--- license: apache-2.0 datasets: - BAAI/IndustryInstruction_Artificial-Intelligence base_model: - meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct --- This model is finetuned on the model llama3.1-8b-instruct using the dataset [BAAI/IndustryInstruction_Artificial-Intelligence](https://huggingface.co/datasets/BAAI/IndustryInstruction_Artificial-Intelligence) dataset, the dataset details can jump to the repo: [BAAI/IndustryInstruction](https://huggingface.co/datasets/BAAI/IndustryInstruction) ## training params The training framework is llama-factory, template=llama3 ``` learning_rate=1e-5 lr_scheduler_type=cosine max_length=2048 warmup_ratio=0.05 batch_size=64 epoch=10 ``` select best ckpt by the evaluation loss ## evaluation Duto to there is no evaluation benchmark, we can not eval the model ## How to use ```python # !/usr/bin/env python # -*- coding:utf-8 -*- # ================================================================== # [Author] : xiaofeng # [Descriptions] : # ================================================================== from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM import transformers import torch llama3_jinja = """{% if messages[0]['role'] == 'system' %} {% set offset = 1 %} {% else %} {% set offset = 0 %} {% endif %} {{ bos_token }} {% for message in messages %} {% if (message['role'] == 'user') != (loop.index0 % 2 == offset) %} {{ raise_exception('Conversation roles must alternate user/assistant/user/assistant/...') }} {% endif %} {{ '<|start_header_id|>' + message['role'] + '<|end_header_id|>\n\n' + message['content'] | trim + '<|eot_id|>' }} {% endfor %} {% if add_generation_prompt %} {{ '<|start_header_id|>' + 'assistant' + '<|end_header_id|>\n\n' }} {% endif %}""" dtype = torch.bfloat16 model_dir = "MonteXiaofeng/Artificial-llama3_1_8B_instruct" model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( model_dir, device_map="cuda", torch_dtype=dtype, ) tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_dir) tokenizer.chat_template = llama3_jinja # update template message = [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant"}, { "role": "user", "content": "请解释为什么ChatGPT的英文输出结果的逻辑性和准确性远大于中文结果?", }, ] prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( message, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True ) print(prompt) inputs = tokenizer.encode(prompt, add_special_tokens=False, return_tensors="pt") prompt_length = len(inputs[0]) print(f"prompt_length:{prompt_length}") generating_args = { "do_sample": True, "temperature": 1.0, "top_p": 0.5, "top_k": 15, "max_new_tokens": 512, } generate_output = model.generate(input_ids=inputs.to(model.device), **generating_args) response_ids = generate_output[:, prompt_length:] response = tokenizer.batch_decode( response_ids, skip_special_tokens=True, clean_up_tokenization_spaces=True )[0] print(f"response:{response}") """ ChatGPT的英文输出结果的逻辑性和准确性远大于中文结果的原因可能是因为以下几点:首先,ChatGPT的训练数据主要来自英文互联网上的大量文本,因此它在处理英文语言时具有更强的能力。其次,英文语言的语法和词汇结构相对简单,容易被ChatGPT理解和生成。此外,ChatGPT的算法优化也可能更适合处理英文语言。然而,对于中文语言,由于其复杂的语法结构和大量的非字节字符,ChatGPT可能难以完全理解和生成准确的中文结果。 """ ```