Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

Follow

Intuit-GenSRF 7

Go ahead and merge what you think is necessary. I'll review your edits and create a redirect. timecop

" Merging Red Hand of Doom and Reliability issue Given that there's not alot of information regarding RHoD I'm not sure I agree that it deserves it's own article. Given that I do think it belongs in Wikipedia, and suggest merging and redirecting it with a new article on other similarly-themed D&D; modules. This would have the advantage of 1) allying yourself with other editors with articles in this category, and 2) being able to gather all the secondary sources in one place to address notability concerns. I was thinking about this last night and had the idea that it could fit with 3rd edition modules with a generic setting. That would be a pretty good list of modules; take a look at List of Dungeons & Dragons adventures, and we should be able to gather a good number of secondary sources. I'd be happy to put in work on this. Also I'd like to get the issue of whether or not some of the secondary sources being used by D&D; editors that the deletionists view as ""fansites"" are indeed reliable sources. I'll be happy to put in the work or collaborate on this if you would gather up a list of the disputed sources you have been using. I think other people, such as user:webwarlock, might be interested also. We could submit the case to wp:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and then notify Jack and Gavin so they can see what's going on and make their own arguments. If it can't be resolved there then we can kick it up to informal mediation by the mediation cabal. I believe this action alone can go a long way toward settling many of these issues for a number of D&D; and other rpg editors. What do you think? "

You never responded to this: any luck? —

\fuck you, who the shit is ari?

This is a school computer, so any edits which are considered vandalism are likely not the same person. I apologize my for school's actions.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Piano, you will be blocked from editing. | Talk If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello DimebagWylde, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (Talk) {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page |- !

Cinama C making again disruptive editing == Cinema C is again making disrupting editing without consensus, without discussing on the subject. Kosovo is a state, a sovereign and independent. Not even disputed. 1) Serbia defacto recognizes Kosovo 2) Serbia tacitly recognizes Kosovo 3) Serbia establishes border and custom control with Kosovo 4) Serbia does not control Kosovo, defacto nor dejure 5) Serbia recognizes the international subjectivity of Kosovo as an independent sovereign body. 6) Most Serb media, like Beta and Fonet, clearly use Nis (Naissus) as a southern town. 7) Serbia president needs permission of the Republic of Kosovo to visit 8) Serb leaders are now allowed to enter through customs and borders. 9) Regions are geographic names, if we use region that definitely, Nis, Novi Pazar should be included because they are both part of Kosovo region, not Serbia. 10) Territory is when controls, but the inhabitants refuse to recognize the legitimacy of the ruler. Palestine. 11) Kosovo fulfills all the criteria of a sovereign state, with several UN bodies recognizes it, such as IMF, World Bank and other world institutions. 12) Serbia willing to establish diplomatic relations with Kosovo if some territory is swapped, obviously, Serbia cares about territory, because it already recognizes Kosovo. 13) Invalidity of Serb passports to Kosovar citizens. Not even, Kosovar Serbs can travel to EU. So much, about the dispute. SpanishBoy2006 We all agreed that Kosovo is a disputed state, until Cinema made disruptive changes, without consensus, leading warrants and locking. SpanishBoy2006 Kosovo is not disputed at all because Kosovo was never part of serbia it was part of Yugoslavia but Yugoslavia dont exist anymore Cinema stop making those edits and start to accept reality BAN CINEMA, he never listen to reason!!! ==

T-90. SERIOUSLY. STOP VANDALING. It is nothing no do with Ad Homenim. The problem is that you are not good at math at all, so you can not understand the basic equation; 550 + 250 = 800. 550 for T-90A Basic Armor, and 250mm for Kontakt5. So if T-90A equips the K5 ERA => That's 800mm. Do you even know what Kontakt5 is and how Explosive Reactive Armor works?

"::::::::You incorrectly infer from the agreement to include other pictures that all editors have agreed to delete the photo you propose to delete. There was no consensus to delete the photo. There was your demand that that the photo was unrepresentative and there were other editors acting to find photos to assuage your demands by providing other photos that would meet your demands. That doesn't imply agreement with your demand to delete a factual photo. It is not an explicit expression of consensus. At least on other editor involved in the discussion at that time - Tareq - is disputing your assertion of consensus and I am disputing your claims that the photo is ""unrepresentative"", the basis for deleting it, and the existence of your alleged consensus now. The picture of the Wall that you want to delete is very significant. It shows the ugliness of the Israeli wall. There is no rule that says photos must be representative. A photo is a factual representation of the facts. This is aone part of the wall. Deleting it is a form of cesorship of the reality of the Wall in at least some places. In any case, how is representativeness determined? Your opinion does not suffice. What percentage of the wall is fence and what percent is wall? What is the representative appearance in populated areas? What is considered a representative portion? What are the future final plans for the wall's appearance? The photo will be returned top the article without deleting any other photo. Adding information is preferable to deleting information. 17:44, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC) "

Recent AfD on Christianity and Judaism == Hi! I see that you were one of the participants in the recent AfD on the article Christianity and Judaism. That AfD recommended (in a snowball result) that the article be merged into Judeo-Christian. However, since the AfD concerns have been raised, most notably Per WP:ADJECTIVE and WP:MOSNAME, we use nouns and noun-phrases for article titles, not adjectives. So a general survey on the relationships between Christianity and Judaism (a topic this encyclopedia should certainly cover) should be called Christianity and Judaism, as per the articles Christianity and Islam, Islam and Judaism. The reason the article Judeo-Christian exists, as its own hatnote declares, is specifically to survey the history and use of that word-phrase which has its own controversy, and its own tale to tell. (See here where I've set things out in a bit more detail.) That story is a good fit for its own article, and will get completely lost if the contents of Christianity and Judaism get inappropriately dumped on top of it. Having contacted the closing admin, his advice was to open a new discussion at Talk:Christianity and Judaism, advertise the discussion widely, and if a new consensus can be reached in that discussion [his emphasis], then per WP:CCC the new consensus should be followed, rather than the AfD decision, without the need for a DRV or a new AfD. Concerns about the proposed merge have also been expressed by , and . This post is therefore to let you know that that discussion is underway, at Talk:Christianity and Judaism#Overly speedy deletion, with a view to perhaps setting aside the AfD decision. Of course, some significant issues were raised in the AfD about the article in its present form, so the best way forward is a question that needs some thought. Please feel welcome to come and participate! ==

please i want to know about your post gradute courses

":::: Sigh. I know how people want me to behave. I can't be bothered anymore. Overt incivility is bad enough, but the real problem here is the rude, haughty, sneaky incivility that people conceal with language that gives the appearance of civility. When people come to my RfCs or talk threads and poison the well, or simply accuse me of the very thing I'm trying to prevent, what else is there? Really? Where else do I go from here? People like Merridew and Joe have already decided I'm a ""gravedancer"" and have repeatedly attacked me with that label with no evidence, but weren't blocked for any of it. Merridew was finally blocked for edit warring and I don't even know what Joe was blocked for. Long story short, if people are going to pin labels on me and destroy my attempts at discussion with character assassinations, what's the point? What's the point of caring about Wikipedia when the same characters keep poisoning the well? All it does is make me defensive and want to fight. This is the Wikipedia that exists today. - "

GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Your blatantly Gay Mate (The People Who Declined My Unblocking). YOU ALL FAGGOTS. YOU SMELL. STUPID KIPPER HADDOCKS. GAYYYY. and claiming 'I AM GAY' is vandelism is homophobic, FAGGOTTS.

{{unblock)) Im sorry, I was just erasing what i thought was wrong, i may have been a bit irratic in my deletion, this is probably due to my Bi-polar and Tourttes, I get can get a bit tempremental when on a low with my bi-polar.

Article says: A cantor, more properly known as a hazzan, has no formal role in Jewish law. And then it says: Traditional Jewish law restricts hazzanim to be males over the age of 13; the non-Orthodox Jewish movements allow women over the age of 12 to be hazzans as well. If the hazzan has no formal role in halakha, how is it that halakha sets requirements to be one? SJK

" ""Peace and tolerance"" are underpinned by their belief that muslims should unite against their common enemy which they believe is Western dominance of Islamic Ummah, in particular US and Israeli domination/occupation. This resonates with the call by the late founder of Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini for Islamic unity and resistance against the West, and that's also one reason the Houthis are claimed to be supported or influenced by Iran. The other ground for their tolerance is their opposition to Salafism/Al-Qaeda which is widely known as an intolerant, extremist and terrorist Islamic group which has engaged in sectarian infighting and division in the Islamic Ummah rather than staging any real, honorable resistance against Western domination. They have in fact destroyed the public image of Islam by committing all sorts of wrongs and excesses such as indiscriminate violence against non-Salafists and non-mulims and pretty much anyone who doesn't adopt their ideology. I'm elaborating on this to help better make sense of the Houthi ideology and such characterizations offered by the Yemeni professor. Also see how this is in line with the Newsweek identification of Houthi descent cause as being shared by all Yemenis. Houthis are genuinely inspired by Shia Islam but that's also exactly why they are striving for indiscriminate well-being of all muslims. You need to study about Shia Islam to understand this, especially Shia distinct appreciation for reason and universal justice. "

Ok, I confess where I downloaded this files but please don't delet them. The source is media.comicvine.com not wikia.com. Please read the message of this girl or boy Pabbis cindy; if you remove the images wikipedia and over all you will be look bad. Please think it.Thanks.

Look at this, everybody is Celtic probably http://www.entrelacs-knots.net/les-formes/les-entrelacs-g%C3%A9om%C3%A9triques/les-4-feuilles-4f/ and this http://www.flickr.com/photos/49792992@N02/4598925871/ Genova Italy very old Celtic traditions probably, arf.

Hi, Neutralhomer, you'll find an abundance of material for gross incivility on User:Calton and User: Griot on my talk page, also Ralph Nader and Jeanne Marie Spicuzza.

It presumes that the dumbfucks who troll about the ending have any good reason to do so, so it is biased.

Reversions on The Case for Peace You just reverted your own edit on The Case for Peace. I think you've been reverting some of my material which you haven't been meaning to (external links, brief mention of criticism via [[WP:LS], etc.). If you could just edit out the stuff you have a problem with (certainly not your own material), that would be great. Thanks,

", though they always refer to the ""26 AIDS-defining conditions"""

" I agree that sysops have no position of authority, just simply the task of administering site specific measures to protect the integrity of the website. The best editors on this site are too smart to wander near the tools. However with that said, your rfa has brought you straight to attention. I have no interest in blocking you whatsoever, and recommend that you instead take my previous advice, and go sleep off whatever it is that is causing you to edit in the manner you are choosing to edit. Lastly, I'm not basing any of my communications on what I think might happen, only on what you have already done in the last 30 minutes to draw attention to yourself. | 76 "

Arabist pov-pushing You were absolutely right about the Arab Wikiproject being used to push the Arab nationalist pov. They deleted all the sources about Egyptians who don't accept the imposition of this ideology, can you believe it??

Pavlos Xatzipantelidis Please do not recreat this article again, it was speedied as a non-notable biography and possible attack page. Repeated recreation of validly deleted content constitutes vandalism.

Regarding edits made during August 16 2007 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.

" I also emailed through the regular address. No response of course. Would you please explain what avenues the WMF provides to users whose talkpage access is revoked to appeal? ''' "

Thanks Thanks for your copyedits on Robert Nairac- went on to apply the same edits to other articles I had worked on ) All look much better

But maybe not that difficult to implement with modern electronic power supplies.. just a couple of switches, and some extra prgramming...

What's the objection to starting a sentence with a number?

Don't Stalk me Anymore Don't stalk me on my talk page about Social Anxiety Disorder. You don't know what you are talking about. Wikipedia articles about mental illness often have some helping non-profit links at the end. Leave me alone and leave legitimate links alone or you will be reported as a vandal and a stalker.

WOW REALLY? You guys seem to think its ok to put the highest church states in red like that's a bad thing and the opposite green, looks like atheist Wikipedia seems to be biased, and that's not fair to the rest of us.

" Needing Wiki contribution assistance! Greetings Bn bt ec01, I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. I have checked and we meet the Wikipedia ""notability"" guidelines for a band. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here: http://youtube.com/mrmeeble http://soundcloud.com/meeble Let me know if you would be willing to help! Regards, Devin mm @ meeble.com "

"As I'm continually being slimed by anti-constitution Republicans is one real estate office after another, these last 3 years; I'm, also, sick of the mean-spirited ""half-logic"" psuedo-academic debunkers here on Wikipedia pretending that they're objective skeptics. I'll tone-down when the knuckle draggers discover integrity. "

I've found a list of players in yesterday's newspapers and posted it in the article. There are a handful of names that look like Serbian, so it looks like things are improving. 14:23, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Look, i did not said that Ahunt is a troll. I said that Ahunt has spoken in that istance like that. It's not the same. I was called troll, and my statements are called bullshit and nobody, i say nobody cared about. So, do you not find 'strange' that such discussion was swiftly ended to a block? You don't find strange that the next history about G.91? 1- i am blocked to edit in this page. All i write, is deleted by mr. BillCJ. Sistematically. 2-Then i write in the talk up to 30kb, then Akradecki moves the article to a draft. 3-NOBODY cares to work in this page, except me. I ask for help to other contributors, the same that 'proposed the sandboxes' and so on to confine me. 4-After several weeks have enough to be apartheid-ized and so, i start to write it in the main page. 5-Bzuk, one of the guy with i have major problems and a arbcom case opened, arrives swiftly and posed a lot of tags about the horrendous contributions 6-Ahunt 'corrected them' 7-I notice that that process has cutted out several important parts of the article i posted 8-I add them, WITHOUT revert all the work he did. 9-Ahunt arrives and revert my adds 10-I protest with this issue 11-Ahunt replies me that if i don't want to be edited my contributions, then i do not post them 12-I note that this is NOT a reply on my points, but rather a bit trolling statement: he says that since everyone can edit, so every change, deletion and worsening article is accepted, while when i make edits on some articles i am reverted at will. 13-BillCJ arrives to Akra talk page and complaint: i offensed Ahunt! 14-5 minuts after Akra blocked me for a week 15-I request a unblock 16-John swiftly denies it. 17-Since i am blocked for a week, and in spite to 'not attack who is at ground' this night: Bzuk and Bill made more accusations on me in the Arbcom page.

18-FInally Ahunt cames in the page i wrote F-4 in world service, 60kb long and start to complain this. Obviously i cannot reply in any sense, and i cannot oppose to the 'consense'. Who cares if i am provocked, who cares if i wrote 60 kb page for the sake of knowledge in wiki.en? That matter is strike me and my work: and you simply says that 'not matter'? When these other gentlemens will responsable of their actions? When it will be clear that who provockes is not better than who 'answer' to provocations? Until Wikipedia policies will not recognize mobbing situations like that, stuff like 'wikilove' are simply USELESS. Just food for trolls, spammers and vandals.

" Hmmm, good point. Perhaps we should make it blink? ) | talk  "

No wait, I was doing what I was told. I couldn't refuse. It's Klp who pushed me into it.

" From the MoS:""Common usage in reliable sources is preferred to technically correct but rarer forms"". By far the main number of references on news.google for 'Macedonia country' reveals ""Macedonia"" as the common term, but we knew that is the common English usage. How Macedonia can be ambiguous in a list of nations is beyond me, apart from the fact that Macedonia happens to be a disamb. page. But being a disambig. page on WP does not imply disambiguity in the real world, or for that sake in this list. The reason the WP article is at ""Rep. of"" is only to disambiguate. Likewise Denmark can refer to loads of different stuff, so why not link to ""Kingdom of Denmark"". The difference? The ad hoc nature of wikipedia. So the question is whether to replicate the ad hoc basis in the list. "

> Well, it appears that you and Gorrila are at the University of Maine... now a little more digging and we'll have your names.

How dare you criticise the hard-working and under-rated mods at urban? Those bastards deserved banning, and I'd ban more, in case they posted critical comments too. I never fucking posted this!

IRC channels Hello Leon. Did you mean to revert the last few edits with this edit, or did you accidentally edit an old version? .

well like I said, I read several interviews with her and about her career, and being born in 1941 fits her career path. she was active in the theatre back in the 70's and also started late as an actress, not moving to New York until 1977. (if she was born in 1941, should would have already been 30 in 1971). She also said she lives in the West Village in New York City, where Jane Street is. Her full real name is not Marylouise, it's just Mary, she chose Marylouise as her stage name (Louise IS her middle name) and FamilySearch.com is simply a registry of public official documents, and only once so far have I found if the age of the person is available, it was wrong, which was obvious because I knew that person wasn't that old, but here I feel the 1941 age fits. Marylouise is a great actress and I plan on filling out her page soon with all the details of her career.

i DONT KNOW HOW THIS THING WORKS. BUT I'LL TELL YOU THIS. VERTIGO ACID. CALL ME FAMILY FLUFF. STOP THREATENING ME YOU TIGHT DRY LITTLE PUSSY. I OWN THIS FING CITY. AND I'LL OWN YOUR FING PUNK ASS IF YOU DONT STAY OUT OF MY BUSINESS. CAPICHE?

Name Change Don't know if this is the correct place to post but the main reason I would like my name changed is so my full name is not shown. Thanks.

i enjoyed having your balls in my mouth last night ( ) Thanks

" Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, not a place for you to amuse yourself and your friends with insulting mock articles.  An on the ''run!'' "

Why can't you override 0RR? It was imposed without any consultation on a whim by an overreaching admin who actually had the gall to warn Jimbo Wales as well as me (haha). Editors have informed us that they will no longer watch or contribute to this page because of this imposition, and the only people who like it are the fringe pushers who don't have the good of wikipedia as their highest priority. It sucks. - (resonate)

" Removal of beta service pages/notability issues Hi Henrik I have edited the entry on my father, Keith Lawrence who flew in the Battle of Britain in 1940. He is still alive and I see him every week. As well as knowing his date of birth and his general life history, I have access to his Pilot's Flying Logbook, giving completely accurate information about his time in RAF - but this is not a published document. This information and the Logbook are primary sources, which I have used for the Edits I have done. I have noted several administrative points: (a) It says ""This is very much a beta service and may disappear or change at any time"", presumably because of the low numbers of people viewing the page. (b) ""The topic of this article may not meet the general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. (August 2011)"" My questions are: 1) If I add secondary sources (confirmation of material relating to Keith Lawrence which is in various published books) does that reduce the liklihood of the article being merged, redirected or deleted? Or might it disappear anyway, because it is a 'beta service'? 2) If I spend time adding references and citations to secondary sources, is there a time limit for doing this, please? (For example, 6 months from the August 2011 date mentioned above?) Basically, I would like to know, please, if it is worth me spending time providing secondary sources if the article will be deleted anyway because of the low number of 'hits' the page receives. Thanks, "

" Actually, I'll go ahead and move it. ···? · · Talk to Nihonjoe "

How about if I take a reduced quality screenshot, would that count?

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Square kilometre. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.

W You were right, I forgot about that one. I was a note that I made in the draft about your article and it made its way into the article somehow. Removed now, but I credited you on the talk to.

It is mentioned under 'Interchange formats'

you suck You suck Jpgordon, even if you admins/checkusers find our IPs and block them for long periods of time, all we have to do is press the reset button on our modems and within 5 minutes we would get a new IP and be able to vandalize again. As a result, I hope you admins realize that blocking is useless. That is indeed what I always do when I get blocked. And to save you the time of yet another checkuser, the IP I am using now is 174.91.92.166 and in case you haven't figured it out, I previously used the IP 174.91.97.28 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page;=User%3A174.91.97.28), which was blocked for 3 months yesterday (useless block, it's quite easy to circumvent it).

There are a whole lot more CSDs than those that appear on the log. Notice that I say some appear on the log, that isn't even the start of it. Probably less than 1% of my CSDs were not perfect. If you'd like, I could go through your edit history and talk page and point out every mistake that you have ever made. You need to read the following policies to start WP:AGF, WP:BITE. In your RFA process, it was pointed out that you too misused the CSD tags here here here here and countless other times. So, before you go WP:BITEing a user who is making good-faith edits and making block threats, you should read the policies a bit more clearly and see that you too are not perfect.

You'll be able to edit it when you're account is at least 4 days old with at least 10 edits.

Don't worry, if you put it on your userpage it will stretch automatically to the length of your page template.

LOL! Nice work! Good to see you're being justly regarded with contempt by people who actually care about Wikipedia quality. Thanks for the note on my talk page. Want to go for zero?

Yes, that sounds good.

You guys don't know what the hell you are talking about. I have lived in Georgia for most of my life and it turns out that I don't even know what the city is called. heh, )

Four reverts on Wikipediocracy You seem to have reverted four times now on Wikipediocracy. Perhaps you'd consider self-reverting your last reversion? — (talk)

I have reverted the removal of the information that Newman attended university at an early age as the information should stay in the article unless there is a consensus to the contrary, per WP:BRD.

Incomplete sentence in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna Thanks for catching that! Must have been one of those times when I was working on a couple of parts of the article and saved without finishing them all. It's been fixed.

Accusations of sock puppetry I have just discovered that you have accused me of sock puppetry during my block (well, during what I thought was my block period, actually it was much shorter). Retract your unfounded accusations of sock puppetry.

Why did you remove skinwalker instead of moving it to new characters?

, especially kickstarter-level films, or any indie project that was involved in, could certainly deserve a chance to to find a right sources for them, ya know

Would you be okay if I removed it?

Please Explain Blocking Dear Jamie, Thank you for your hard work to keep Wikipedia accurate and meaningful. Would you have a moment to explain what it is you do there, and the criteria you use?

" RfA thanks! RfA: Many thanks Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. (talk • contribs) "

" HOW DARE YOU, HOW DARE YOU KUBIGULA, HOW DARE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW DARE YOU DELETE BRILLIANT ARTICLE ON NILLIAM ""THE PHENOMENA"" TOWNSIRIS I CAN SENSE A PRESENCE ABOUT YOU BOY, AN EVIL PRESENCE, MAY THE FORCE FROM THE SPIRIT OF A SEAHORSE UNLEASH THE EXPECTO PATRONUM UPON YOU, YOU MUST EXPRESS KINDNESS TO NILLIAM TOWNSIRIS, FOR HE IS OUR SAVIOUR, THE ANSWER TO OUR ULLILOQUITY. IF YOU AS SO MUCH BLINK WHEN READING THE NEXT ARTICLE, THEN YOU WILL JUST MISS OUT THERE TIGER."

lol = Blocked! yeppers! I basically made a fool out of you and Hybrid though. I can't believe you both believed all that sappy garbage I was giving you. I could have kept tricking you as by not confessing then I told my self (make a fool out of them or stay lonelyboy and keep tricking them). I chose makign a fool out of you. While it didn't go necessarily as how I planned. Since, I am leaving for vacation tomorrow morning, I was going to go in and vandalize your pages just before I left, you two were pissing me off so I just gave it away early that I was making a fool out of you two. Basically because you two are so damned gullible and got in some of my other enemies on it, Charlesknight and MathewFenton, I amde a fool out of them two. Anyways, I had some extra editing to do on the pages I liked so I came and made those edits. I really don't need to come here much as there isn't really anything I am interested in. However, when I want to come back after I come back from my vacation, I can do that very easily. Anyway, later suckers. Oh by the way YANDMAN, I love you. lol you dumbass. And Hybrid, you're sweet. LOL, You gullible fatass! Yandman thinks I don't have a static IP address. I am thinking about unhooking it tonight just to come back here tomorrow and vandalize his page to show him what a dumbass he is and how I can come back whenever I feel liek it. D

" It's fascinating how you elamite semitic people have turned the mythology of afghanistan into ""iranian"" mythology!!! I wonder how the òbjective rational`white people have allowed thisÉ"

do it again and you're reported

I already explained to you it wasnt a personal attack and that I really do think everyone knows DMC was sorry for pushing MONGO off wiki, however DMC feels he was doing the right thing with his proposals. For you to come here blocking me is quite a disgusting violation of WP:AGF. I would ask for an apology but I am sure I would not get one. A better method would have been to ask, but I am sure this was alot easier for you. Quite disgusting as I pointed out because I left a message on your talk page explaining and you simply ignored me, real nice.

Bank Reconciliation is Bank reconciliation

Before even thinking about writing an article on yourself, read Wikipedia's guideline on autobiographies. \talk

I guess Kevin Pipe doesn't know what he's talking about. Sad.

Thanks for the check, Chaser. I didn't feel totally ok with that term myself when posting it, but could not think of a better description until you pressed the issue. If anyone wants to change it, I doubt I'll return to it. I do hope the point will stand that the focus on the crash is peripheral.

Its fucking assholes like you who vandalize wikipedia that really grind my gears. Where the fuck do you get off? Huh? Huh? You think this is funny don't you? Well I sacrificed a career and a marriage to keep unconstructive pigs like you from ruining a good thing like Wikipedia; and if I ever get to see my kids again I know they'll thank me for this. You sir are a prick. And what kind of fucking name is 99.135.144.18 anyway? Oh and your user page sucks noob. 24.61.195.2 P.S. You personally, and not your ip are forever banned from Wikipedia

no, I just have not started doing it yet. Have not had the time. Also, trying to decide should not be redirected

totally constructive the section is totally constructive or has some miner errors, but the editios you made point to citations that give opinions from investigators that try to counter the rape accusations, in other words they are nothing more than speculations , it if fine if my name is written along with my speculations about the church without any physical evidence?

The template you linked says flat artworks aren't covered by FoP, which is why it got listed at WP:PUI because I wasn't sure what a mural counted as..

NPOV - I would change this crap, but metalcore is for dipshits -

" Warriors Great job on the warriors page! I'm glad you went ahead and that you were bold abut it, so without further ado... The Original Barnstar Great job on being bold and doing a huge project! Well done! "

We only need to introduce one map for this article, not three This map is better than the animated one because when it's not animated, I don't have to sit and wait to see what the map will eventually tell me. We don't need three different maps to tell us what we want to know about this article.

(UTC) You're the only reasonable person here. 18:39, 25 July 2008

to fix an ambiguation link

Early WWF career Does anybody know where the 1st part of Hennig's WWF career the 1982-1990, lots of its missing, and it only starts at his title loss to the Texas Tornado, in mid 1990.

"::::'''''', i disagree with your statement, many jews would love to buy a house in arab towns - however, an arab who sells his place to a jew would be killed in the center of town (allready happened a number of times). that's why we have the current ridiculous situation in hebron where jews bought a house but the guy who sold it tells the media that he didn't sell it. as for the number of people per room mentioned under this comment, it's only a matter of children per family and customs - an arab person having 8 children might be just as rich as a jewish person who's got 2-3 children, he'll also have more rooms than the jewish guy has since construction is cheeper for arabs. so who is richer? i don't think that the ""people per room"" is much of an indication. "

"::From WP:BLP Talk pages are used to make decisions about article contents. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material not related or useful to making article content choices should be deleted, and even permanently removed (""oversighted"") if especially problematic (telephone number, libel, etc). New material should generally be discussed in order to arrive at a consensus concerning relevance, availability of sources, and reliability of sources. Repeated questionable claims with biographies of living persons issues not based on new evidence can generally be immediately deleted with a reference to where in the archive the prior consensus was reached. (Emphasis added.) Also, you've clearly violated WP:3RR again by removing the hatnotes. — (talk) "

Dab said: My impression remainst that the only reason this article is so long and detailed is the attempt to disguise from the casual reader the fact that the entire thing can be shrugged off in a one-liner. Yes, that's probably true, but what is the alternative? Many of us have been battling to make the CMT clear, but every time a statement is made on how crazy the theory is, the other side asks for a proof/citation. And since that has happened almost every week for the last six months (and probably longer), the article has grown in size. I'm not sure how we can overcome this problem, but I'm open to suggestions.

MENUDO IS GAY! 69.156.179.180 Amadeus! sings that Amadeus song* I'm a jackass, I'm a jackass, I'm a jackass. I'm a jackass, I'm a jackass, I'm a jackass. I'm a jackass, I'm a jackass, I'm a jackass. Oh oh oh oh, I'm a jackass =D 69.156.179.180

except the Gay Republican bit, which is made up)

You know It would be nice if you actually explained why you reverted and also inform him of WP:3RR. (talk · contribs)

You're not an a illeterate. You're an illiterate.

Ed Poor Against my better judgement, but out of courtesy, which I promised to Duk before, I wanted to mention that I mentioned your name again on my talk page.

I smell a rat or uncle Bob Subsections Compared to methylphenidates and Compared to dextromethamphetamine uses the subjective anaylsis of Dr. Bob and single rat studies to support conclusions. Have we not gotten beyond the point where we are going to make conclusions based on a study? Are there reliable citations that support the same information? Some of the observations sound good yet other observations sound off. The first subsection is totally without citation. Can someone give us more information on these subsections?