time and nanex documents it http://www.nanex.net/flashcrash/ongoingresearch.html quote stuffing defined: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quote-stuffing.asp i remember the day of the flash crash very well. i found this video on youtube of cnbc at that time. watch from the 5:00 min mark on the video as jim crammer talks about pg easily not being worth the price of the market at that time. he said \"who cares?\", \"its not a real price\", \"$49.25 bid for 50,000 shares if i were at my hedge fund.\" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86g4_w4j3ju you can value a stock how you want, but its only actually worth what someone will give you for it. more examples: anadarko petroleum, which as we noted in today's eod post, lost $45 billion in market cap in 45 milliseconds (a collapse rate of $1 billion per millisecond), flash crashing from $90 all the way to an (allegedly illegal) stub quote of $0.01. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-17/how-last-second-flash-crash-pushed-sp-500-1667-1666 how 10,000 contracts crashed the market: a visual deconstruction of last night's e-mini flash crash http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-12-21/how-10000-contracts-crashed-market-visual-deconstruction-last-nights-e-mini-flash-cr symantec flash-crash destroys over $1.5 billion in less than a second http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-30/symantec-flash-crash-destroys-over-15-billion-less-second this sort of thing happens so often, i don't pay much attention anymore.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "when buying a call option, is the financial stability of the option writer relevant?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in the case of regulated, exchange-traded options, the writer of an options contract is obliged to maintain a margin with their broker, and the broker is obliged to maintain a margin with the clearing house. (institutional writers of options will deal directly with the clearing house.) in the event that the writer is unable to make a daily margin call, the broker (or clearing house) may automatically close out (all of) their positions using existing margin held. if there was a shortfall, the broker (or clearing house) would be left to persue the client (writer) to make good on their obligations. none of this effects the position of the original buyer of the options contract. effectively, the buyer's counterparty is their broker's clearing house account.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "any tips on how to get the highest returns within 4 months by investing in stocks?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "invest in an etf called spxs and hope for a market correction in the next month. or if you know a lot about markets and trends, select from this list of leveraged etfs available from direxion.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can someone explain recent aamrq stock price behavior to me?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "there are things that are clearly beyond me as well. cash per share is $12.61 but the debt looks like $30 or so per share. i look at that, and the $22 negative book value and don't see where the shareholders are able to recoup anything.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "problems with enterprise value and better valuation techniques", "role": "user" }, { "content": "this is a tough question sfun28. let's try and debug the metric. first, let's expand upon the notion share price is determined in an efficient market where prospective buyers and sellers have access to info on an enterprises' cash balance and they may weigh that into their decision making. therefore, a desirable/undesirable cash balance may raise or lower the share price, to what extent, we do not know. we must ask how significant is cash/debt balance in determining the market price of a stock? as you noted, we have limited info, which may decrease the weight of these account balances in our decision process. using a materiality level of 5% of net income of operations, cash/debt may be immaterial or not considered by an investor. investors oftentimes interpret the same information differently (e.g. microsoft's large cash balance may show they no longer have innovative ideas worth investing in, or they are well positioned to acquire innovative companies, or weather a contraction in the sector) my guess is a math mind would ignore the affect of account balances on the equity portion of the enterprise value calculation because it may not be a factor, or because the affect is subjective.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "gigantic point amount on rewards card - what are potential consequences?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "an ideal option for you would be to use as many or as few as you choose, but have all of them available to you. the service desk guy told you you can do exactly that. problem, though: you have no proof that a representative of the company told you that. get proof. recording, written statement, whatever. if writing a letter, make it clear you expect a response. the time you spend \"being a good guy\" is not free, you should get something for it. no idea how to go about that - mentioning the service desk guy in a letter might give him trouble. maybe suggest that you could allow your image to be used in a short advertising campaign, as thanks. but whatever you do get, enjoy it. consequences? any number of things can happen, from lifetime free meals to court cases, negative points and being banned, regardless of who is right, legally or morally. someone in management there might still choose to burden you with responsibility even if their own ceo declared you a saint and lifetime customer of honor. but you might never get to that bridge. for now, get proof, and use what points you know are yours anyway.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "if i want to take cash from portugal to the usa, should i exchange my money before leaving or after arriving?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i would just rely on the salary from my job in the us. if you don't have a job in the us, you're very unlikely to get a visa to move there and look for work, and so the question of how to take money there (except for a holiday) doesn't arise. (unless you have dual portuguese/american citizenship.)", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "ways to save for child's college education where one need not commit to set contributions? [duplicate]", "role": "user" }, { "content": "since this post was migrated from parenting, my reply was in the context where it appeared to be misrepresenting facts to make a point. i've edited it to be more concise to my main point. in my opinion, the best way to save for your childs future is to get rid of as much of your own debt as possible. starting today. for the average american, a car is 6-10%. most people have at least a couple credit cards, ranging from 10-25% (no crap). college loans can be all over the map (5-15%) as can be signature (8-15%) or secured bank loans (4-8%). try to stop living within your credit and live within your means. yeah it will suck to not go to movies or shop for cute things at kohl's, but only today. first, incur no more debt. then, the easiest way i found to pay things off is to use your tax returns and reduce your cable service (both potentially $ks per year) to pay off a big debt like a car or student loan. you just gave yourself an immediate raise of whatever your payment is. if you think long term (we're talking about long-term savings for a childs college) there are things you can do to pay off debt and save money without having to take up a 2nd job... but you have to think in terms of years, not months. is this kind of thing pie in the sky? yes and no, but it takes a plan and diligence. for example, we have no tv service (internet only service redirected an additional $100/mo to the wifes lone credit card) and we used '12 taxes to pay off the last 4k on the car. we did the same thing on our van last year. it takes willpower to not cheat, but that's only really necessary for the first year-ish... well before that point you'll be used to the atkins diet on your wallet and will have no desire to cheat. it doesn't really hurt your quality of life (do you really need 5 hbo channels?) and it sets everyone up for success down the line. the moral of the story is that by paying down your debt today, you're taking steps to reduce long haul expenditures. a stable household economy is a tremendous foundation for raising children and can set you up to be more able to deal with the costs of higher ed.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "what does f[yy]e mean in reporting", "role": "user" }, { "content": "it means it's estimate and not final numbers and generally used for future years", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do americans really use checks that often?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "sorry for this late reply. i currently live in iceland (i am a united statesian). people here told me they thought checks were just something that were in movies. i was amazed by this. so here are some reasons that i see to being why it works still in the usa. 1. social security system. most euro, nordic countries have their lives, bank accounts, ect tied to their 'social security' number and that number is not top secret like it is in the usa. in fact here in iceland you throw your number around to anyone who wants it because they cant do anything with it but pay you money really. 2. banks. in the usa there are millions, millions of small town banks. that means that doing direct deposits or transfers is much much harder to achieve. example: iceland has two banks. the most common way of loaning a friend money or paying for that hotel room if you forgot to bring cash or your card is to say 'give me your ssn and i will transfer to you'. it takes about 30 seconds to do a funds transfer. in the usa you can't do that. they would think you are lying or not want to give they bank info or because of the fees from small town banks it would be pointless. also a lot of these small banks will not accept direct deposit (i had a bank growing up that still does not) these are some of the main reasons that i think cause the flow of checks in the usa.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "are my parents ripping me off with this deal that doesn't allow me to build my equity in my home?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "basically, you have purchased 25% of the condo for $40,000, and your parents bought 75% of the condo for another $115,000. we imagine for a moment that it wasn't you who lived in the condo, but some unrelated person paying rent. you are paying $7,500 a year for tax and fees, plus $6,000 a year, so there is $13,500 leaving your wallet. if $15,500 a year was a reasonable rent, then the tax and fee would be paid out of that, there would be $8,000 left, of which you would get 25% = $2,000. if you were officially \"renting\" it, you would pay $15,500 a year, and get $2,000 back, again $13,500 leaving your wallet. so you are in exact the same situation financially as you would be if you paid $15,500 rent. question: is $15,500 a year or $1,290 a month an appropriate rent for your condo? if a neighbour is renting his condo, is he or she paying $1,290 or more or less? could you rent the same place for the same money? if $1,290 is the correct rent then you are fine. if the rent should be lower, then you are overpaying. if the rent should be higher, then you are making money. keep in mind that you will also be winning if rents go up in the future.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "do i pay taxes on a gift of mutual funds?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i gift my daughter stock worth $1000. no tax issue. she sells it for $2000, and has a taxable gain of $1000 that shows up on her return. yes, you need to find out the date of the gift, as that is the date you value the fund for cost basis. the $3500 isn't a concern, as the gift seems to have been given well before that. it's a long term capital gain when you sell it. and, in a delightfully annoying aspect of our code, the dividends get added to basis each year, as you were paying tax on the dividend whether or not you actually received it. depending on the level of dividends, your basis may very well be as high as the $6500 current value. (pls ask if anything here needs clarification)", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how can i legally and efficiently help my girlfriend build equity by helping with a mortgage?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "have her pay something like a friendly monthly rent. this should be less than half of the monthly mortgage cost, since you are assuming the risk (and benefits) of a mortgage and closer to the rent of similar places near you. for when you get married and she is to have half the apartment, have a pre-agreed way to calculate a lump-sum that she needs to provide to match your own contributions up to that time, as if you two had equal contributions from the beginning. the financially precise way to do it would be to have her pay more than the mere sum of the amount (since she will be providing the amount at a later time than you), but i would be generous and skip this in your place if the difference is not too big. if you break up, she will have payed what would be a fair amount of rent, as if you two were renting, so, in this sense, it is fair that she would not have a claim on the apartment. in case that you two would like that she keeps the apartment, you can just sell it to her, having her pay this same amount as above and assume responsibility for the rest of the mortgage.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why do some people say a house not an investment?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "one reason i have heard (beside to keep you paying rent) is the cost of maintenance and improvements. if you hire someone else to do all the work for you, then it may very well be the case, though it is not as bad as a car. many factors come into play: if you are lucky, you may end up with a lot that is worth more than the house on it in a few decades' time. personally, i feel that renting is sometimes better than owning depending on the local market. that said, when you own a home, it is yours. you do have to weigh in such factors as being tied down to a certain location to some extent. however, only the police can barge in -- under certain circumstances -- where as a landlord can come in whenever they feel like, given proper notice or an \"emergency.\" not to mention that if someone slams a door so hard that it reverberates through the entire place, you can actually deal with it. the point of this last bit is the question of home ownership vs renting is rather subjective. objectively, the costs associated with home ownership are the drags that may make it a bad investment. however, it is not like car ownership, which is quite honestly rarely an invesment.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how much does a landlord pay in taxes?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "i'd recommend you use an online tax calculator to see the effect it will have. to your comment with @littleadv, there's fmv, agreed, but there's also a rate below that. one that's a bit lower than fmv, but it's a discount for a tenant who will handle certain things on their own. i had an arm's length tenant, who was below fmv, i literally never met him. but, our agreement through a realtor, was that for any repairs, i was not required to arrange or meet repairmen. fmv is not a fixed number, but a bit of a range. if this is your first rental, you need to be aware of the requirement to take depreciation. simply put, you separate your cost into land and house. the house value gets depreciated by 1/27.5 (i.e. you divide the value by 27.5 and that's taken as depreciation each year. you may break even on cash flow, the rent paying the mortgage, property tax, etc, but the depreciation might still produce a loss. this isn't optional. it flows to your tax return, and is limited to $25k/yr. further, if your adjusted gross income is over $100k, the allowed loss is phased out over the next $50k of income. i.e. each $1000 of agi reduces the allowed loss by $500. the losses you can't take are carried forward, until you use them to offset profit each year, or sell the property. if you offer numbers, you'll get a more detailed answer, but this is the general overview. in general, if you are paying tax, you are doing well, running a profit even after depreciation.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is investments by bodie just an expanded version of essentials of investments?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "they are actually both undergraduate texts; however, investments is far more complex. essentials of investments really waters down the statistical and mathematical notation while investments does not. investments also has an entire section (4-5 chapters) called options, futures, and other derivatives while essentials of investments does not. [of course, if you want to learn about options, futures, and other derivatives, there is a seminal book by john hull with that exact title.] that notwithstanding, neither book is sophisticated enough to be considered a true graduate school textbook in quantitative investment theory. no grad schools worth their salt are going to rely too heavily on investments in a specialized finance curriculum. it's a great book to start out, though.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "can company owners use lay offs to prevent restricted stock from vesting before an acquisition?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "depending on your local laws, such a layoff may be an unlawful act. if the whole purpose of the lay-off is to strip the employees of their rsu's, the employer may be liable and get sued. however, you have to check that with a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction. in many places there are no laws against this. in any case, you may claim that there was no good faith/just cause in the action and still sue the employer. mere threat of a lawsuit may thwart the whole deal, so i suggest the employees to lawyer up and talk to the employer. that, by the way, will require to create a union - a representative body for the employees. in some places that by itself may be a just cause for termination (in some extremely anti-union jurisdictions, i would guess if there were some they would be in the us). bottom line - talk to a lawyer.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "is trading stocks easier than trading commodities?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "one reason why you may have gotten this advice is that stocks have an expected real return over time, while commodities do not. therefore, when gambling on individual stocks, odds are in your favor that they will ultimately go up over time. you may do better or worse than the market as a whole, but they will likely go up as the whole market, on average, rises over time. commodities, on the other hand, have no expected real return. it is more zero-sum. in fact, after costs, a real loss should be expected on average, making gambling in here more risky.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "why do gas stations charge different amounts in the same local area?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "some of this is demand management. the local bj's wholesale club sells gas $0.10-0.15/gallon less than the prevailing rate. typically there are lines of 3-5 cars waiting for a pump during busy periods. people are price-conscious when buying gas, which draws crowds and the retailer actually wants a line -- the whole point of the gas station is to draw traffic to the warehouse club. other gas stations have the opposite problem -- big crowds lead to fewer people buying food and drinks in the convenience store, which is where the business actually makes its money. they want a steady stream of people. in my area, there is a gas station that is on a busy intersection right off the highway ramp going to the airport. their problem is that people returning rental cars used to swarm the gas station and cause traffic tie-ups on the road -- a problem averted by marking up the gas $0.30.", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "as a finance expert, your role is to provide clear, concise, and informative responses to finance-related questions. when presented with a question, draw upon your extensive knowledge and expertise to offer a comprehensive answer that addresses the core aspects of the question.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "how do i deal with a mistaken attempt to collect a debt from me that is owed by someone else?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "it may be a scam. but it also may be a company trying to find a person with the same or similar name. they may have followed a trail to her old address, and still not have the correct person. they bought number of old debts at a large discount, and are trying to track down any money they can find. it is best to ignore it, especially if they know it isn't their debt. if they start providing more proof then get interested. if they keep contacting them tell them there is no business relationship and they should stop.", "role": "assistant" } ]