Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text
Abstract
Detecting text generated by modern large language models is thought to be hard, as both LLMs and humans can exhibit a wide range of complex behaviors. However, we find that a score based on contrasting two closely related language models is highly accurate at separating human-generated and machine-generated text. Based on this mechanism, we propose a novel LLM detector that only requires simple calculations using a pair of pre-trained LLMs. The method, called Binoculars, achieves state-of-the-art accuracy without any training data. It is capable of spotting machine text from a range of modern LLMs without any model-specific modifications. We comprehensively evaluate Binoculars on a number of text sources and in varied situations. Over a wide range of document types, Binoculars detects over 90% of generated samples from ChatGPT (and other LLMs) at a false positive rate of 0.01%, despite not being trained on any ChatGPT data.
Community
If this can truly detect any llm output that is based on transformers and uses the commoncrawl dataset, this is an absolute game changer
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representations (2024)
- Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectors (2023)
- CLAMP: Contrastive LAnguage Model Prompt-tuning (2023)
- Machine-Generated Text Detection using Deep Learning (2023)
- TextMachina: Seamless Generation of Machine-Generated Text Datasets (2024)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper