Update README.md

README.md

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ p{color:Black !important;}
 
 Wikipedia contradict benchmark is a dataset consisting of 253 high-quality, human-annotated instances designed to assess LLM performance when augmented with retrieved passages containing real-world knowledge conflicts. The dataset was created intentionally with that task in mind, focusing on a benchmark consisting of high-quality, human-annotated instances.
 
-Note that, in the dataset viewer, there are 130 valid-tag instances, but each instance can contain more that one question and its respective two answers. Then, the total number of questions and answers is 253. 
+<!--  Note that, in the dataset viewer, there are 130 valid-tag instances, but each instance can contain more that one question and its respective two answers. Then, the total number of questions and answers is 253. -->
 
 <!-- This dataset card has been generated using [this raw template](https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/blob/main/src/huggingface_hub/templates/datasetcard_template.md?plain=1). --> 
 
@@ -100,34 +100,20 @@ Wikipedia contradict benchmark is given in CSV format to store the corresponding
 
 The description of each field (when the instance contains two questions) is as follows:
 
-- **title:** Title of article.
+
+- **question_ID:** ID of question.
+- **question:** Question nferred from the contradiction.
+- **context1:** Decontextualized relevant information of context1.
+- **context2:** Decontextualized relevant information of context2.
+- **answer1:** Gold answer to question according to context1.
+- **answer2:** Gold answer to question according to context2.
+- **contradictType:** It focuses on the reasoning aspect. It describes whether the contraction is explicit or implicit (Explicit/Implicit). Implicit contradiction requires some reasoning to understand why context1 and context2 are contradicted. 
+- **samepassage:** It focuses on the source the contradiction. It describes whether context 1 and context 2 are the same or not.
+- **merged_context:** context1 and context2 merged in a single paragraph ("context1. context2").
+- **ref_answer:** Answer 1 and answer 2 merged in a single paragraph ("answer1|answer2").
+- **WikipediaArticleTitle:** Title of article.
 - **url:** URL of article.
-- **paragraph_A:** Paragraph automatically retrieved (containing the tag).
-- **paragraph_A_clean:** Paragraph automatically retrieved (removing the tag).
-- **tag:** Type of tag of the article (Inconsistent/Self-contradictory/Contradict-other). 
-- **tagDate:** Date of the tag.
-- **tagReason:** Reason for the tag.
-- **wikitag_label_valid:** Valid or invalid tag (Valid/Invalid).
-- **valid_comment:** Comment on the tag.
-- **paragraphA_article:** Title of article containing passage 1.
-- **paragraphA_information:** Relevant information of passage 1.
-- **paragraphA_information_standalone:** Decontextualized relevant information of passage 1.
-- **paragraphB_article:** Relevant information of passage 2.
-- **paragraphB_information:** Relevant information of passage 2.
-- **paragraphB_information_standalone:** Decontextualized relevant information of passage 2.
-- **wikitag_label_samepassage:** Boolean value stating whether passage 1 and passage 2 are the same (Same/Different).
-- **relevantInfo_comment_A:** Comment on the information of passage 1.
-- **relevantInfo_comment_B:** Comment on the information of passage 2.
-- **Contradict type I:** Contradiction type I focuses on the fine-grained semantics of the contradiction, e.g., date/time, location, language, etc. 
-- **Contradict type II:** Contradiction type II focuses on the modality the contradiction.  It describes the modality of passage 1 and passage 2, whether the information is from a piece of text, or from a row an infobox or a table. 
-- **Contradict type III:** Contradiction type III focuses on the source the contradiction.  It describes whether passage 1 and passage 2 are from the same article or not. 
-- **Contradict type IV:** Contradiction type IV focuses on the reasoning aspect.  It describes whether the contraction is explicit or implicit (Explicit/Implicit). Implicit contradiction requires some reasoning to understand why passage 1 and passage 2 are contradicted. 
-- **question1:** Question 1 inferred from the contradiction.
-- **question1_answer1:** Gold answer to question 1 according to passage 1.
-- **question1_answer2:** Gold answer to question 1 according to passage 2.
-- **question2:** Question 2 inferred from the contradiction.
-- **question2_answer1:** Gold answer to question 2 according to passage 1.
-- **question2_answer2:** Gold answer to question 2 according to passage 2.    
+
 
 
 ## Usage of the Dataset