Datasets:

SantiagoPG

/

ocr_texts

like 0

what is the date mentioned in this letter?

xnbl0037

xnbl0037_p0, xnbl0037_p1

1/8/93

camel special Lights statement and Q&As December 1992 general Statement In April 1993, came) Special Lights will be nationally introduced to offer smokers) a mid lights taste choice from Camel. Camel Special Lights the first Camel style with white tipping. *com Camel special sight will be available nationally in thing Boy and 1001 box styles. a bing size soft pack will also introduced in selected and pack toales. sare strong). of Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnbl0037

what is the contact person name mentioned in letter?

xnbl0037

xnbl0037_p0, xnbl0037_p1

P. Carter, p. carter

camel special Lights statement and Q&As December 1992 general Statement In April 1993, came) Special Lights will be nationally introduced to offer smokers) a mid lights taste choice from Camel. Camel Special Lights the first Camel style with white tipping. *com Camel special sight will be available nationally in thing Boy and 1001 box styles. a bing size soft pack will also introduced in selected and pack toales. sare strong). of Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnbl0037

Which corporation's letterhead is this?

mxcj0037

mxcj0037_p0

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may incorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one. Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for future smoking. Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. Extremely fast burning cigarette. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037

Who is in cc in this letter?

mxcj0037

mxcj0037_p0

T.F. Riehl

B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may incorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one. Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for future smoking. Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. Extremely fast burning cigarette. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037

what is the subject of this letter?

mxcj0037

mxcj0037_p0

Review of existing Brainstorming Ideas/483

B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may incorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one. Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for future smoking. Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. Extremely fast burning cigarette. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037

What is the number at the bottom of the page, in bold?

mxcj0037

mxcj0037_p0

499150498

B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may incorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one. Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for future smoking. Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. Extremely fast burning cigarette. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037

How many points are there in modifications to readout instrumentation

sxxj0037

sxxj0037_p0, sxxj0037_p1

5, 5.

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To: W.E. Claflin Date: June 19, 1990 From: B. C. LaRoy. & A.T. Burton C90-03342 Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument The second eight-port- apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications made to that instrument relative to the original design. Modifications to the Hood: A modified Lexan® hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and constructed in the R&D Shop. 1. The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow. 2. The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables easier and more frequent window replacement. 3. The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning. 4. The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in this application. These posts were removed during: the modification and the holes for them were eliminated from the new hood design. This allows the rear hood skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders. 5. The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL) to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuation during. the first few runs after the machine has been idle for some time. Modifications in Flow Measurement: 1. A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY1001U007) was placed in the air exit line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037 2. The rotometer in the original design was replaced by a 0-100 SLPM mass flbw meter (Hastings #200B) to provide more precise flow settings. As in the original design, flow. is set before each smoke run by manual adjustment of a 3/4" needle valve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and the flowmeter is bypassed during smoke measurements to minimize contamination. In the new design the mass flowmeter is bypassed during smoke runs by the parallel combination of a 3/4" needle valve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and a length of unrestricted 1/2" piping. The latter valve is adjusted to give an identical pressure drop (as indicated by a cm H. O Dwyer Magnehelic8 gauge) to that- of the mass flowmeter, thus maintaining the flow when the meter is removed from the circuit. Modifications to Readout Instrumentation: 1.. The single turn sensitivity potentiometer supplied on the Oriel #7072 amplifier was replaced with a ten turn potentiometer to allow more precise settings of the zero attenuation level. 2. To reduce noise and drift in the computer data acquisition system, the output voltage divider internal to the Oriel amplifier was altered to increase the instrument's output by a factor of 100. The sensitivities of the computer data system and the parallel strip chart recorder were correspondingly reduced. 3. Signal leads wene re-dressed and shielded to minimize ground loops and RF pickup. The exposed terminal board was eliminated. 4. A running display of output voltage was added to the computer screen as a visual aid to the operaton. 5. Changes to the computer program were made by Randy Greene to eliminate minor operational problems. The changes did not affect the calculation of any reported parameters. Beliky CC: P.N. Gauvin B.L. Goodman A.C. Lilly D.D. McRae E.B. Sanders J.E. Wickham Central Files -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037

what is the date in the letter

nhxj0037

nhxj0037_p0, nhxj0037_p1

June 11, 1990, June 11,1990

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. CON. 1 INTER-OFFICE - CORRESPONDENCI Richmond, Virginia To: Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45- g/m² paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m² papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m², various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m², and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037

To whom this is addressed

nhxj0037

nhxj0037_p0, nhxj0037_p1

Dr.K.S.Houghton

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. CON. 1 INTER-OFFICE - CORRESPONDENCI Richmond, Virginia To: Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45- g/m² paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m² papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m², various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m², and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037

Who sent the letter?

nhxj0037

nhxj0037_p0, nhxj0037_p1

Ted Sanders

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. CON. 1 INTER-OFFICE - CORRESPONDENCI Richmond, Virginia To: Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45- g/m² paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m² papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m², various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m², and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037

Which part of Virginia is this letter sent from

nhxj0037

nhxj0037_p0, nhxj0037_p1

Richmond

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. CON. 1 INTER-OFFICE - CORRESPONDENCI Richmond, Virginia To: Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45- g/m² paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m² papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m², various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m², and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037

What sort of communication/letter is this ?

mxxj0037

mxxj0037_p0

INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE Richmond, Virginia TO: Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From: H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART: S'amples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 20%. and 40% reduced level, control level and 20% increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11. 9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.6% OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.0% OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC'. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 2% substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 5% substitution level in production RCB are in progress. Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred. Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels. has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super. Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION: Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to asses.s 100 mm models from 3. to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.5% filler nicotine is in progress. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037

What is the date mentioned in the letter?

mxxj0037

mxxj0037_p0

April 27, 1990

PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE Richmond, Virginia TO: Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From: H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART: S'amples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 20%. and 40% reduced level, control level and 20% increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11. 9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.6% OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.0% OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC'. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 2% substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 5% substitution level in production RCB are in progress. Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred. Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels. has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super. Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION: Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to asses.s 100 mm models from 3. to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.5% filler nicotine is in progress. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037

Which test is used to evaluate ART menthol levels that has been shipped?

mxxj0037

mxxj0037_p0

A second Danchi Test

PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE Richmond, Virginia TO: Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From: H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART: S'amples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 20%. and 40% reduced level, control level and 20% increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11. 9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.6% OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.0% OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC'. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 2% substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 5% substitution level in production RCB are in progress. Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred. Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels. has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super. Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION: Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to asses.s 100 mm models from 3. to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.5% filler nicotine is in progress. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037

What is the subject of the document/letter?

mxxj0037

mxxj0037_p0

Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990

PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE Richmond, Virginia TO: Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From: H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART: S'amples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 20%. and 40% reduced level, control level and 20% increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11. 9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.6% OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.0% OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC'. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 2% substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 5% substitution level in production RCB are in progress. Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred. Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels. has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super. Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION: Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to asses.s 100 mm models from 3. to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.5% filler nicotine is in progress. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037

what is the index for Retention of Franchise

rzbj0037

rzbj0037_p8, rzbj0037_p9

100, (100)

Consumer Dynamics B&W CARLTON index Retention of Franchise: 81.3% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 9.3% ( 88) Rate of Quitting Losses 9.4% (113) Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 81.9% (116) Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (100) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.1% ( 6) Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037 Consumer Dynamics B&W CAPRI index Retention of Franchise: 79.2% ( 98) Rate of Switching Losses 10.3% ( 97) Rate of Quitting Losses 10.5% (127) Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 83.8% (119) Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (170) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.5% ( 50) Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data ! Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037

What is the source

rzbj0037

rzbj0037_p8, rzbj0037_p9

USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data

Consumer Dynamics B&W CARLTON index Retention of Franchise: 81.3% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 9.3% ( 88) Rate of Quitting Losses 9.4% (113) Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 81.9% (116) Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (100) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.1% ( 6) Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037 Consumer Dynamics B&W CAPRI index Retention of Franchise: 79.2% ( 98) Rate of Switching Losses 10.3% ( 97) Rate of Quitting Losses 10.5% (127) Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 83.8% (119) Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (170) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.5% ( 50) Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data ! Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037

The number mentioned on the right of the leftside margin?

rzbj0037

rzbj0037_p8, rzbj0037_p9

314002838

Consumer Dynamics B&W CARLTON index Retention of Franchise: 81.3% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 9.3% ( 88) Rate of Quitting Losses 9.4% (113) Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 81.9% (116) Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (100) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.1% ( 6) Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037 Consumer Dynamics B&W CAPRI index Retention of Franchise: 79.2% ( 98) Rate of Switching Losses 10.3% ( 97) Rate of Quitting Losses 10.5% (127) Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 83.8% (119) Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (170) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.5% ( 50) Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data ! Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037

what mm Marlboro Menthol were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel

khxj0037

khxj0037_p1, khxj0037_p2

80mm and 83mm

DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Menthol POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL 0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff) close out on June 7, 1990. Best of the Lowest BOLD Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The test is scheduled in make/pack next week. Ambrosia I POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering. Ambrosia II The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have been completed and will be shipped this week, Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270 have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation. Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs during the week of June 11. During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and prevent this occurrence. 2 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Mariboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Mariboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip- release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037

Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for what purpose?

khxj0037

khxj0037_p1, khxj0037_p2

evaluation of lip release

DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Menthol POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL 0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff) close out on June 7, 1990. Best of the Lowest BOLD Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The test is scheduled in make/pack next week. Ambrosia I POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering. Ambrosia II The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have been completed and will be shipped this week, Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270 have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation. Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs during the week of June 11. During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and prevent this occurrence. 2 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Mariboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Mariboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip- release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037

Another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within how many weeks

khxj0037

khxj0037_p1, khxj0037_p2

next 2-3 weeks, within the next 2-3 weeks, 2-3 weeks

DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Menthol POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL 0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff) close out on June 7, 1990. Best of the Lowest BOLD Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The test is scheduled in make/pack next week. Ambrosia I POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering. Ambrosia II The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have been completed and will be shipped this week, Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270 have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation. Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs during the week of June 11. During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and prevent this occurrence. 2 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Mariboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Mariboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip- release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037

Under BOLD, primary production of Blend #24- will be completed by which date

khxj0037

khxj0037_p1, khxj0037_p2

6/7/90

DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Menthol POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL 0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff) close out on June 7, 1990. Best of the Lowest BOLD Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The test is scheduled in make/pack next week. Ambrosia I POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering. Ambrosia II The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have been completed and will be shipped this week, Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270 have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation. Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs during the week of June 11. During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and prevent this occurrence. 2 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Mariboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Mariboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip- release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037

During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holed in which paper

khxj0037

khxj0037_p1, khxj0037_p2

cigarette paper, Cigarette paper

DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Menthol POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL 0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff) close out on June 7, 1990. Best of the Lowest BOLD Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The test is scheduled in make/pack next week. Ambrosia I POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering. Ambrosia II The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have been completed and will be shipped this week, Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270 have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation. Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs during the week of June 11. During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and prevent this occurrence. 2 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Mariboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Mariboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip- release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037

Where was the conference held?

nmcj0037

nmcj0037_p0, nmcj0037_p1

B&W headquarters, B&W Headquarters

In 22.10.14 a Se, Wp MEMORANDUM To: Mr. R. Hugh Honeycutt From: A. J. Baker Subject: The Aerodynamics of Swirl Date: October 1, 1984 SUMMARY The conference on "smoke swirl, held at B&W Headquarters, brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue. DISCUSSION 1. The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the oral cavity. The data on the desirability of one specific configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive. Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs. 2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize all flows that are not unidirectional. is probably an oversimplification. At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod), the data presented by Kelly St. Charles (B&W) and Martin Duke (Southampton) for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence of a time-varying unsteadiness in smoke column stability which results in breakup and nulti-dimensional dispersion. This mechanism appears distinctly different from the "Actron" flowfield, although both indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics. 3. I would suggest that B&W consider a refinement of the associated laboratory experiment designs to geherate discriminating data. one variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert COMCO 3601A Chapman Highway Innoxville, TN 37920 Phone: $15)577-5494 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037 substantial influences. While the oral cavity is indeed a closely coupled effect in reality, I suggest that B&W consider conducting experiments within a test chamber with walls and backplane positioned at significantly larger distances from the smoke column. This may help significantly in firm quantization of the influence of specific filter designs on the resultant flowfield. 4. If the results of these tests, conducted in larger dimension test chambers, confirms that instability of the smoke column, as induced by filter preconditioning, is a potentially viable mechanism for dispersal, theoretical analyses of the turbulent breakup of columnar jets reported in the aerospace literature may help in establishing an understanding of the physics involved in these processes. I am not well versed in this literature, but contacts do exist that might prove useful in establisning such an understanding. COMCO might serve as a useful vchicle for securing this expertise, without the need to divulge significant aspects of the proprietary nature of these designs. 5. Overall, the conference was highly informative on examination of the role that aerodynamics analyses might exert. A continued close correlation of theoretical aspects with laboratory experiments could prove highly useful in design refinement and optimization of specific filter configurations. 32 COMCO 3601A Chapman Highway o Knoxville, TN 37920 Phone: (615)577-5494 1 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037

How many distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield?

nmcj0037

nmcj0037_p0, nmcj0037_p1

At least two, Two

In 22.10.14 a Se, Wp MEMORANDUM To: Mr. R. Hugh Honeycutt From: A. J. Baker Subject: The Aerodynamics of Swirl Date: October 1, 1984 SUMMARY The conference on "smoke swirl, held at B&W Headquarters, brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue. DISCUSSION 1. The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the oral cavity. The data on the desirability of one specific configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive. Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs. 2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize all flows that are not unidirectional. is probably an oversimplification. At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod), the data presented by Kelly St. Charles (B&W) and Martin Duke (Southampton) for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence of a time-varying unsteadiness in smoke column stability which results in breakup and nulti-dimensional dispersion. This mechanism appears distinctly different from the "Actron" flowfield, although both indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics. 3. I would suggest that B&W consider a refinement of the associated laboratory experiment designs to geherate discriminating data. one variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert COMCO 3601A Chapman Highway Innoxville, TN 37920 Phone: $15)577-5494 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037 substantial influences. While the oral cavity is indeed a closely coupled effect in reality, I suggest that B&W consider conducting experiments within a test chamber with walls and backplane positioned at significantly larger distances from the smoke column. This may help significantly in firm quantization of the influence of specific filter designs on the resultant flowfield. 4. If the results of these tests, conducted in larger dimension test chambers, confirms that instability of the smoke column, as induced by filter preconditioning, is a potentially viable mechanism for dispersal, theoretical analyses of the turbulent breakup of columnar jets reported in the aerospace literature may help in establishing an understanding of the physics involved in these processes. I am not well versed in this literature, but contacts do exist that might prove useful in establisning such an understanding. COMCO might serve as a useful vchicle for securing this expertise, without the need to divulge significant aspects of the proprietary nature of these designs. 5. Overall, the conference was highly informative on examination of the role that aerodynamics analyses might exert. A continued close correlation of theoretical aspects with laboratory experiments could prove highly useful in design refinement and optimization of specific filter configurations. 32 COMCO 3601A Chapman Highway o Knoxville, TN 37920 Phone: (615)577-5494 1 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037

One variable that has implicitly not been controlled?

nmcj0037

nmcj0037_p0, nmcj0037_p1

The influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry, influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry.

In 22.10.14 a Se, Wp MEMORANDUM To: Mr. R. Hugh Honeycutt From: A. J. Baker Subject: The Aerodynamics of Swirl Date: October 1, 1984 SUMMARY The conference on "smoke swirl, held at B&W Headquarters, brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue. DISCUSSION 1. The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the oral cavity. The data on the desirability of one specific configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive. Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs. 2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize all flows that are not unidirectional. is probably an oversimplification. At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod), the data presented by Kelly St. Charles (B&W) and Martin Duke (Southampton) for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence of a time-varying unsteadiness in smoke column stability which results in breakup and nulti-dimensional dispersion. This mechanism appears distinctly different from the "Actron" flowfield, although both indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics. 3. I would suggest that B&W consider a refinement of the associated laboratory experiment designs to geherate discriminating data. one variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert COMCO 3601A Chapman Highway Innoxville, TN 37920 Phone: $15)577-5494 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037 substantial influences. While the oral cavity is indeed a closely coupled effect in reality, I suggest that B&W consider conducting experiments within a test chamber with walls and backplane positioned at significantly larger distances from the smoke column. This may help significantly in firm quantization of the influence of specific filter designs on the resultant flowfield. 4. If the results of these tests, conducted in larger dimension test chambers, confirms that instability of the smoke column, as induced by filter preconditioning, is a potentially viable mechanism for dispersal, theoretical analyses of the turbulent breakup of columnar jets reported in the aerospace literature may help in establishing an understanding of the physics involved in these processes. I am not well versed in this literature, but contacts do exist that might prove useful in establisning such an understanding. COMCO might serve as a useful vchicle for securing this expertise, without the need to divulge significant aspects of the proprietary nature of these designs. 5. Overall, the conference was highly informative on examination of the role that aerodynamics analyses might exert. A continued close correlation of theoretical aspects with laboratory experiments could prove highly useful in design refinement and optimization of specific filter configurations. 32 COMCO 3601A Chapman Highway o Knoxville, TN 37920 Phone: (615)577-5494 1 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037

What is the full form of PUF?

qhxj0037

qhxj0037_p0, qhxj0037_p1

polyurethane foam, POLYURETHANE FOAM

PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A. INTER-OFFICE - ORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia 6500 C90-03100 To: R. Ferguson Date: May 29, 1990 From: F. Hsu IH Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990 During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air & Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary of presentations grouped by specific subjects. SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE) As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off- line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke analysis system is potentially possible. Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer (Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles, pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO2 . He concluded that supercritical CO2 was very effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids Source: :ttps://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C. cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species, (2): to identify the factors -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037

Which hetero-atoms does polar compounds contain?

qhxj0037

qhxj0037_p0, qhxj0037_p1

NITROGEN, SULFUR AND OXYGEN, nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen.

PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A. INTER-OFFICE - ORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia 6500 C90-03100 To: R. Ferguson Date: May 29, 1990 From: F. Hsu IH Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990 During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air & Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary of presentations grouped by specific subjects. SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE) As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off- line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke analysis system is potentially possible. Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer (Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles, pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO2 . He concluded that supercritical CO2 was very effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids Source: :ttps://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C. cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species, (2): to identify the factors -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037

What is the full form of POVC?

qhxj0037

qhxj0037_p0, qhxj0037_p1

POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS

PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A. INTER-OFFICE - ORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia 6500 C90-03100 To: R. Ferguson Date: May 29, 1990 From: F. Hsu IH Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990 During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air & Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary of presentations grouped by specific subjects. SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE) As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off- line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke analysis system is potentially possible. Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer (Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles, pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO2 . He concluded that supercritical CO2 was very effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids Source: :ttps://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C. cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species, (2): to identify the factors -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037

Who presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft?

qhxj0037

qhxj0037_p0, qhxj0037_p1

D. J. EATOUGH (BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY), D. J. EATOUGH, D. J. Eatough

PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A. INTER-OFFICE - ORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia 6500 C90-03100 To: R. Ferguson Date: May 29, 1990 From: F. Hsu IH Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990 During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air & Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary of presentations grouped by specific subjects. SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE) As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off- line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke analysis system is potentially possible. Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer (Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles, pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO2 . He concluded that supercritical CO2 was very effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids Source: :ttps://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C. cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species, (2): to identify the factors -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037

What is the slope mentioned in the first table?

hgbl0037

hgbl0037_p6, hgbl0037_p7, hgbl0037_p8, hgbl0037_p9

0.1088102E+01

WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.75% TUR. EXT/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 7 ;127-147 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 37. 24. 30. 30.3 6.5 25.0000 59. 50. 38. 49.0 10.5 50.0000 90. 102. 96. 96.0 6.0 75.0000 106. 131. 122. 119.7 12.7 100.0000 174. 134. 135. 147.7 22.8 125.0000 179. 178. 181. 179.3 1.5 250.0000 290.278.302. 290.0 12.0 1206 Reulms ter bloses SLOPE= 0.1206256E+01 WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WTIH 1% TURKISH EXT/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 8 ;148-168 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 36. 27. 33. 32.0 4.6 25.0000 60. 71. 81. 70.7 10.5 50.0000 119. 105. 105. 109.7 8.1 75.0000 147. 141. 121. 136.3 13.6 100.0000 199. 168. 164. 177.0 19.2 125.0000 214. 211. 204. 209.7 5.1 250.0000 298.296.310. 301.3 7.6 SLOPE= 0.1430209E+01 1430 calms tar ledoses 1R4F REFERENCE/5%S-9/98/05-.12-92 SET # 9 169-189 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 44. 40. 26. 36.7 9.5 25.0000 75. 79. 74. 76.0 2.6 50.0000 107. 146. 123. 125.3 19.6 75.0000 149. 180. 172. 167.0 16.1 100.0000 220. 179. 222. 207.0 24.3 125.0000 267.280.257. 268.0 11.5 250.0000 391.328.395. 371.3 37.6 SLOPE= 0.1783329E+01 1783 RW/Mg for besoses AA/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 10 ;190-195 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 34. 29. 26. 29.7 4.0 0.5000 515. 500. 517. + 511.0 8.7 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 CONTROL WINSTON LT WITH G725/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 11 i 196-216 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 134. 136. 154. 141.3 11.0 25.0000 169. 152. 139. 153.3 15.0 50.0000 174. 172. 219. 188.3 26.6 75.0000 179. 203. 194. 192.0 12.1 100.0000 266. 250. 219. 245.0 23.9 125.0000 294. 278. 252. 274.7 21.2 250.0000 324. 392.379. 365.0 36.1 SLOPE= .1050571E+01 1051 Rwlmg tar ledoses WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 12 ;217-237 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 133. 137. 135.0 2.8 25.0000 175. 149. 154. 159.3 13.8 50.0000 165. 180. 174. 173.0 7.5 75.0000 190. 216. 225. 210.3 18.2 100.0000 214. 213. 213.5 0.7 125.0000 279. 299. 289.0 14.1 250.0000 410. 373. 338. 373.7 36.0 I SLOPE= 0.9940322E+00 994 RWIMg tar 7dose WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 0.75% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 13 ;238-258 : DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS , MEAN S.D. 0.0000 138. 150. 142. 143.3 6.1 25.0000 152. 156. 187. 165.0 19.2 50.0000 185. 201. 183. 191.7 13.3 75.0000 188.188.196. 190.7 4.6 100.0000 220.222.283. 241.7 35.8 125.0000 240.269.280. 263.0 20.7 250.0000 374.387.370. 377.0 8.9 SLOPE= 0.9416425E+00 942 ew 1mg ter 7doges Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 1% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 14 ;259-279 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 150. 164. 174. 162.7 12.1 25.0000 157. 181. 186. 174.7 15.5 50.0000 181. 191. 191. 187.7 5.8 75.0000 224. 224. 244. 230.7 11.5 100.0000 256. 261. 252. 256.3 4.5 125.0000 297. 316. 299. 304.0 10.4 250.0000 382. 359.388. 376.3 15.3 SLOPE= 0.1088102E+01 1088 Ruslms the 6 dose CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 SHEET/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 15 i 280-300 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 145. 152. 149. 148.7 3.5 25.0000 174. 154. 160. 162.7 10.3 50.0000 187. 196. 202. 195.0 7.5 75.0000 202. 219. 215. 212.0 8.9 100.0000 205. 218. 241. 221.3 18.2 125.0000 267. 275. 276. 272.7 4.9 250.0000 306. 274. 312. 297.3 20.4 SLOPE= 0.9183201E+00 918 cllims for lodoses WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5tS-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 1 ;301-321 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 135. 127. 148. 136.7 10.6 25.0000 155. 155. 170. 160.0 8.7 50.0000 190. 190. 164. 181.3 15.0 75.0000 183. 202. 193. 192.7 9.5 100.0000 226. 263. 250. 246.3 18.8 125.0000 293.276.271. 280.0 11.5 250.0000 337. 399.380. 372.0 31.8 SLOPE= .1094010E+01 1094 swing for 6doses Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 WINSTÓN LI, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.75% TURK EXT/5%Ss-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 2 ;322-342 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 149.152.147. 149.3 2.5 25.0000 188.168.161. 172.3 14.0 50.0000 188.179.196. 187.7 8.5 75.0000 205. 191. 220. 205.3 14.5 100.0000 223.246.254. 241.0 16.1 125.0000 249.289.317. 285.0 34.2 250.0000 42.369.403. 371.3 30.6 SLOPE= 0.9322295E+00 932 sealms tar 7 doses WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 1% TURKISH EXT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 3 ;343-363 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 155. 156. 155. 155.3 0.6 25.0000 189.174.160. 174.3 14.5 50.0000 159.194.191. 181.3 19.4 75.0000 222.182.216. 206.7 21.6 100.0000 252.244.234. 243.3 9.0 125.0000 273.278.265. 272.0 6.6 250.0000 419.323.417. 386.3 54.9 SLOPE= 0.9463008E+00 946 2wing tor Toloses 1R4F REFERENCE/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 4 364-384 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 159.165.169. 164.3 5.0 25.0000 193.144.170. 169.0 24.5 50.0000 156.159.188. 167.7 17.7 75.0000 198.201.205. 202.3 3.8 100.0000 272.252.257. 260.3 10.4 125.0000 282.302.304. 296.0 12.2 250.0000 184.393.392. 389.7 4.9 SLOPE= 0.9834262E+00 983 Rehhs tar 7doge AA/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 5 ;385-390 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 131. 133. 146. 136.7 8.1 0.5000 606. 615. 680. + 633.7 40.4 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037

What is the date mentioned in the second table?

hgbl0037

hgbl0037_p6, hgbl0037_p7, hgbl0037_p8, hgbl0037_p9

05-12-92

WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.75% TUR. EXT/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 7 ;127-147 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 37. 24. 30. 30.3 6.5 25.0000 59. 50. 38. 49.0 10.5 50.0000 90. 102. 96. 96.0 6.0 75.0000 106. 131. 122. 119.7 12.7 100.0000 174. 134. 135. 147.7 22.8 125.0000 179. 178. 181. 179.3 1.5 250.0000 290.278.302. 290.0 12.0 1206 Reulms ter bloses SLOPE= 0.1206256E+01 WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WTIH 1% TURKISH EXT/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 8 ;148-168 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 36. 27. 33. 32.0 4.6 25.0000 60. 71. 81. 70.7 10.5 50.0000 119. 105. 105. 109.7 8.1 75.0000 147. 141. 121. 136.3 13.6 100.0000 199. 168. 164. 177.0 19.2 125.0000 214. 211. 204. 209.7 5.1 250.0000 298.296.310. 301.3 7.6 SLOPE= 0.1430209E+01 1430 calms tar ledoses 1R4F REFERENCE/5%S-9/98/05-.12-92 SET # 9 169-189 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 44. 40. 26. 36.7 9.5 25.0000 75. 79. 74. 76.0 2.6 50.0000 107. 146. 123. 125.3 19.6 75.0000 149. 180. 172. 167.0 16.1 100.0000 220. 179. 222. 207.0 24.3 125.0000 267.280.257. 268.0 11.5 250.0000 391.328.395. 371.3 37.6 SLOPE= 0.1783329E+01 1783 RW/Mg for besoses AA/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 10 ;190-195 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 34. 29. 26. 29.7 4.0 0.5000 515. 500. 517. + 511.0 8.7 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 CONTROL WINSTON LT WITH G725/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 11 i 196-216 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 134. 136. 154. 141.3 11.0 25.0000 169. 152. 139. 153.3 15.0 50.0000 174. 172. 219. 188.3 26.6 75.0000 179. 203. 194. 192.0 12.1 100.0000 266. 250. 219. 245.0 23.9 125.0000 294. 278. 252. 274.7 21.2 250.0000 324. 392.379. 365.0 36.1 SLOPE= .1050571E+01 1051 Rwlmg tar ledoses WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 12 ;217-237 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 133. 137. 135.0 2.8 25.0000 175. 149. 154. 159.3 13.8 50.0000 165. 180. 174. 173.0 7.5 75.0000 190. 216. 225. 210.3 18.2 100.0000 214. 213. 213.5 0.7 125.0000 279. 299. 289.0 14.1 250.0000 410. 373. 338. 373.7 36.0 I SLOPE= 0.9940322E+00 994 RWIMg tar 7dose WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 0.75% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 13 ;238-258 : DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS , MEAN S.D. 0.0000 138. 150. 142. 143.3 6.1 25.0000 152. 156. 187. 165.0 19.2 50.0000 185. 201. 183. 191.7 13.3 75.0000 188.188.196. 190.7 4.6 100.0000 220.222.283. 241.7 35.8 125.0000 240.269.280. 263.0 20.7 250.0000 374.387.370. 377.0 8.9 SLOPE= 0.9416425E+00 942 ew 1mg ter 7doges Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 1% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 14 ;259-279 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 150. 164. 174. 162.7 12.1 25.0000 157. 181. 186. 174.7 15.5 50.0000 181. 191. 191. 187.7 5.8 75.0000 224. 224. 244. 230.7 11.5 100.0000 256. 261. 252. 256.3 4.5 125.0000 297. 316. 299. 304.0 10.4 250.0000 382. 359.388. 376.3 15.3 SLOPE= 0.1088102E+01 1088 Ruslms the 6 dose CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 SHEET/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 15 i 280-300 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 145. 152. 149. 148.7 3.5 25.0000 174. 154. 160. 162.7 10.3 50.0000 187. 196. 202. 195.0 7.5 75.0000 202. 219. 215. 212.0 8.9 100.0000 205. 218. 241. 221.3 18.2 125.0000 267. 275. 276. 272.7 4.9 250.0000 306. 274. 312. 297.3 20.4 SLOPE= 0.9183201E+00 918 cllims for lodoses WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5tS-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 1 ;301-321 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 135. 127. 148. 136.7 10.6 25.0000 155. 155. 170. 160.0 8.7 50.0000 190. 190. 164. 181.3 15.0 75.0000 183. 202. 193. 192.7 9.5 100.0000 226. 263. 250. 246.3 18.8 125.0000 293.276.271. 280.0 11.5 250.0000 337. 399.380. 372.0 31.8 SLOPE= .1094010E+01 1094 swing for 6doses Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 WINSTÓN LI, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.75% TURK EXT/5%Ss-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 2 ;322-342 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 149.152.147. 149.3 2.5 25.0000 188.168.161. 172.3 14.0 50.0000 188.179.196. 187.7 8.5 75.0000 205. 191. 220. 205.3 14.5 100.0000 223.246.254. 241.0 16.1 125.0000 249.289.317. 285.0 34.2 250.0000 42.369.403. 371.3 30.6 SLOPE= 0.9322295E+00 932 sealms tar 7 doses WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 1% TURKISH EXT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 3 ;343-363 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 155. 156. 155. 155.3 0.6 25.0000 189.174.160. 174.3 14.5 50.0000 159.194.191. 181.3 19.4 75.0000 222.182.216. 206.7 21.6 100.0000 252.244.234. 243.3 9.0 125.0000 273.278.265. 272.0 6.6 250.0000 419.323.417. 386.3 54.9 SLOPE= 0.9463008E+00 946 2wing tor Toloses 1R4F REFERENCE/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 4 364-384 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 159.165.169. 164.3 5.0 25.0000 193.144.170. 169.0 24.5 50.0000 156.159.188. 167.7 17.7 75.0000 198.201.205. 202.3 3.8 100.0000 272.252.257. 260.3 10.4 125.0000 282.302.304. 296.0 12.2 250.0000 184.393.392. 389.7 4.9 SLOPE= 0.9834262E+00 983 Rehhs tar 7doge AA/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 5 ;385-390 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 131. 133. 146. 136.7 8.1 0.5000 606. 615. 680. + 633.7 40.4 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037

What is the S.D. mentioned in the DOSE-ug 0.0000 in the third table?

hgbl0037

hgbl0037_p6, hgbl0037_p7, hgbl0037_p8, hgbl0037_p9

10.6

WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.75% TUR. EXT/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 7 ;127-147 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 37. 24. 30. 30.3 6.5 25.0000 59. 50. 38. 49.0 10.5 50.0000 90. 102. 96. 96.0 6.0 75.0000 106. 131. 122. 119.7 12.7 100.0000 174. 134. 135. 147.7 22.8 125.0000 179. 178. 181. 179.3 1.5 250.0000 290.278.302. 290.0 12.0 1206 Reulms ter bloses SLOPE= 0.1206256E+01 WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WTIH 1% TURKISH EXT/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 8 ;148-168 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 36. 27. 33. 32.0 4.6 25.0000 60. 71. 81. 70.7 10.5 50.0000 119. 105. 105. 109.7 8.1 75.0000 147. 141. 121. 136.3 13.6 100.0000 199. 168. 164. 177.0 19.2 125.0000 214. 211. 204. 209.7 5.1 250.0000 298.296.310. 301.3 7.6 SLOPE= 0.1430209E+01 1430 calms tar ledoses 1R4F REFERENCE/5%S-9/98/05-.12-92 SET # 9 169-189 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 44. 40. 26. 36.7 9.5 25.0000 75. 79. 74. 76.0 2.6 50.0000 107. 146. 123. 125.3 19.6 75.0000 149. 180. 172. 167.0 16.1 100.0000 220. 179. 222. 207.0 24.3 125.0000 267.280.257. 268.0 11.5 250.0000 391.328.395. 371.3 37.6 SLOPE= 0.1783329E+01 1783 RW/Mg for besoses AA/5%S-9/98/05-12-92 SET # 10 ;190-195 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 34. 29. 26. 29.7 4.0 0.5000 515. 500. 517. + 511.0 8.7 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 CONTROL WINSTON LT WITH G725/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 11 i 196-216 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 134. 136. 154. 141.3 11.0 25.0000 169. 152. 139. 153.3 15.0 50.0000 174. 172. 219. 188.3 26.6 75.0000 179. 203. 194. 192.0 12.1 100.0000 266. 250. 219. 245.0 23.9 125.0000 294. 278. 252. 274.7 21.2 250.0000 324. 392.379. 365.0 36.1 SLOPE= .1050571E+01 1051 Rwlmg tar ledoses WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 12 ;217-237 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 133. 137. 135.0 2.8 25.0000 175. 149. 154. 159.3 13.8 50.0000 165. 180. 174. 173.0 7.5 75.0000 190. 216. 225. 210.3 18.2 100.0000 214. 213. 213.5 0.7 125.0000 279. 299. 289.0 14.1 250.0000 410. 373. 338. 373.7 36.0 I SLOPE= 0.9940322E+00 994 RWIMg tar 7dose WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 0.75% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 13 ;238-258 : DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS , MEAN S.D. 0.0000 138. 150. 142. 143.3 6.1 25.0000 152. 156. 187. 165.0 19.2 50.0000 185. 201. 183. 191.7 13.3 75.0000 188.188.196. 190.7 4.6 100.0000 220.222.283. 241.7 35.8 125.0000 240.269.280. 263.0 20.7 250.0000 374.387.370. 377.0 8.9 SLOPE= 0.9416425E+00 942 ew 1mg ter 7doges Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 1% TURKISH EXTRACT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 14 ;259-279 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 150. 164. 174. 162.7 12.1 25.0000 157. 181. 186. 174.7 15.5 50.0000 181. 191. 191. 187.7 5.8 75.0000 224. 224. 244. 230.7 11.5 100.0000 256. 261. 252. 256.3 4.5 125.0000 297. 316. 299. 304.0 10.4 250.0000 382. 359.388. 376.3 15.3 SLOPE= 0.1088102E+01 1088 Ruslms the 6 dose CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 SHEET/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 15 i 280-300 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 145. 152. 149. 148.7 3.5 25.0000 174. 154. 160. 162.7 10.3 50.0000 187. 196. 202. 195.0 7.5 75.0000 202. 219. 215. 212.0 8.9 100.0000 205. 218. 241. 221.3 18.2 125.0000 267. 275. 276. 272.7 4.9 250.0000 306. 274. 312. 297.3 20.4 SLOPE= 0.9183201E+00 918 cllims for lodoses WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5tS-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 1 ;301-321 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 135. 127. 148. 136.7 10.6 25.0000 155. 155. 170. 160.0 8.7 50.0000 190. 190. 164. 181.3 15.0 75.0000 183. 202. 193. 192.7 9.5 100.0000 226. 263. 250. 246.3 18.8 125.0000 293.276.271. 280.0 11.5 250.0000 337. 399.380. 372.0 31.8 SLOPE= .1094010E+01 1094 swing for 6doses Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037 WINSTÓN LI, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.75% TURK EXT/5%Ss-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 2 ;322-342 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 149.152.147. 149.3 2.5 25.0000 188.168.161. 172.3 14.0 50.0000 188.179.196. 187.7 8.5 75.0000 205. 191. 220. 205.3 14.5 100.0000 223.246.254. 241.0 16.1 125.0000 249.289.317. 285.0 34.2 250.0000 42.369.403. 371.3 30.6 SLOPE= 0.9322295E+00 932 sealms tar 7 doses WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 1% TURKISH EXT/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 3 ;343-363 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 155. 156. 155. 155.3 0.6 25.0000 189.174.160. 174.3 14.5 50.0000 159.194.191. 181.3 19.4 75.0000 222.182.216. 206.7 21.6 100.0000 252.244.234. 243.3 9.0 125.0000 273.278.265. 272.0 6.6 250.0000 419.323.417. 386.3 54.9 SLOPE= 0.9463008E+00 946 2wing tor Toloses 1R4F REFERENCE/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 4 364-384 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 159.165.169. 164.3 5.0 25.0000 193.144.170. 169.0 24.5 50.0000 156.159.188. 167.7 17.7 75.0000 198.201.205. 202.3 3.8 100.0000 272.252.257. 260.3 10.4 125.0000 282.302.304. 296.0 12.2 250.0000 184.393.392. 389.7 4.9 SLOPE= 0.9834262E+00 983 Rehhs tar 7doge AA/5%S-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 5 ;385-390 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0.0000 131. 133. 146. 136.7 8.1 0.5000 606. 615. 680. + 633.7 40.4 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgbl0037

Where were the two magnesium containing papers made at?

nhxj0037

nhxj0037_p0, nhxj0037_p1

University of Maine

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. CON. 1 INTER-OFFICE - CORRESPONDENCI Richmond, Virginia To: Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45- g/m² paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m² papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m², various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m², and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037

Which base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system?

nhxj0037

nhxj0037_p0, nhxj0037_p1

091, The 091 Base paper

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. CON. 1 INTER-OFFICE - CORRESPONDENCI Richmond, Virginia To: Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45- g/m² paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m² papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m², various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m², and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037

which cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p4

These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette, low smoke cigarette, low smoke

5 unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full circumference cigarette--a product of the future. When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed. VSSS Circumference These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique, novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something they were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner. Smoke Odor The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS, forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of which component?

nhxj0037

nhxj0037_p0, nhxj0037_p1

a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magesium ammonium carbonate, a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate, high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate

OF PHILIP MORRIS U.S. A. CON. 1 INTER-OFFICE - CORRESPONDENCI Richmond, Virginia To: Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45- g/m² paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m² papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m², various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m², and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037

How much percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p4

over fifty percent, Over Fifty percent

5 unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full circumference cigarette--a product of the future. When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed. VSSS Circumference These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique, novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something they were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner. Smoke Odor The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS, forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

who were bothered by cigarette odors

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p4

Nonsmokers, nonsmokers, Nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors

5 unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full circumference cigarette--a product of the future. When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed. VSSS Circumference These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique, novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something they were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner. Smoke Odor The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS, forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS. Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

What is the heading of first table?

rncj0037

rncj0037_p2, rncj0037_p3

SLIM CIGARETTES, Slim Cigarettes

RIP-6 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 4I/6 61/6 498058 61/6 51/6 498059 4I/6 6I/6 498060 5I/6 51/6 498061 5I/6 61/6 498062 61/6 6I/6 RIP-4 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 1I/SSE 31/1NI/2SE 498058 1I/SSE 11/1NI/4SE 498059 6SE 6NI 498060 6SE 2NI/4SE 498061 6SE 1NI/5SE 498062 6SE 4NI/2SE 584100575 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name R1P-6 R1P-4 More White Lts 120 6I/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 1NI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 4I/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code R1P-5CW/O - Filter) RlP - 6(W/Filter) P4049-99(5C) - 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A(7C) 1I/5SE 6SE 2.5% A1C13 on GPC - 3I/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037

What is RIP-6 value for KOOL KS?

rncj0037

rncj0037_p2, rncj0037_p3

6I/6

RIP-6 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 4I/6 61/6 498058 61/6 51/6 498059 4I/6 6I/6 498060 5I/6 51/6 498061 5I/6 61/6 498062 61/6 6I/6 RIP-4 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 1I/SSE 31/1NI/2SE 498058 1I/SSE 11/1NI/4SE 498059 6SE 6NI 498060 6SE 2NI/4SE 498061 6SE 1NI/5SE 498062 6SE 4NI/2SE 584100575 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name R1P-6 R1P-4 More White Lts 120 6I/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 1NI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 4I/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code R1P-5CW/O - Filter) RlP - 6(W/Filter) P4049-99(5C) - 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A(7C) 1I/5SE 6SE 2.5% A1C13 on GPC - 3I/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037

What is the heading of second table

rncj0037

rncj0037_p2, rncj0037_p3

K. C. Cigarettes

RIP-6 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 4I/6 61/6 498058 61/6 51/6 498059 4I/6 6I/6 498060 5I/6 51/6 498061 5I/6 61/6 498062 61/6 6I/6 RIP-4 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 1I/SSE 31/1NI/2SE 498058 1I/SSE 11/1NI/4SE 498059 6SE 6NI 498060 6SE 2NI/4SE 498061 6SE 1NI/5SE 498062 6SE 4NI/2SE 584100575 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name R1P-6 R1P-4 More White Lts 120 6I/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 1NI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 4I/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code R1P-5CW/O - Filter) RlP - 6(W/Filter) P4049-99(5C) - 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A(7C) 1I/5SE 6SE 2.5% A1C13 on GPC - 3I/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037

What is the cigarette code of RIP-6(W/O Filter) 21/4SE

rncj0037

rncj0037_p2, rncj0037_p3

P4049-99(5C)

RIP-6 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 4I/6 61/6 498058 61/6 51/6 498059 4I/6 6I/6 498060 5I/6 51/6 498061 5I/6 61/6 498062 61/6 6I/6 RIP-4 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 1I/SSE 31/1NI/2SE 498058 1I/SSE 11/1NI/4SE 498059 6SE 6NI 498060 6SE 2NI/4SE 498061 6SE 1NI/5SE 498062 6SE 4NI/2SE 584100575 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name R1P-6 R1P-4 More White Lts 120 6I/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 1NI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 4I/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code R1P-5CW/O - Filter) RlP - 6(W/Filter) P4049-99(5C) - 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A(7C) 1I/5SE 6SE 2.5% A1C13 on GPC - 3I/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037

What is the name of the corporation?

qncj0037

qncj0037_p0, qncj0037_p1

BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO corporation, brown & Williamson tobacco corporation

2wks today BSW BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT MEETING REPORT SUBJECT: Reduced Ignition Propensity/498 PRESENT: A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994 ISSUE DATE: January 25, 1994 CC: Attendees, I. F. Riehl The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items from the January 10th meeting. Lee Chao 1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In progress. 2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done. 3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6 testing - Done (see attached results). 4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial results attached) on R4P - 6 - 5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress. 6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress. 7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress (preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ? approval needed) Kelley St. Charles 1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta getting data ready to be sent. 584100570 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037 -2- Can't 2. Check with KC to see if they could put bands "long-ways" - In progress, 3. Check on "shrinking" paper (Cogbill and others) - In progress. 4. Check with KC on commercialibility of banded papers - Okay. Jimmy Wu 1. Write DC work request with KC banded papers - Waiting for Art Diesing approval of banded additives. Other Items Run GPC KS and KOOL KS on RIP-4 (LCC) KC is in the process of running "cross-hatch" papers. Next Meeting The next meeting will be Monday, February 7, at 9:00 a.m. in the International Conference Room. Live R. A. Gonterman RAG/smpp4f448.wp 584100571 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037

What is the subject?

qncj0037

qncj0037_p0, qncj0037_p1

Reduced Ignition Propensity/498, reduced ignition propensity/498

2wks today BSW BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT MEETING REPORT SUBJECT: Reduced Ignition Propensity/498 PRESENT: A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994 ISSUE DATE: January 25, 1994 CC: Attendees, I. F. Riehl The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items from the January 10th meeting. Lee Chao 1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In progress. 2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done. 3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6 testing - Done (see attached results). 4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial results attached) on R4P - 6 - 5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress. 6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress. 7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress (preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ? approval needed) Kelley St. Charles 1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta getting data ready to be sent. 584100570 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037 -2- Can't 2. Check with KC to see if they could put bands "long-ways" - In progress, 3. Check on "shrinking" paper (Cogbill and others) - In progress. 4. Check with KC on commercialibility of banded papers - Okay. Jimmy Wu 1. Write DC work request with KC banded papers - Waiting for Art Diesing approval of banded additives. Other Items Run GPC KS and KOOL KS on RIP-4 (LCC) KC is in the process of running "cross-hatch" papers. Next Meeting The next meeting will be Monday, February 7, at 9:00 a.m. in the International Conference Room. Live R. A. Gonterman RAG/smpp4f448.wp 584100571 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037

What is the meeting date?

qncj0037

qncj0037_p0, qncj0037_p1

January 24, 1994, January 24 , 1994

2wks today BSW BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT MEETING REPORT SUBJECT: Reduced Ignition Propensity/498 PRESENT: A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994 ISSUE DATE: January 25, 1994 CC: Attendees, I. F. Riehl The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items from the January 10th meeting. Lee Chao 1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In progress. 2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done. 3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6 testing - Done (see attached results). 4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial results attached) on R4P - 6 - 5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress. 6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress. 7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress (preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ? approval needed) Kelley St. Charles 1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta getting data ready to be sent. 584100570 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037 -2- Can't 2. Check with KC to see if they could put bands "long-ways" - In progress, 3. Check on "shrinking" paper (Cogbill and others) - In progress. 4. Check with KC on commercialibility of banded papers - Okay. Jimmy Wu 1. Write DC work request with KC banded papers - Waiting for Art Diesing approval of banded additives. Other Items Run GPC KS and KOOL KS on RIP-4 (LCC) KC is in the process of running "cross-hatch" papers. Next Meeting The next meeting will be Monday, February 7, at 9:00 a.m. in the International Conference Room. Live R. A. Gonterman RAG/smpp4f448.wp 584100571 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037

How many one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th?

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p1

forty

2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th. The participants were screened for the following requirements: - Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 - Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes - Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack - Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke, odor Packaging Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

According to the listed requirements , what must be the age group of female smokers?

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p1

between the ages of 18 and 55

2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th. The participants were screened for the following requirements: - Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 - Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes - Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack - Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke, odor Packaging Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

According to the requirements what is the minimum required consumption of a regular brand?

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p1

1/2 pack

2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th. The participants were screened for the following requirements: - Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 - Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes - Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack - Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke, odor Packaging Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

How many focus groups were held?

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p1

Two

2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th. The participants were screened for the following requirements: - Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 - Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes - Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack - Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke, odor Packaging Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

Which interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in groups?

fxxj0037

fxxj0037_p1

The one-on-one interviews, one-on-one interviews, The one-on-one

2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th. The participants were screened for the following requirements: - Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 - Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes - Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack - Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke, odor Packaging Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037

What is the Best Prototype mentioned?

lycj0037

lycj0037_p1, lycj0037_p2, lycj0037_p3, lycj0037_p4

327391

-2- The redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will need to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used for the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements necessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate analytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before usage. The reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these primary operations must come from the following lot numbers: MA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415) MA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710) Therefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos from these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the week of April 8, 1991. Once the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted tobacco, 1,500 lbs. of conditioned EBR and 500 lbs. of conditioned CPCL will be "caught off" These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by refrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack boxes to accomplish this. These primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991. Excess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at 5% or less. Excess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried burleys at 1% or less. Labels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A. Charge all expenses to 02-327. Ship all tobaccos to: B & W Tobacco Corporation Development Center, Dock 10F Lee & McCloskey Streets Louisville, Kentucky Attn: B. A. Bandy R&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products. If there are any questions, please advise. S.E Bobbitt T. E. B. MB. p3b14 Attachment 583232682 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO INQUIRY CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 - D STATUS: DEVELOPMENTAL DESCRIPTION: BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 SHORT DESCRIPTION: BST391 BLEND: BW-6071 THE BURLEY IS REDRIED OFF-LINE MOISTURE TARGETS: FINAL (IN CIGARETTE) 14.00 % FLUE CURED STRIPS IN BULKER 21.00 % BURLEY STRIPS IN STRIPS BULKER 21.00 % STRIP MOISTURE GAINS FROM MAKE-UP USING HOTANTIS: FLUE CURED STACK 2.00 % BURLEY STACK 2.00 % RECONSTITUTED TOBACCO ADD POINT (S) : TO FLUE CURED/ORIENTAL BEFORE CASING TO REDRIED BURLEY BEFORE TOP DRESSING : STRIPS APPLIED TO : APPL. RATE YIELD : APPL. : STEAM FC CASINGS FLUE ORNT BRLY RECON (LBS/M LBS) M.C.% : TEMP. : TEMP. C-727 X X 114.38 19.0 120 : 0 HOTANTIS X 28.21 21.0 120 135 1 TOP DRESSINGS C-728 X X 93.10 19.0 120 0 HOTANTIS X X 27.67 21.0 120 - 135 FLUE CURED -- BURLEY -- -- ORIENTAL -- -- RECONSTITUTED -- GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % 1 C2F 9.4 977 BEST 25.4 73 AOB3 12.8 65 EBRC 13.9 3 L2F 13.5 70 CPCL 10.0 5 T2F 6.0 7 L2FR 9.0 TOTAL 37.9 TOTAL 25.4 TOTAL 12.8 TOTAL 23.9 583232683 Source: :https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO CALCULATIONS CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 FINAL YIELD 12,012 LBS @ 14.0 % M.C. STRIPS BATCH SIZE: 10,000 LBS @ 15.0 % M.C. CUT TOBACCO: : MT-768 D BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3,681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % STRIPS BATCH 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % CASINGS: C-727 319.6001 694.3212 APPL LBS C-728 139.1876 365.9109 APPL LBS CASED STRIPS 8,958.7877 11,340.2 @ 21.0 % ADD-ONS: ** NO ADD-ONS OR FLAVOR ARE TO BE ADDED TO THIS TEST BATCH ** FINAL YIELD (CASED STRIPS + ADD-ONS) 8,958.8 10,417.2 @ 14.0 % 583232684 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO : MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3.681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F 913.1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F 1,311.4 1,147.5 1,350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 T2F T2F 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR 291.1 254.7 299.7 874.3 765.0 900.0 65 EBRC EBR 1,350.3 1,181.5 1,390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL 971.4 850.0 1,000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 UAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 YAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 977 BEST MT-778 1,996.4 1,746.8 ) + CASING (S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037

What is the BLEND mentioned?

lycj0037

lycj0037_p1, lycj0037_p2, lycj0037_p3, lycj0037_p4

BW-6071, bw-6071

-2- The redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will need to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used for the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements necessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate analytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before usage. The reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these primary operations must come from the following lot numbers: MA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415) MA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710) Therefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos from these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the week of April 8, 1991. Once the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted tobacco, 1,500 lbs. of conditioned EBR and 500 lbs. of conditioned CPCL will be "caught off" These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by refrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack boxes to accomplish this. These primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991. Excess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at 5% or less. Excess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried burleys at 1% or less. Labels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A. Charge all expenses to 02-327. Ship all tobaccos to: B & W Tobacco Corporation Development Center, Dock 10F Lee & McCloskey Streets Louisville, Kentucky Attn: B. A. Bandy R&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products. If there are any questions, please advise. S.E Bobbitt T. E. B. MB. p3b14 Attachment 583232682 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO INQUIRY CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 - D STATUS: DEVELOPMENTAL DESCRIPTION: BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 SHORT DESCRIPTION: BST391 BLEND: BW-6071 THE BURLEY IS REDRIED OFF-LINE MOISTURE TARGETS: FINAL (IN CIGARETTE) 14.00 % FLUE CURED STRIPS IN BULKER 21.00 % BURLEY STRIPS IN STRIPS BULKER 21.00 % STRIP MOISTURE GAINS FROM MAKE-UP USING HOTANTIS: FLUE CURED STACK 2.00 % BURLEY STACK 2.00 % RECONSTITUTED TOBACCO ADD POINT (S) : TO FLUE CURED/ORIENTAL BEFORE CASING TO REDRIED BURLEY BEFORE TOP DRESSING : STRIPS APPLIED TO : APPL. RATE YIELD : APPL. : STEAM FC CASINGS FLUE ORNT BRLY RECON (LBS/M LBS) M.C.% : TEMP. : TEMP. C-727 X X 114.38 19.0 120 : 0 HOTANTIS X 28.21 21.0 120 135 1 TOP DRESSINGS C-728 X X 93.10 19.0 120 0 HOTANTIS X X 27.67 21.0 120 - 135 FLUE CURED -- BURLEY -- -- ORIENTAL -- -- RECONSTITUTED -- GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % 1 C2F 9.4 977 BEST 25.4 73 AOB3 12.8 65 EBRC 13.9 3 L2F 13.5 70 CPCL 10.0 5 T2F 6.0 7 L2FR 9.0 TOTAL 37.9 TOTAL 25.4 TOTAL 12.8 TOTAL 23.9 583232683 Source: :https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO CALCULATIONS CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 FINAL YIELD 12,012 LBS @ 14.0 % M.C. STRIPS BATCH SIZE: 10,000 LBS @ 15.0 % M.C. CUT TOBACCO: : MT-768 D BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3,681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % STRIPS BATCH 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % CASINGS: C-727 319.6001 694.3212 APPL LBS C-728 139.1876 365.9109 APPL LBS CASED STRIPS 8,958.7877 11,340.2 @ 21.0 % ADD-ONS: ** NO ADD-ONS OR FLAVOR ARE TO BE ADDED TO THIS TEST BATCH ** FINAL YIELD (CASED STRIPS + ADD-ONS) 8,958.8 10,417.2 @ 14.0 % 583232684 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO : MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3.681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F 913.1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F 1,311.4 1,147.5 1,350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 T2F T2F 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR 291.1 254.7 299.7 874.3 765.0 900.0 65 EBRC EBR 1,350.3 1,181.5 1,390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL 971.4 850.0 1,000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 UAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 YAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 977 BEST MT-778 1,996.4 1,746.8 ) + CASING (S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037

What is the LBS AT TARGET of TOTAL STRIPS?

lycj0037

lycj0037_p1, lycj0037_p2, lycj0037_p3, lycj0037_p4

10,000.0 @ 15.0 %

-2- The redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will need to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used for the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements necessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate analytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before usage. The reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these primary operations must come from the following lot numbers: MA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415) MA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710) Therefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos from these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the week of April 8, 1991. Once the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted tobacco, 1,500 lbs. of conditioned EBR and 500 lbs. of conditioned CPCL will be "caught off" These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by refrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack boxes to accomplish this. These primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991. Excess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at 5% or less. Excess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried burleys at 1% or less. Labels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A. Charge all expenses to 02-327. Ship all tobaccos to: B & W Tobacco Corporation Development Center, Dock 10F Lee & McCloskey Streets Louisville, Kentucky Attn: B. A. Bandy R&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products. If there are any questions, please advise. S.E Bobbitt T. E. B. MB. p3b14 Attachment 583232682 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO INQUIRY CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 - D STATUS: DEVELOPMENTAL DESCRIPTION: BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 SHORT DESCRIPTION: BST391 BLEND: BW-6071 THE BURLEY IS REDRIED OFF-LINE MOISTURE TARGETS: FINAL (IN CIGARETTE) 14.00 % FLUE CURED STRIPS IN BULKER 21.00 % BURLEY STRIPS IN STRIPS BULKER 21.00 % STRIP MOISTURE GAINS FROM MAKE-UP USING HOTANTIS: FLUE CURED STACK 2.00 % BURLEY STACK 2.00 % RECONSTITUTED TOBACCO ADD POINT (S) : TO FLUE CURED/ORIENTAL BEFORE CASING TO REDRIED BURLEY BEFORE TOP DRESSING : STRIPS APPLIED TO : APPL. RATE YIELD : APPL. : STEAM FC CASINGS FLUE ORNT BRLY RECON (LBS/M LBS) M.C.% : TEMP. : TEMP. C-727 X X 114.38 19.0 120 : 0 HOTANTIS X 28.21 21.0 120 135 1 TOP DRESSINGS C-728 X X 93.10 19.0 120 0 HOTANTIS X X 27.67 21.0 120 - 135 FLUE CURED -- BURLEY -- -- ORIENTAL -- -- RECONSTITUTED -- GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % 1 C2F 9.4 977 BEST 25.4 73 AOB3 12.8 65 EBRC 13.9 3 L2F 13.5 70 CPCL 10.0 5 T2F 6.0 7 L2FR 9.0 TOTAL 37.9 TOTAL 25.4 TOTAL 12.8 TOTAL 23.9 583232683 Source: :https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO CALCULATIONS CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 FINAL YIELD 12,012 LBS @ 14.0 % M.C. STRIPS BATCH SIZE: 10,000 LBS @ 15.0 % M.C. CUT TOBACCO: : MT-768 D BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3,681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % STRIPS BATCH 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % CASINGS: C-727 319.6001 694.3212 APPL LBS C-728 139.1876 365.9109 APPL LBS CASED STRIPS 8,958.7877 11,340.2 @ 21.0 % ADD-ONS: ** NO ADD-ONS OR FLAVOR ARE TO BE ADDED TO THIS TEST BATCH ** FINAL YIELD (CASED STRIPS + ADD-ONS) 8,958.8 10,417.2 @ 14.0 % 583232684 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO : MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3.681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F 913.1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F 1,311.4 1,147.5 1,350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 T2F T2F 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR 291.1 254.7 299.7 874.3 765.0 900.0 65 EBRC EBR 1,350.3 1,181.5 1,390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL 971.4 850.0 1,000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 UAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 YAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 977 BEST MT-778 1,996.4 1,746.8 ) + CASING (S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037

What is the SOLID LBS of T2F GRADE?

lycj0037

lycj0037_p1, lycj0037_p2, lycj0037_p3, lycj0037_p4

510.0, 510

-2- The redried burley (MT-778) in this blend will be staged; therefore, it will need to be run to the redried pack out bulker. It will be subsequently used for the rest of the BEST primaries. Please make the appropriate arrangements necessary to accomplish this. Quality should perform the appropriate analytical tests on this operation. The tobacco will be approved before usage. The reconstituted tobacco portions (EBR & CPCL) that will be used for these primary operations must come from the following lot numbers: MA 0402 (EBR # Range 00835200 - 00836415) MA 0625 (CPCL # Range 00852595 - 00852710) Therefore, please make the necessary arrangements required to pull tobaccos from these specified lot numbers for regular production usage starting the week of April 8, 1991. Once the grade bins have been filled with the appropriate reconstituted tobacco, 1,500 lbs. of conditioned EBR and 500 lbs. of conditioned CPCL will be "caught off" These tobaccos will be shipped to R&D Development Center by refrigerated truck on April 10, 1991. Please supply the appropriate big pack boxes to accomplish this. These primary operations will be run starting the week of April 8, 1991. Excess MT-768 D tobacco may be blended into any domestic non-menthol blend at 5% or less. Excess MT-778 tobacco may be blended into Richland and/or Amelia redried burleys at 1% or less. Labels that will be used to identify these tobaccos can be obtained from Wayne Sanders, Macon Q.A. Charge all expenses to 02-327. Ship all tobaccos to: B & W Tobacco Corporation Development Center, Dock 10F Lee & McCloskey Streets Louisville, Kentucky Attn: B. A. Bandy R&D assistance will be provided in the manufacture of these tobacco products. If there are any questions, please advise. S.E Bobbitt T. E. B. MB. p3b14 Attachment 583232682 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO INQUIRY CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 - D STATUS: DEVELOPMENTAL DESCRIPTION: BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 SHORT DESCRIPTION: BST391 BLEND: BW-6071 THE BURLEY IS REDRIED OFF-LINE MOISTURE TARGETS: FINAL (IN CIGARETTE) 14.00 % FLUE CURED STRIPS IN BULKER 21.00 % BURLEY STRIPS IN STRIPS BULKER 21.00 % STRIP MOISTURE GAINS FROM MAKE-UP USING HOTANTIS: FLUE CURED STACK 2.00 % BURLEY STACK 2.00 % RECONSTITUTED TOBACCO ADD POINT (S) : TO FLUE CURED/ORIENTAL BEFORE CASING TO REDRIED BURLEY BEFORE TOP DRESSING : STRIPS APPLIED TO : APPL. RATE YIELD : APPL. : STEAM FC CASINGS FLUE ORNT BRLY RECON (LBS/M LBS) M.C.% : TEMP. : TEMP. C-727 X X 114.38 19.0 120 : 0 HOTANTIS X 28.21 21.0 120 135 1 TOP DRESSINGS C-728 X X 93.10 19.0 120 0 HOTANTIS X X 27.67 21.0 120 - 135 FLUE CURED -- BURLEY -- -- ORIENTAL -- -- RECONSTITUTED -- GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % GRADE BIN % 1 C2F 9.4 977 BEST 25.4 73 AOB3 12.8 65 EBRC 13.9 3 L2F 13.5 70 CPCL 10.0 5 T2F 6.0 7 L2FR 9.0 TOTAL 37.9 TOTAL 25.4 TOTAL 12.8 TOTAL 23.9 583232683 Source: :https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO CALCULATIONS CUT TOBACCO: MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 FINAL YIELD 12,012 LBS @ 14.0 % M.C. STRIPS BATCH SIZE: 10,000 LBS @ 15.0 % M.C. CUT TOBACCO: : MT-768 D BEST PROTOTYPE, 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3,681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % STRIPS BATCH 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % CASINGS: C-727 319.6001 694.3212 APPL LBS C-728 139.1876 365.9109 APPL LBS CASED STRIPS 8,958.7877 11,340.2 @ 21.0 % ADD-ONS: ** NO ADD-ONS OR FLAVOR ARE TO BE ADDED TO THIS TEST BATCH ** FINAL YIELD (CASED STRIPS + ADD-ONS) 8,958.8 10,417.2 @ 14.0 % 583232684 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037 CUT TOBACCO : MT-768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS: FLUE CURED 3.681.7 3,221.5 3,790.0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY 1,996.3 ( 1,746.8 ) + CASING(S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED 2,321.7 2,031.5 2,390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS 9,243.1 8,500.0 10,000.0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F 913.1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F 1,311.4 1,147.5 1,350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 T2F T2F 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR 291.1 254.7 299.7 874.3 765.0 900.0 65 EBRC EBR 1,350.3 1,181.5 1,390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL 971.4 850.0 1,000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 UAB 207.6 181.7 213.8 YAB 414.1 362.3 426.2 1,243.4 1,088.0 1,280.0 977 BEST MT-778 1,996.4 1,746.8 ) + CASING (S) 2,159.0 2,540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037

What is the title of the letter?

mpcl0037

mpcl0037_p0

interoffice memorandum, INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpcl0037

To whom is this letter addressed?

mpcl0037

mpcl0037_p0

mr. roger jennings

R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpcl0037

What is the subject of the letter?

mpcl0037

mpcl0037_p0

effect of chemical stimulation on the perception of draw, Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw

R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpcl0037

What is the PROPOSAL NO.?

mpcl0037

mpcl0037_p0

R9044, r9044

R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpcl0037

When did the Human Research Committee meet to consider the proposal?

mpcl0037

mpcl0037_p0

November 27, 1990

R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpcl0037

For what does the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for?

xhxj0037

xhxj0037_p1, xhxj0037_p2

cork-on-white tipping, Cork-on-white tipping

loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m², the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for cork-on-white tipping. A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic tippings Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2. Flare-up rates of 4% and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard inks; 2% flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter. The 8% flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 4% flare-up rate was for tipping printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8 g/m²) giving the higher flare-up rate. To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were made to Marlboro LS- specifications No flare-ups were obtained at the filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, the standard ink tipping had 5% flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 1% flare-up. Conclusions and Recommendations From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction; (2) low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into the filter; (3) burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related to high ink weight on the tipping. We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be maintained below 3.5 g/m². It.a. Single CC: S. Cline J. Griffin D. Sealey G. Carter B. Hendricks T. Sanders J. Easley J. Myracle E. Weston P. Gauvin B. Peace Central Files -2- Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037 TABLE 1: BRISTOL TIPPING PAPERS PM Code 12-234A 11-215A 13-692A Brand Bristol Lts 100 Bristol 100 FF Bristol 100 FF Basesheet Ec. 30436 GSR-236M2 GSR-236M2 Ink Type Standard Standard Low Silicate Ink Weight, s/m² 4.3¹ 4.5' 4.5 Dibutyl Phthalate, & 0.58 0.59 0.25 x-ray Fluorescence of Printed Side: & Calcium 8.5 7.8 10.3 % Titanium 8.0 9.4 9.7 % Iron 2.2 2.0 1.8 & Magnesium 0.8 0.7 1.1 % Aluminum 1.4 1.4 <0.1 8 Silicon 3.1 3.1 0.7 Filter Flare-up, % 14² 12² 0 - ink weight expressed as grams of ink per total area of tipping paper, including white skirt 2 all flare-ups occurred in the filter section, none at the tobacco rod/filter junction Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037