Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_train_eval

like 2

(I was pretty tired anyway of all the back and forth arguing so I would have left anyway)

You're an ugly man aren't you? Were I bullied hence such a crappy job. Probably. Given the way u look now I wouldn't expect love soonest. Regards Hancock

Are you sure you can't edit User_talk:David_Tombe? It looks to me like it's not protected anymore. Don't underestimate the amount of research admins do before deciding on an unblock request. You can also assume that a lot of them also read the AN/I discussions concerning you when they took place, even if they did not participate. I think your best strategy will be to lay low for a while, then make another unblock request, pledging to follow all Wikipedia policies, including those concerning block evasion and sock-puppets, and to assume good faith concerning your fellow Wikipedians from now on.

Thanks, DW. (Is DW right?). I like the preface. I'm also happy you consider the OT reasonably normative up to the fall of the second temple, as I thought it was but coundn't really back it up. I'm happy to get rid of Lot. He's only there because the previous version of the article made heavy reference to him, and I didn't want to excise absolutely everything the previous author had written. I'm not really sure what to replace him with though; I've covered what I think are the important differences already (arranged marriage, legal position, submission to husband and father). Story of Jacob is a possibility, but again I'm not sure how normal his situation would be. 13:22, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

AGAINST I am against this proposal because you touch yourself at night!

, salt-cured meat, curing (food preservation), smoking (cooking technique) - probably others. Perhaps we don't need any more general articles

Oh dear, I was expecting 10 seconds.

Thank You Hey Nishkid I really appreciate the unblock. Once again I apologize for any vandalism I caused on user pages and I have read Wikipedia's user policy. Thank You!!!

By the way, I didn't call you a pompous ass, I said I WOULD call you a pompous ass. Apparently my initial assessment of your reading comprehension wasn't far off.

You DumbASz Liberals == Think it's encyclopedic-worthy to DEFEND Warren with findings of Warren-selected focus group of TWELVE F-CKING PEOPLE??? I can barely type this I'm laughing my ASz off so much at how BLINDED you are to your own biases and what a LAUGHINGSTOCK you've made of Wiki. A good idea whose time has been DESTROYED by you AARP-aged anal retentives that think you found your Bunker Hill here at Wikipedia! LOL!! ==

May 2012 (UTC) Your word isn't enough. You could be a convicted felon, a child rapist, a blind muslim cleric you are hiding your identity, and so nothing you claim can be proven. I AM who I say I am, and that is not in dispute. Meanwhile, the click of editors who play a god on this site have blocked me from editing content apparently, they (and you) cannot stand to be challenged with fact and instead prefer to hide behind rules and guidelines that have, justifiably, made Wikipedia a laughingstock in the world of academia and serious research. This was proven to me in a way that I will never forget, and will never let the world forget. 02:13, 24

You think you're smart, don't you? Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Nick, please ignore abuser:Drmies. He has a tendency to pick on new users such as yourself when he as an admin should be acting as a grown-up and a role-model. Drmies should not be badgering opposers of an RFA candidate whom he had nommed and he knows that. However, you must be resistant because he and his supporters will try to get you blocked. Drmies please always assume good faith on a new user. Regards.

" And afterwards I read this: []. User:Carlossuarez46 is calles Carlos by ? Are you friends then? Thank you, Carlos. ThuranX and Yes, thank you, Carlos. In the end talk drops by to thank everyone. Nice community. How knowing he's Carlos?. Next question: where do I read be not obnoxious, unapologetic?, when I'm not wrong and only argumenting unblocking? Also, it is incorrect that I should read these frienslinesees (among other persons, excluding me), without knowing about. If all of you want to force me into excuses or someting without reading - please leve this site forever. Your behaviour is like a bunch of liars. Mind the word bunch. - "

I'm happy to take a break from I/P, if it is so upsetting for you. It's not what I usually edit on anyway.~

"""I even thought I detected some uulating, thought I can't be entirely sure about that"" Alas, another day, another keyboard. Shocking dear girl/boy; quiet shocking -) "

TOJO'S BEEN HERE ') MONKEY MONKEY MONKEY MONKEY MONKEY MONKEY

Of course it's a blockable offense. But it would be very difficult to prove, because even if a checkuser were to check my account, it would come up clean (with the exception of some stupid vandalism from months ago when I just edited from in IP). And even if I were to get blocked for admitting it on my userpage, it wouldn't solve the underlying problem. At best, it would prevent me from making the few good contributions that I do from this username. On an unrelated note, as you well know, I keep a relatively close eye on CP. I wonder why you are so down on public schools when editing on CP. You obviously love your public school, and you'd have to be incredibly naive to think that it's the only good public school in America. You know as well as I do that there are some fantastic public schools and just as many lousy ones. If you feel so strongly about the issue, as I think you do, you shouldn't put on an act just to appease Andy. Let's face it. One day you're going to slip up at CP and get blocked. I've been watching CP for long enough to know that it happens to EVERYONE who's not an admin. Maybe you should cut your losses now and contribute more to a project that has succeeded and will continue to succeed. Despite clashing heads in the past, I do believe that you are a good person and have the best interest of Wikipedia in mind. I'd hate to see your time and effort wasted on the liberal hate site Conservapedia.

Talkback causa sui (talk)

RFA opened for Administrative Abuse Notified.

| This was me and I haven't edited wikipedia in years. Right to disapear

" ""This is the stuff that leads to severe admin burnout"" that's extremely sophistical reasoning. I think you're aware of the relevant Wikipedia policies, but just have no respect for them. "

" It gets worse. A user(who has a long history of poor quality edits and a case of ""musical impairment"") completely blew away the old article... and re-did it using a single source... WAY too many times. And the source is shades WP:RS pretty bad as well. Not sure what direction to go with this one. The editor is not a vandal. But he is a very poor editor none-the-same. He has attempted to create fairy-tale genre article in the past. Or, in some cases, re-created articles that had been voted to go the re-direct route because they held no water. A team needs to be drafted to try and salvage a sild purse from a sows ear. "

:Template:Picasso works As posted on User talk:Cburnett: This was a very useful template, but is now redundant as the info is in Template:Pablo Picasso. If you, as original author, agree, I will delete it, as there seems no further use to be made of it. I will also ask

" I believe that free speech and lack of respect for privacy are different issues completely, and one cannot be used to lay into the other. As far as I am aware, the general consensus across many sites is that if you plaster your personal information all over the internet then you have little recourse when it is plastered somewhere you do not like. It is then logical that whoever holds the domain would choose not to release that information as a common sense measure. I think that the idea that ED simply wishes to ""publish all trackable personal data of victims to defame them"" is a misunderstanding at best and a blatant lie at worst, and the point it (poorly) attempts to make is not worthy of mention in the article. "

Thanks; yeah, I saw that, but I just wasn't interested in pressing the point with the other editor. Maybe you could bring it to his/her attention. Thanks, though. (talk)

Day Vs. Night Like Sun Vs. the Stars... I am the Chariot That Burns in the Sky Love Me or Fear Me For I am Apollo... Strengths are Many Weaknesses are not as Plentiful For I will Strike you Down Like the Serpent Sent By Hera's Command... Although Aphrodite has not given me The Charms of Love I am the Ruler of the Sun I can give Light And I can take it Away...

Did you see the references? Even newspapers refer to him by those nicks. So why not? Come on. This is not a matter of partisanism.

Why was my Thrust1 edit reverted? I removed Category:Thrust project as it didn't exist, and moved the article from Category:Jet land speed record cars to Category:Jet cars, as Thrust1 was not itself a land speed record car (despite being constructed as part of the Thrust project to break the land speed record). Instead it was a low-speed test vehicle built to allow the team to gain experience in driving a jet-propelled vehicle.

" ""choosing to trust a partner who is physically at risk"" Back in February 2006, I believe you added the following item in the Human sexual behavior:Safety and ancillary issues section: ""choosing to trust a partner who is physically at risk."" I started a topic on the talk page to help me understand what we mean by that, perhaps leading to a clarification. If you have a chance to contribute there and enlighten me I'd much appreciate it. Thanks, "

" The word ""novels"" tells the reader they are fiction. It is perfectly possible for a novel to spark interest in a factual topic. "

Se WP:RS for more details. Thank you for your OR - could you provide RS which claim the same. WP does not deal with affilation or CV. As far as I can understood - you are not familar with European and Ukrainian scientifical structure and history - so you can use WP (rather then Google) to improve your knowlage. Also you can find about Kulchitsky - Kulchytsky is deputy director of the Institute of History at the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kyiv. His degrees include a doctorate in history from Odessa University. He has written more than 40 books and hundreds of articles. (as compared to 25 Magoci publication 99% of which about Rusins) So - you again stonewalling regarding above mentioned issue

SineB I didnt do anything, i just made the page better!!!!!! Dolphins will rule, and im Makai200150 by the way..

Hey you!!!!, do not show your solidarity with Kober by removing my comments. Did you see any POV in the last version when you reverted the article by fake accusations? First of all, I made small grammar corrections and nothing else. YOu are not Kober's watchdog, OK. ANd second, as a witness of all the events described in the article about Gamsakhurdia I have more rights to make corrections here, than you, a historian whose the only knowledge about Georgia and Armenian come from the books you read in your Canada.Behave yourself.

" Thanks. A technical issue caused some undoing of another editor's edits, so had to go back and undo them. The post itself is from Abtract whose edits were some of the ones accidentally reverted. Collectonian (talk · contribs) "

" ITN: 2010 Thai political protests On 23 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Thai political protests, which you substantially updated and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. '''''' "

" Speedy deletion of Sundeep khadka A tag has been placed on Sundeep khadka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. S93 "

" ""The the""? You might stop stuttering if you up the voltage on your shock treatments. "

" He is a washout. Do you have any facts to prove that he is not a washout? Fine, in AR 635-200, he'll be declared ""unsuitable"". But he's still a washout. It's pretty obvious you're fighting hard to defend this guy from the ""VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY"" that you are claiming. There is no vast right wing conspiracy. There is this jackass that has lied to the American People and slandered all those in the uniform for his own gain. "

"Because that's their name. ""ramones"" without a ""the"" is only relevant to album covers. "

His trade marks are oblivion and chakram.

" Honestly, I wouldnt have posted the article in the first place if I had known it had been posted & debated fairly before. As you can see I am a new user. If Fiddle had pointed this out in the first place instead of simply insulting my work, then we wouldnt even have to be having this discussion. Certainly you can agree that my actions were not vandalism. We can disagree on content, but posting what I thought was a relevant article could not be considered vandalism by even the broadest definition. That said, knowing (ex-post) that this article has been posted & debated previously, I see no need to re-post it. If we all treat each other fairly instead of assuming harmful intentions, the community as a whole will certainly benefit. I also think that Fiddle could benefit from some feedback on how to work with new users instead of immediately addressing their work as ""rubbish."""

I don't need to be watched. Treasury tags is hounding me.

Men's Right Activists: Fighting Feminazis by acting EXACTLY THE FRICKING SAME =) Wahh wahh I'm oppressed I know u r but what am I wahh wahh... sorry guys but I don't get how you are supposed to prove your superiority to a group by turning yourself into a caricature of it

Your revert of my description was POV. If you are suppporting the people killing innocent Iraquis then you are a terrorist sypathsizer. Sheehans is not above criticism in her description. What in the world are you talking about? If you continue to vandalize this article, I will take action against you.

" Exactly, Kelly knew what color her eyes were when she made the song ""Behind These Hazel Eyes"". Comparing the pictures of Kelly and Belle, they do seem to share the same eye color just slightly different shades of it - Belle's eyes are little lighter. Someone made a video called ""Behind Belle's Hazel Eyes"", the person who made this video knew what color Belle's eyes were and decided to include Belle's name in the title. And if you read the comments, the people fully agree her eyes are hazel with comments like ""green or hazel? they look more hazel than brown or green . yup belles eyes are deffinetely hazel problem solved"". I like the ""problem solved"" part. With Minotaurgirl's bias against the idea of Belle having hazel eyes, I think there will always be a problem with people like her involved. TV Tropes has already suffered an edit war because of her, so much so they forbade users from writting what Belle's eye color is. Notice how Belle's name is missing from the Eye Color tropes colony, while the rest of Disney Princesses have their eye color mentioned. Belle's name was there under the category of Hazel Eyes until Minotaurgirl came along and ruined it all. Same thing almost happened to Disney Wiki. This is Minotaurgirl's account, as you can see she got blocked with an expiry time of infinite, the reason; inserting false information, the false information being writting down Belle's eyes as brown.] And now here's Minotaurgirl on the Wikipedia. Is there any repsite from her? I noticed she has a Live Journal account. See what she has written. The lack of links speaks for itself. She thinks she actually proved Belle's eyes are brown, depsite the fact what she has presented as evidence is either a minority or a plain old lie, like the screenshots she send me. By magnifying the images, you can see her eyes are hazel-colored and not the same color as her hair at all. Notice how she's afriad to use close-ups of Belle's eye cuz she knows they'll appear hazel if she did so, thus disprov

ing her. On her blog, she didn't mention that she was blocked on Disney Wiki, and said the only reason Disney Wiki kept Belle's eyes color as hazel was to shut up people who keep writting her eyes as hazel, when in reality the one who got shut up was Minotaurgirl as she got blocked while the others didn't. She wrote ""Bleh. Kids these days. This one needs a hobby. I'm tired of wasting time trying to undo this snot's damage, and I'm fairly sure the mods of these sites are too. Would it be possible to just...block this person off the internet entirely until they learn some manners?"" Yup, she calls people who use logic and legitimate evidence to prove their point snots and hobby-less kids if the evidence goes against what Minotaurgirl said/believes. If anyone deserves to be blocked, it's Minotaurgirl. If it wasn't for her bias, sites like like TV Tropes, Disney Wiki and the Wikipedia wouldn't have suffered an edit war about Belle's eye color. The fact that there was never an edit about Belle's eye color until Minotaurgirl came along, says a lot. Ever since she got blocked from Disney Wiki almost an year ago, no edit war about Belle's eye color happened there either. It's like Minotaurgirl is the only person on the entire internet who refuses to accept Belle's eyes as hazel and is willing to go to every page and change her eye color to brown, just cuz she likes to think so, not because the world thinks so or any legit evidence are presented. It's like someone going around changing Ariel's eyes from blue to green, just cuz he likes the idea of Ariel being green-eyed. Thinks don't work like that. My overall opinion on Minotaurgurl. I think it's safe to say the interent is better off without her. She's toxic, she's a nuisance, she's talks trash to people just cuz they disagree with her, she lies, she mangles, twists and misrepresents other people's words, and she causes edit wars. Action needs to be taken against people like this. "

This is not a forum. Sorry, but you might wanna take your message elsewhere.

FINISHING MOVE WHY DOES THE MOSS COVERED THREE HANDLES FAMILY GREDUNZEL FINISHER REDIRECT TO THE CAT IN THE HAT WHEN YOU CLICK IT?

Why is Slim Virgin so interested in all of these controversial Jew-related topics? Oh, that's right, its because she is defending the Jewish faith. Except that her entire point of view, on all of the topics, opposes the wishes of Jewish people. Perhaps Slim Virgin is angry at something. Perhaps she is the embodiment of this article.

Hilarious. DYN that two-thirds of a pun is P-U? At least we know there's an end to this discussion.

" Thank you so much, Abstrakt, this is very helpful! I sometimes take entire months off, so don't worry for taking a few days to respond. And yes you're right, the Shunzhi Emperor is referred to as ""šidzu eldembure hūwangdi"" in Manchu documents written after his death, just like he is named Shizu in equivalent Chinese documents. These are the emperor's temple names. But I've seen a few Shunzhi-era documents in Manchu, and the date is marked as ""ijishūn dasan, Xth year, Xth month, etc."" Since the Wiki conventionally use reign names to refer to Ming and Qing emperors, ""ijishūn dasan"" should be good. I also find that form more interesting than ""šidzu eldembure hūwangdi,"" which after all is a transcription from the Chinese (""šidzu"" = Shizu ) followed by a generic title that applies to all Manchu emperors! Thank you again for the help! Cheers, "

Because I have the IQ of a small lump of butter. )

Editing Hi there, Frecklefoot. I've been reading your wiki pages and discussion and wondered if you might be interested in serving as a technical editor for an upcoming book on the greatest games ever made (to be published by Focal Press). I'm the author of Dungeons & Desktops and my co-author Bill Loguidice has published a multitude of articles on Armchair Arcade and Gamasutra. The pay would be $500. Please let me know if you are interested; prefer email at mattbarton.exe at gmail.com.

" ""No where in any of Wiki's policies is the concept of avoiding opinions."" - from WP:NPOV: ""Avoid stating opinions as facts"". In addition, notability is not based upon opinions; it is based upon objective criteria laid out at length in WP:N."

I'd appreciate some help from someone, I have been blocked I posted a long and very good response to the David Shankebone problem on the page Edit conflict: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incid. And someone came and erased it and blocked me. I'd appreciate it if someone could go and repost my response. There was nothing offensive about it. I have a right to defend my point of view.

Organization I reorganized the page a bit just now, because the second heading was completely blank. It looked to me that it just needed to have its sub-sections demoted, (which is what I did), but if it was actually blank due to vandalism, could someone fix it? I couldn't see any tons'o'deletion vandalism in recent edits...

Copyright Problems As suggested above, a quick google search found the plot description here and here. Most likely lifted from the primary source, I'm guessing.

" Regulus not Flaminius As another reader of this article has noticed, there is a mistake in the part ""Strategic Background"" where it is written that Gaius Flaminius received the command from Fabius after the end of the latter's dictatorship. In fact, however, by then (the autumn of 217 BC) it was six months since Flaminius had rested in peace at the Lake Trasimene. He was replaced by Marcus Atilius Regulus (check Livy, XXII.25,31-32 and Polybius, III.114). I'm putting it in the article. "

New Bullet needed for New York City Subway Hi, I don't know how to create SVG graphics. The template {{NYCS Jerome}} was changed recently to include a 4 diamond that doesn't exist. Can you transform this 5 diamond into a 4 diamond?

Where is the inline reply?

Too Bad, Blocker! Too Bad, Blocker! I am un blocking!

" Complete Coverage Finished roughing in a complete coverage of Historicist though through the Church Age. 1) End of Immediacy (or ""imminence""). 2) 4th Century to East-West Schism, with explanation of some differences. 3) Schism to Reformation. 4) Post-Reformation developments. There is one section that didn't even make sense in the original article left over. Someone feel free to figure out where it fits in. Haven't added references yet. Spent the last three days collecting them, just haven't done them yet. Ike "

They are copyrighted by default, as virtually everything is (see Wikipedia:Copyrights). Read Wikipedia:Publicity photos very carefully; the definition of promotional images is a bit narrower than Jaranda stated above, though all these HOF images don't meet those requirements either. All of them are going to have to be removed. Please consider going through and tag them all {{db-unfree}} (see WP:CSD for more info) instead of leaving all of the work for others. There have been numerous discussions of images on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League that might interest you, but the common thread is that there are very few football images on the internet that are suitable for Wikipedia. Ideas about the fair use of magazine covers in articles that aren't about that magazine (or that don't have significant written content about the magazine) are currently in flux too. I've said this several times before, but it's a good idea to check with others before making changes to a large number of pages. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. ×

im not sorry for what i did FUCK Jclemens

I didn't add the citation request, merely commented on it.

Your edit to Neela Rasgotra Your edit to Neela Rasgotra was fuckin' wonderful.

I read her journals. The date refers to when they would have been reopened, not when he actually did the sealing. If my memory is correct, he unsealed them for the unabridged publication.

Because if you do, I will continue to cry like a little bitch and report you to the higher Wikithorities!

" At my sweet home. P And you? (Talk) "

Record Keeping Requirements When has this been updated? This does not even match this article here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_Internet_pornography#United_States (A Wikipedia article what about that).

" you fool THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS A ""ULTRA-NATIONALIST"" POLITICAL PARTY IN FRANCE DURING THE REVOLUTION. FACT. You can Google all you want, but it won't change that simple fact. The abstract concepts of ""nationalism"" or even ""ultra-nationalism"" are one thing, but a political party? No, sorry babe. You're wrong. Embarrassingly wrong. Accept it, and move on baby boy."

suck your filthy erect penis

August 2013 I'll try to explain as simply as possible. The image to the right shows approximately this location (Google Maps link). If one looks at the map, s/he will find that the road there is labelled Ratchadamri, Not Si Lom. The area is Pathum Wan District, not Bang Rak, where Si Lom is. The buildings in the background are King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, not skyscrapers on Si Lom Road. I hope I have established that this image is inappropriate for use in this article, though, of course, it could find proper use elsewhere. Thank you.

RE: Fanta logo That was the only one I could get. I thought the cans where good but users didnt like it. TLK | Y!

By the way, we are still waiting on you to explain your argument as to how the sources cited actually support the assertion the IP made in this article.

" {| style=""background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |- | style=""border: 1px solid #084080; background-color: #F5FFFA; vertical-align: top; color: #000;""| Hello, 79.167.21.144, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""

5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" !

doesn't work for it). The other is

September 2009 (UTC) Look Agent Orange, I don't care any more. It's *EXPLETIVE DELETED* people such as yourself that make Wikipedia such a shoddy source of misinformation. Write whatever you like, and keep living inside that dark dank Watchtower. However, you're mistaken on the long list of authors for the CV article. Hey, have a riot. *Yawn* 20:20, 7

No, it's not quite; see Wikipedia:Speedy keep.

" Look, the Anglophobic vigilante has come bearing ill news and ""ill news is an ill guest"". Watch out, Tyke, he considers himself to have inviolate powers of edit warring upon your contributions, now that he sees some other people have an unrelated dispute with you. All the more ""justification"" for him to run roughshod over you to get what he wants. It's been done before. Just check at my own edits for proof. "

" Beethoven and Romanticism The article currently states ""If we consider the Romantic movement as an aesthetic epoch in literature and the arts generally, Beethoven sits squarely in the first half along with literary Romantics such as the German poets Goethe and Schiller"". From my limited understanding of the history of German literature, neither Goethe or Schiller are considered to be part of the Romantic movement, and therefore this statement is incorrect. "

You're edits seem a strange mixture of both fixing and practising vandalism. Is your acount being used by multiple users? Whatever your intentions are, please note that everything you do is logged and looked at. If you want to make constructive edits, you are always welcome to do so. But if you continue to harm other peoples work, you will eventually be blocked for good. Cheers,

. Next time add it quicker you sorry sack of shit.

Thank you for contacting me. I will proceed with that project on asap. I delayed it because I am waiting for new username, and I didn't want to do all the research and have it made irrelevant/somewhat incorrect by intervening edits. Unfortuantely, I'm heading out of town tomorrow and will be gone through Sunday. Thanks again.

what does it mean/translate - 'near pubens'?? 85.141.91.178

" are not paid to edit on behalf of the institution paying them ; huh? Some indeed are! Some are specifically tasked to improve the article about their institution ;) What you've established, I think, is that some paid editing is ok. All we are negotiating over is where to draw the line... I think you'l find I largely agree with you over that line. But it doesn't seem Jimbo is - I wrote an article in the field my company works, on company time (don't worry - no COI issues!), at the suggestion of my employer. It seems that this is ""disgusting"" and unethical ( Errant (chat!) "

I will accept this block, but I can't begin to understand how Big Dunc has not been reprimanded for his behaviour (Baiting, tagging, bullying and intimidation) When I return, I'll stay out of his way if he's stays out of mine.

September Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Ryanair Destinations, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. 76.19.222.40 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Aer Lingus Destinations, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. 76.19.222.40

" Straw Poll The purpose of this poll is to gage current consensus as to the members sections of the Beatles infobox. I suggest we list all six ex-Beatles as ""Past Members"", and leave the ""Current Members"" field empty, as the band was dissolved in 1975, and has since not reformed. "

No it says OSCARS all over the place. The official website is OSCARS.com. Other countries know of this as the Oscars. Take a look around this is not a worldwide view. And, stop removing the tags until this is settled.

" Morphology I think that a few words should be written about endings of various kinds, and of distinctions of cases. There seems to be some misunderstandings here and there in the project, with claims that ""German has preserved the proto-germanic grammar"" or similarly. This is not 100% true (although German certainly has preserved much of the grammar). I therefore think that mentioning the instrumental case, and the fact that there were more different endings in OHG than in modern High German is interesting enough to merit a section. I do not think we should try to reproduce all paradigms; but some representative sample. (However, I just know them from rather old books; and these books do not very carefully distinguish different epochs or dialects within the OHG.) I had in mind an example like this:   Sing. Pl. N tag taga G tages tago D tage tagum A tag taga I tagu (not distinguishable) and a few words on how e.g. 1:st and 3:rd p. pl. of the verbs then were quite distinct (in pres. ind. normally ending in -mes and -nt, and in pret. -m and -n, respectively); where in the modern language a final -m is replaced by an -n, making the forms indistinguishable. Is this sensible? "

" She may not have used those precise words, but she did say ""Toss it out and start over? Yes, because it's based on a false premise. Our health care system is based on the premise that health care is a commodity like VCRs or computers and that it should be distributed according to the ability to pay in the same way that consumer goods are. That's not what health care should be. Health care is a need; it's not a commodity, and it should be distributed according to need. If you're very sick, you should have a lot of it. If you're not sick, you shouldn't have a lot of it."" I think the editor who added that line to the article summarised the position in that way. Smmarising the long piece as ""incremental changes in a free-market system are ""doomed to fail"" does not seem inacurate to me because she is calling for wholesale reform and stating that free market principles should not apply. You may or may not agree with that, but that is what she is arguing. I do not think you should delete it but if needed add a fuller quote. "

okay. put your suggested edit here and I'll insert it for you.

" Every market has its protocols. Indeed, you could define ""market"" as a set of exchange protocols. Wikipedia cannot handle controversy. The emblem at the top of the article (""this article needs the attention of an expert""), while seeming to condemn, in a badge of honor. Wikipedia's ""regulatory capture"" by a technologically advanced minority is a good example of dependency theory. The lynchpin of economic theory is the idea that people do better when they encounter each other as equals. Some institutions allow that, some discourage it.64.223.225.221 "

LeaveSleaves you have been reported to the FBI Cyber Crimes division. Please continue editing and make a further case agianst yourself.

" Relax guys. I'm sorry you thought it was rude; that's not what I was going for. I can be a poor judge of what will or won't be controversial. Just remember if you don't like it it's as simple as undoing it. Now, Alec2011 says that I don't understand what the page is for. I'm sorry, there isn't anything that gives a specific ""mission statement"" for the article anywhere. So can you tell me? Just going on my own, I figured that if people want to know which songs are on which albums, they would just go to the album articles themselves. So having them organized that way seemed redundant to me. It seems that the only point to having an article like this is to show where the songs appear in the series. Because there is so much overlap between where they appear in the series and where they appear in the albums I did it this way. And if your main complaint is that it's harder to edit because the list is too long, then we could always divide it by season. So there, I've opened a discussion. Be nice please. "

Now that it is properly licensed, I can put it on commons. I am not saying you made a mistake, just that a precision was needed. They are very strict about the licensing there )

Death problems On the page, it says that George died from a Brain Tumor durring sugery, but i have two books that say he died the morning after. One of the books is titled 'Introducing Gershwin' by Roland Vernon.