README.md

---
configs:
- config_name: experiment1
  data_files:
  - split: test
    path:
    - data/eval/experiment1.jsonl
  default: true
- config_name: experiment2
  data_files:
  - split: test
    path:
    - data/eval/experiment2.jsonl
- config_name: experiment3
  data_files:
  - split: test
    path:
    - data/eval/experiment3.jsonl
- config_name: experiment4
  data_files:
  - split: test
    path:
    - data/eval/experiment4.jsonl
license: cc-by-4.0
extra_gated_prompt: You agree to not upload this data publicly without the author's consent.
extra_gated_fields:
  Company: text
  Country: country
  I want to use this dataset for:
    type: select
    options:
    - Research
    - Education
    - Product
    - label: Other
      value: other
task_categories:
- question-answering
language:
- en
tags:
- Logical Reasoning
- Propositional Logic
- Deductive Reasoning
size_categories:
- n<1K
---
<p align="center"><h1>Strategies in Sentential Reasoning</h1></p>

This dataset repository synthesizes the problems of propositional logic introduced in *Strategies in Sentential Reasoning* by [Van der Henst et al. (2002)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021302000745).

The repository contains data for four different experiments, each designed to analyze the different strategies individuals employ in propositional logic.
The data for each experiment is given as a distinct subset of the data repository. For additional details about the data, we refer to the original study by [Van der Henst et al. (2002)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021302000745). 

### Comparing Inferential Strategies of Humans and Large Language Models in Deductive Reasoning
In our recent [paper]((https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021302000745)) we replicate the first experiment of [Van der Henst et al. (2002)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021302000745) to examine inferential strategies employed by large language models (LLMs). Our findings indicate that LLMs display reasoning patterns akin to those observed in humans. 


## Cite
```
@misc{mondorf2024comparing,
      title={Comparing Inferential Strategies of Humans and Large Language Models in Deductive Reasoning}, 
      author={Philipp Mondorf and Barbara Plank},
      year={2024},
      eprint={2402.14856},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
```

##  References
[1] Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst, Yingrui Yang, and P.n. Johnson-Laird. 2002. [Strategies in sentential reasoning](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021302000745). Cognitive Science, 26(4):425–468.