AgentOhana: Design Unified Data and Training Pipeline for Effective Agent Learning
Abstract
Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant research attention. However, fully harnessing the potential of LLMs for agent-based tasks presents inherent challenges due to the heterogeneous nature of diverse data sources featuring multi-turn trajectories. In this paper, we introduce AgentOhana as a comprehensive solution to address these challenges. AgentOhana aggregates agent trajectories from distinct environments, spanning a wide array of scenarios. It meticulously standardizes and unifies these trajectories into a consistent format, streamlining the creation of a generic data loader optimized for agent training. Leveraging the data unification, our training pipeline maintains equilibrium across different data sources and preserves independent randomness across devices during dataset partitioning and model training. Additionally, we present xLAM-v0.1, a large action model tailored for AI agents, which demonstrates exceptional performance across various benchmarks.
Community
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Large Language Model Agent for Hyper-Parameter Optimization (2024)
- Exploring Large Language Model based Intelligent Agents: Definitions, Methods, and Prospects (2024)
- An Interactive Agent Foundation Model (2024)
- Breaking Data Silos: Cross-Domain Learning for Multi-Agent Perception from Independent Private Sources (2024)
- Neeko: Leveraging Dynamic LoRA for Efficient Multi-Character Role-Playing Agent (2024)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Nice paper! Thanks for the insights.
Did you also compare two versions of xLAM, one trained with your standard format, and one just with various formats? I am curious on how much performance gain we got from standardizing the tool usage trajectories.
Models citing this paper 7
Browse 7 models citing this paperDatasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper