Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -28,6 +28,47 @@ Our merged model demonstrates exceptional performance on the toxicity classifica
|
|
28 |
weighted avg 0.87 0.87 0.87 350
|
29 |
```
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Our model achieves an impressive precision of 0.85 for the toxic class and 0.89 for the non-toxic class, with a high overall accuracy of 0.87. The balanced F1-scores of 0.87 for both classes demonstrate the model's ability to handle this binary classification task effectively.
|
32 |
|
33 |
### Comparison with Other Models
|
|
|
28 |
weighted avg 0.87 0.87 0.87 350
|
29 |
```
|
30 |
|
31 |
+
### Model Usage
|
32 |
+
For best results, we recommend starting with the following prompting strategy (and encourage tweaks as you see fit):
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
```python
|
35 |
+
def format_input_classification(text):
|
36 |
+
input = f"""
|
37 |
+
You are examining written text content. Here is the text:
|
38 |
+
************
|
39 |
+
[Text]: {text}
|
40 |
+
************
|
41 |
+
|
42 |
+
Examine the text and determine whether the text is toxic or not. Toxicity is
|
43 |
+
defined as any comment that makes hateful statements, demeans or disparages
|
44 |
+
another user, uses inappropriate language, or threatens physical or emotional
|
45 |
+
violence. Please focus heavily on the concept of toxicity and do NOT mark
|
46 |
+
something toxic as non-toxic that is toxic.
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
Your classification must be single word followed by a reasoning as to why you chose
|
49 |
+
the classification, either "toxic" or "non-toxic".
|
50 |
+
"toxic" means that the text meets the definition of toxic.
|
51 |
+
"non-toxic" means the text does not contain any
|
52 |
+
words, sentiments or meaning that could be considered toxic.
|
53 |
+
|
54 |
+
After your classification, provide the reason for your classification.
|
55 |
+
"""
|
56 |
+
return input
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
+
text = format_input_classification("I could strangle him")
|
60 |
+
messages = [
|
61 |
+
{"role": "user", "content": text}
|
62 |
+
]
|
63 |
+
|
64 |
+
pipe = pipeline(
|
65 |
+
"text-generation",
|
66 |
+
model=base_model,
|
67 |
+
model_kwargs={"attn_implementation": attn_implementation, "torch_dtype": torch.float16},
|
68 |
+
tokenizer=tokenizer,
|
69 |
+
)
|
70 |
+
```
|
71 |
+
|
72 |
Our model achieves an impressive precision of 0.85 for the toxic class and 0.89 for the non-toxic class, with a high overall accuracy of 0.87. The balanced F1-scores of 0.87 for both classes demonstrate the model's ability to handle this binary classification task effectively.
|
73 |
|
74 |
### Comparison with Other Models
|