More gemma 2 llama.cpp merges, do they require GGUF regen again?
#6
by
IHadToMakeAccount
- opened
This comment has been hidden
Yes you should, I'm working on the re-conversion right now
IHadToMakeAccount
changed discussion title from
More gemma 2 llama.cpp merges, do they need to be require GGUF regen again?
to More gemma 2 llama.cpp merges, do they require GGUF regen again?
thank you for requanting 3 (!!) times.
Any time, we're on latest again :D
Is anyone keeping count? :D
https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/8228#issuecomment-2213014331