Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -14,19 +14,8 @@ pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
|
14 |
[![PyPI version qa-metrics](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/qa-metrics.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/qa-metrics/)
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-
QA-Evaluation-Metrics is a fast and lightweight Python package for evaluating question-answering models. It provides various basic metrics to assess the performance of QA models. Check out our **CFMatcher
|
18 |
|
19 |
-
If you find this repo avialable, please cite our paper:
|
20 |
-
```bibtex
|
21 |
-
@misc{li2024cfmatch,
|
22 |
-
title={CFMatch: Aligning Automated Answer Equivalence Evaluation with Expert Judgments For Open-Domain Question Answering},
|
23 |
-
author={Zongxia Li and Ishani Mondal and Yijun Liang and Huy Nghiem and Jordan Boyd-Graber},
|
24 |
-
year={2024},
|
25 |
-
eprint={2401.13170},
|
26 |
-
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
27 |
-
primaryClass={cs.CL}
|
28 |
-
}
|
29 |
-
```
|
30 |
|
31 |
## Installation
|
32 |
|
@@ -85,6 +74,19 @@ match_result = cfm.cf_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
|
|
85 |
print("Score: %s; CF Match: %s" % (scores, match_result))
|
86 |
```
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
## Updates
|
89 |
- [01/24/24] 🔥 The full paper is uploaded and can be accessed [here]([https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14566](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13170)). The dataset is expanded and leaderboard is updated.
|
90 |
- Our Training Dataset is adapted and augmented from [Bulian et al](https://github.com/google-research-datasets/answer-equivalence-dataset). Our [dataset repo](https://github.com/zli12321/Answer_Equivalence_Dataset.git) includes the augmented training set and QA evaluation testing sets discussed in our paper.
|
|
|
14 |
[![PyPI version qa-metrics](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/qa-metrics.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/qa-metrics/)
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
+
QA-Evaluation-Metrics is a fast and lightweight Python package for evaluating question-answering models. It provides various basic metrics to assess the performance of QA models. Check out our paper [**CFMatcher**](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13170), a matching method going beyond token-level matching and is more efficient than LLM matchings but still retains competitive evaluation performance of transformer LLM models.
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
20 |
## Installation
|
21 |
|
|
|
74 |
print("Score: %s; CF Match: %s" % (scores, match_result))
|
75 |
```
|
76 |
|
77 |
+
If you find this repo avialable, please cite our paper:
|
78 |
+
```bibtex
|
79 |
+
@misc{li2024cfmatch,
|
80 |
+
title={CFMatch: Aligning Automated Answer Equivalence Evaluation with Expert Judgments For Open-Domain Question Answering},
|
81 |
+
author={Zongxia Li and Ishani Mondal and Yijun Liang and Huy Nghiem and Jordan Boyd-Graber},
|
82 |
+
year={2024},
|
83 |
+
eprint={2401.13170},
|
84 |
+
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
85 |
+
primaryClass={cs.CL}
|
86 |
+
}
|
87 |
+
```
|
88 |
+
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
## Updates
|
91 |
- [01/24/24] 🔥 The full paper is uploaded and can be accessed [here]([https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14566](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13170)). The dataset is expanded and leaderboard is updated.
|
92 |
- Our Training Dataset is adapted and augmented from [Bulian et al](https://github.com/google-research-datasets/answer-equivalence-dataset). Our [dataset repo](https://github.com/zli12321/Answer_Equivalence_Dataset.git) includes the augmented training set and QA evaluation testing sets discussed in our paper.
|