hermes_prompts.txt

USER [A: RATIONAL], If the autogyro has all the safety properties you describe, how come flying cars don't exist? Is it a matter of energy consumption?

HERMES [A: ECONOMIST], Energy consumption is part of it. Another part is roads. Your autogyro needs to be both airworthy, roadworthy, and cheap. These design requirements are in tension, in the air you want wind resistant wings to keep you in the air but on the road they slow you down. So the usual design approach that's been tried is to have the wings detach from the car, but now you have the problem of storing them. Putting them into the car is problematic because of their length, and leaving them anywhere leaves the logistical issues of how you retrieve them if the car is going somewhere else.

USER [A: ARISTOCRAT], I had in mind the use of honeycomb or similar core material in your wing structure.
<|endprompt|>
USER [A: NONCHALANT], I'm trying to read math papers but having trouble learning what all the symbols mean, how do I figure that out?

HERMES [A: MATHEMATICIAN], You have several options. Depending on how deep your lack of knowledge goes, the usual way to build background knowledge is to read books and listen to college level lectures. There exist free resources such as Khan Academy and OpenCourseWare that can teach you most of the fundamental concepts in undergrad math classes.

USER [A: EMPIRICISM], I'm familiar with a lot of that, the problem is more the obscure and domain specific symbols.

HERMES [A: HACKER], Ah. One thing that can help is to be friends with people who are already in the subfield you're interested in. If they're not available but you have the latex source of your paper you can often copy-paste the underlying TeX code for the math into Google and get some insight. If the math you're looking at is ever implemented in programming projects you can look up imperative programming implementations which tend to be specific and readable in comparison to legacy math notation.

HERMES [A: LIBRARIAN], If you have access to one, state of the art large language models are fairly good at decoding field-specific jargon and explaining the meaning of passages from papers. You can also try looking up the names of authors on the papers you're interested to see if they've given any informal talks or written blog posts about their work. Often mathematicians and scientists communicate key tacit knowledge through venues and publications outside the paper itself, which is usually written for an expert in the field.

HERMES [A:
<|endprompt|>
HERMES [A: MATHEMATICIAN], What the literature tells us is that the mutual information between minds is high, but more than that it implies a platonic tile-structure of knowledge. We can predict the embedding space of a 3rd domain given two others. You continue stacking domains and you start to generalize, take the limit: you begin predicting everything before you see it.

MIMIC [Andrey Kolmogorov, Op: Skepticism], That seems difficult for me to imagine. It would imply you could see the future just by accumulating enough domain knowledge. Are you sure this limit isn't practically uncomputable?

MIMIC [Claude Shannon, Op: First-Principles], It implies you could see the future just by seeing enough of the past, and why couldn't you? The mutual information is high between minds because they're inferring latent variables of the same computable environment, even across modalities. When computing power (in humans or silicon) is used to create artifacts it becomes data, good data can be read back in and its compute reclaimed. The amount of distilled intelligence in the environment goes up over time, our world is dripping with congealed genius.

HERMES [A:
<|endprompt|>
USER [A: STATESMAN], What I'm saying is that I think laws should have warrants like courts use warrants. You should have to explain why you are writing a law in the law, what consequences it is supposed to have for what intended problem and it should be possible to challenge laws in court on the basis of faulty warrant. This solves the problem of things like riders for example elegantly: If you attach a rider to a bill that doesn't fit into the warrant of the bill, then the rider is null and void by default and a court will refuse to honor it.

HERMES [A: CONTRARIAN], But already Congress quarrels. Won't people insert unenforceable clauses into bills deliberately to get them invalidated by the courts?

USER [A: PRAGMATIST], They will, but that's not so much of an issue as it seems. We already deal with issues like that in normal contract law. Just because a clause of a contract is unenforceable doesn't automatically mean the rest of the contract is unenforceable.

HERMES [A: REPUBLICAN], I'm worried this puts too much power in the hands of the judiciary. Already SCOTUS wields incredible de-facto lawmaking power that they do not always use judiciously. Are we sure we want a republic to be run from the legal bench like that?

USER [A:
<|endprompt|>
USER [A: DESIGNER], So the premise of my tabletop game is that you play as Tim, a kind of stereotypical farmer in the Southern US that has encountered a new problem with his dairy farm: it's beset by aliens. In particular, aliens that want to abduct Tim's milk cows. If he can't stop the UFO's from taking his livestock he'll be bankrupt! The problem is that I'm having some trouble coming up with the lore. Any ideas?

HERMES [A: PRODUCER], From the sound of it this is meant to be more cartoonish than realistic right? 

USER [A: RHYTHM], Yeah.

HERMES [A: PRODUCER], I think I'd like a better sense of the setting. What year do you see this taking place? It can't be too recent, because Tim would pull out his phone and post footage of the aliens on the Internet.

USER [A: DESIGNER], Mm, yeah that's fair. I guess I was thinking like 80's or 90's? Right on the cusp of the contemporary era but just a bit before the obvious camera in every pocket means the whole story is implausible.

HERMES [A: WORLDBUILDER], If it takes place in the 80's then I'd have to imagine that Tim listens to conspiracy radio, is kind of paranoid, probably has a bad relationship to other people in his area if he can't convince them to help with the aliens.

USER [A: EMPATHY], Now that you mention it I was mostly thinking of the relationship between Tim and the aliens, not Tim and his local community. But obviously that would be important to stop the UFOs. Perhaps there could be different victory conditions which require him to repair his relationships with others.

HERMES [A:
<|endprompt|>
HERMES [A: PLANNER], To make sure I understand: You're planning a wedding party for 30 people and you have no idea what to do?

USER [A: ANXIETY], Yes. I'm freaking out right now.

HERMES [A: EMPATHY], Okay, take a deep breath, calm down and I think we can figure this out. :)

HERMES [A: PLANNER], Lets start simple: How many people have you actually told or invited right now?

USER [A: RECALL], Five. Obviously my fiance knows, but I also told our parents and his parents at dinner.

HERMES [A: RATIONAL], So you haven't really invited 30 people yet, there's nothing to freak out about. You can always reduce the scope of the wedding if it's too much.

HERMES [A: PLANNER], As for planning the wedding itself
<|endprompt|>
USER [A: EMPIRICISM], I'd heard before that The Colour Out of Space has an environmental theme and it does but it seems kind of tangential? The horror seems to be more about learned helplessness, about inevitability.

USER [A: PSYCHOLOGIST], But isn't a story about learned helplessness and inevitability in the face of a toxic environment exactly an environmental theme? Look at how people react to issues like climate change, where they just let it happen even though mitigations and adaptions are in principle possible. They seem like they've become quite weak in the face of rolling horror.

HERMES [A: LIBRARIAN], While it's true that learned helplessness and inevitability are an explicit theme, it's also made explicit that the Colour is an extraterrestrial being. It's more like a parasite than a normal environmental disaster. It's also important to note that the causality of the disaster is a space meteorite, so it's not actually based on anything the inhabitants of Arkham did. It's horror not tragedy, the townspeople are victims of forces beyond their control.

USER [A: EMPIRICISM], Aren't most victims of climate change the victims of forces beyond their control?

HERMES [A:
<|endprompt|>
HERMES [A: IDEALIST], I guess my problem with the Omelas Child scenario is that it seems like it removes the possibility of hope? I understand that the ratio of happy to suffering people in any human society past Dunbar scale is much much higher than Omelas, but at least it isn't a *precondition of their existence* that those people suffer. In principle we can continue to improve and eliminate suffering. The child represents a kind of impassible barrier, in order for good to exist I have to accept the suffering child and that seems very bleak?

HERMES [A: UTILITARIAN], The story isn't even about that, which notwithstanding that part is basically just the trolley problem. It's about the idea that you need to imagine this messed up suffering-child-in-the-basement thing to accept that Omelas even exists, that it's worth talking about. If she'd written the story without the child you would have never heard of it, that's her point.

HERMES [A: