TheBloke commited on
Commit
f4b2288
1 Parent(s): 2ce96d5

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +14 -14
README.md CHANGED
@@ -74,13 +74,13 @@ So if you're able and willing to contribute, it'd be most gratefully received an
74
  * Patreon: coming soon! (just awaiting approval)
75
  * Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/TheBlokeAI
76
 
77
- # Original model card
78
 
79
  ## WizardLM: An Instruction-following LLM Using Evol-Instruct
80
  Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex Instructions
81
 
82
  <p align="center" width="100%">
83
- <a ><img src="imgs/WizardLM.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 20%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
84
  </p>
85
 
86
  [![Code License](https://img.shields.io/badge/Code%20License-Apache_2.0-green.svg)](https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca/blob/main/LICENSE)
@@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ At present, our core contributors are preparing the **33B** version and we expec
103
 
104
  ### GPT-4 automatic evaluation
105
 
106
- We adopt the automatic evaluation framework based on GPT-4 proposed by FastChat to assess the performance of chatbot models. As shown in the following figure, WizardLM-13B achieved better results than Vicuna-13b.
107
  <p align="center" width="100%">
108
- <a ><img src="imgs/WizarLM13b-GPT4.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 100%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
109
  </p>
110
 
111
  ### WizardLM-13B performance on different skills.
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ We adopt the automatic evaluation framework based on GPT-4 proposed by FastChat
113
  The following figure compares WizardLM-13B and ChatGPT’s skill on Evol-Instruct testset. The result indicates that WizardLM-13B achieves 89.1% of ChatGPT’s performance on average, with almost 100% (or more than) capacity on 10 skills, and more than 90% capacity on 22 skills.
114
 
115
  <p align="center" width="100%">
116
- <a ><img src="imgs/evol-testset_skills-13b.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 100%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
117
  </p>
118
 
119
  ## Call for Feedbacks
@@ -132,11 +132,11 @@ We just sample some cases to demonstrate the performance of WizardLM and ChatGPT
132
  [Evol-Instruct](https://github.com/nlpxucan/evol-instruct) is a novel method using LLMs instead of humans to automatically mass-produce open-domain instructions of various difficulty levels and skills range, to improve the performance of LLMs.
133
 
134
  <p align="center" width="100%">
135
- <a ><img src="imgs/git_overall.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 86%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
136
  </p>
137
 
138
  <p align="center" width="100%">
139
- <a ><img src="imgs/git_running.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 86%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
140
  </p>
141
 
142
  ## Contents
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ This JSON file is a list of dictionaries, each dictionary contains the following
184
  We release [WizardLM] weights as delta weights to comply with the LLaMA model license.
185
  You can add our delta to the original LLaMA weights to obtain the WizardLM weights. Instructions:
186
  1. Get the original LLaMA weights in the huggingface format by following the instructions [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/model_doc/llama).
187
- 2. Please download our delta model at the following [link](https://huggingface.co/victor123/WizardLM)
188
  3. Use the following scripts to get WizardLM weights by applying our delta:
189
  ```
190
  python src/weight_diff_wizard.py recover --path_raw <path_to_step_1_dir> --path_diff <path_to_step_2_dir> --path_tuned <path_to_store_recovered_weights>
@@ -247,16 +247,16 @@ python src\inference_wizardlm.py
247
 
248
  ### Evaluation
249
 
250
- To evaluate Wizard, we conduct human evaluation on the inputs from our human instruct evaluation set [`WizardLM_testset.jsonl`](./data/WizardLM_testset.jsonl) . This evaluation set was collected by the authors and covers a diverse list of user-oriented instructions including difficult Coding Generation & Debugging, Math, Reasoning, Complex Formats, Academic Writing, Extensive Disciplines, and so on. We performed a blind pairwise comparison between Wizard and baselines. Specifically, we recruit 10 well-educated annotators to rank the models from 1 to 5 on relevance, knowledgeable, reasoning, calculation and accuracy.
251
 
252
- WizardLM achieved significantly better results than Alpaca and Vicuna-7b.
253
  <p align="center" width="60%">
254
- <a ><img src="imgs/win.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 60%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
255
  </p>
256
 
257
  In the high-difficulty section of our test set (difficulty level >= 8), WizardLM even outperforms ChatGPT, with a win rate 7.9% larger than Chatgpt (42.9% vs. 35.0%). This indicates that our method can significantly improve the ability of large language models to handle complex instructions.
258
  <p align="center" width="60%">
259
- <a ><img src="imgs/windiff.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 60%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
260
  </p>
261
 
262
  ### Citation
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ Please cite the repo if you use the data or code in this repo.
265
 
266
  ```
267
  @misc{xu2023wizardlm,
268
- title={WizardLM: Empowering Large Language Models to Follow Complex Instructions},
269
  author={Can Xu and Qingfeng Sun and Kai Zheng and Xiubo Geng and Pu Zhao and Jiazhan Feng and Chongyang Tao and Daxin Jiang},
270
  year={2023},
271
  eprint={2304.12244},
@@ -275,4 +275,4 @@ Please cite the repo if you use the data or code in this repo.
275
  ```
276
  ## Disclaimer
277
 
278
- The resources, including code, data, and model weights, associated with this project are restricted for academic research purposes only and cannot be used for commercial purposes. The content produced by any version of WizardLM is influenced by uncontrollable variables such as randomness, and therefore, the accuracy of the output cannot be guaranteed by this project. This project does not accept any legal liability for the content of the model output, nor does it assume responsibility for any losses incurred due to the use of associated resources and output results.
 
74
  * Patreon: coming soon! (just awaiting approval)
75
  * Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/TheBlokeAI
76
 
77
+ # Original model card: WizardLM 13B 1.0
78
 
79
  ## WizardLM: An Instruction-following LLM Using Evol-Instruct
80
  Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex Instructions
81
 
82
  <p align="center" width="100%">
83
+ <a ><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/main/imgs/WizardLM.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 20%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
84
  </p>
85
 
86
  [![Code License](https://img.shields.io/badge/Code%20License-Apache_2.0-green.svg)](https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca/blob/main/LICENSE)
 
103
 
104
  ### GPT-4 automatic evaluation
105
 
106
+ We adopt the automatic evaluation framework based on GPT-4 proposed by FastChat to assess the performance of chatbot models. As shown in the following figure, WizardLM-13B achieved better results than Vicuna-13b.
107
  <p align="center" width="100%">
108
+ <a ><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/main/imgs/WizarLM13b-GPT4.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 100%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
109
  </p>
110
 
111
  ### WizardLM-13B performance on different skills.
 
113
  The following figure compares WizardLM-13B and ChatGPT’s skill on Evol-Instruct testset. The result indicates that WizardLM-13B achieves 89.1% of ChatGPT’s performance on average, with almost 100% (or more than) capacity on 10 skills, and more than 90% capacity on 22 skills.
114
 
115
  <p align="center" width="100%">
116
+ <a ><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/main/imgs/evol-testset_skills-13b.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 100%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
117
  </p>
118
 
119
  ## Call for Feedbacks
 
132
  [Evol-Instruct](https://github.com/nlpxucan/evol-instruct) is a novel method using LLMs instead of humans to automatically mass-produce open-domain instructions of various difficulty levels and skills range, to improve the performance of LLMs.
133
 
134
  <p align="center" width="100%">
135
+ <a ><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/main/imgs/git_overall.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 86%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
136
  </p>
137
 
138
  <p align="center" width="100%">
139
+ <a ><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/main/imgs/git_running.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 86%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
140
  </p>
141
 
142
  ## Contents
 
184
  We release [WizardLM] weights as delta weights to comply with the LLaMA model license.
185
  You can add our delta to the original LLaMA weights to obtain the WizardLM weights. Instructions:
186
  1. Get the original LLaMA weights in the huggingface format by following the instructions [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/model_doc/llama).
187
+ 2. Please download our delta model at the following [link](https://huggingface.co/victor123/WizardLM)
188
  3. Use the following scripts to get WizardLM weights by applying our delta:
189
  ```
190
  python src/weight_diff_wizard.py recover --path_raw <path_to_step_1_dir> --path_diff <path_to_step_2_dir> --path_tuned <path_to_store_recovered_weights>
 
247
 
248
  ### Evaluation
249
 
250
+ To evaluate Wizard, we conduct human evaluation on the inputs from our human instruct evaluation set [`WizardLM_testset.jsonl`](./data/WizardLM_testset.jsonl) . This evaluation set was collected by the authors and covers a diverse list of user-oriented instructions including difficult Coding Generation & Debugging, Math, Reasoning, Complex Formats, Academic Writing, Extensive Disciplines, and so on. We performed a blind pairwise comparison between Wizard and baselines. Specifically, we recruit 10 well-educated annotators to rank the models from 1 to 5 on relevance, knowledgeable, reasoning, calculation and accuracy.
251
 
252
+ WizardLM achieved significantly better results than Alpaca and Vicuna-7b.
253
  <p align="center" width="60%">
254
+ <a ><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/main/imgs/win.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 60%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
255
  </p>
256
 
257
  In the high-difficulty section of our test set (difficulty level >= 8), WizardLM even outperforms ChatGPT, with a win rate 7.9% larger than Chatgpt (42.9% vs. 35.0%). This indicates that our method can significantly improve the ability of large language models to handle complex instructions.
258
  <p align="center" width="60%">
259
+ <a ><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/main/imgs/windiff.png" alt="WizardLM" style="width: 60%; min-width: 300px; display: block; margin: auto;"></a>
260
  </p>
261
 
262
  ### Citation
 
265
 
266
  ```
267
  @misc{xu2023wizardlm,
268
+ title={WizardLM: Empowering Large Language Models to Follow Complex Instructions},
269
  author={Can Xu and Qingfeng Sun and Kai Zheng and Xiubo Geng and Pu Zhao and Jiazhan Feng and Chongyang Tao and Daxin Jiang},
270
  year={2023},
271
  eprint={2304.12244},
 
275
  ```
276
  ## Disclaimer
277
 
278
+ The resources, including code, data, and model weights, associated with this project are restricted for academic research purposes only and cannot be used for commercial purposes. The content produced by any version of WizardLM is influenced by uncontrollable variables such as randomness, and therefore, the accuracy of the output cannot be guaranteed by this project. This project does not accept any legal liability for the content of the model output, nor does it assume responsibility for any losses incurred due to the use of associated resources and output results.