---
license: apache-2.0
library_name: generic
tags:
- text2text-generation
- punctuation
- sentence-boundary-detection
- truecasing
- true-casing
language:
- af
- am
- ar
- bg
- bn
- de
- el
- en
- es
- et
- fa
- fi
- fr
- gu
- hi
- hr
- hu
- id
- is
- it
- ja
- kk
- kn
- ko
- ky
- lt
- lv
- mk
- ml
- mr
- nl
- or
- pa
- pl
- ps
- pt
- ro
- ru
- rw
- so
- sr
- sw
- ta
- te
- tr
- uk
- zh
---
# Model Overview
This is an `xlm-roberta` fine-tuned to restore punctuation, true-case (capitalize),
and detect sentence boundaries (full stops) in 47 languages.
# Usage
The easiest way to use this model is to install [punctuators](https://github.com/1-800-BAD-CODE/punctuators):
```bash
$ pip install punctuators
```
Though this is just an ONNX and SentencePiece model, so you may run it as you wish.
The input to the `punctuators` API is a list (batch) of strings.
Each string will be punctuated, true-cased, and segmented on predicted full stops.
The output will therefore be a list of list of strings: one list of segmented sentences per input text.
To disable full stops, use `m.infer(texts, apply_sbd=False)`.
The output will then be a list of strings: one punctuated, true-cased string per input text.
Example Usage
```python
from typing import List
from punctuators.models import PunctCapSegModelONNX
m: PunctCapSegModelONNX = PunctCapSegModelONNX.from_pretrained(
"1-800-BAD-CODE/xlm-roberta_punctuation_fullstop_truecase"
)
input_texts: List[str] = [
"hola mundo cómo estás estamos bajo el sol y hace mucho calor santa coloma abre los huertos urbanos a las escuelas de la ciudad",
"hello friend how's it going it's snowing outside right now in connecticut a large storm is moving in",
"未來疫苗將有望覆蓋3歲以上全年齡段美國與北約軍隊已全部撤離還有鐵路公路在內的各項基建的來源都將枯竭",
"በባለፈው ሳምንት ኢትዮጵያ ከሶማሊያ 3 ሺህ ወታደሮቿንም እንዳስወጣች የሶማሊያው ዳልሳን ሬድዮ ዘግቦ ነበር ጸጥታ ሃይሉና ህዝቡ ተቀናጅቶ በመስራቱ በመዲናዋ ላይ የታቀደው የጥፋት ሴራ ከሽፏል",
"こんにちは友人" "調子はどう" "今日は雨の日でしたね" "乾いた状態を保つために一日中室内で過ごしました",
"hallo freund wie geht's es war heute ein regnerischer tag nicht wahr ich verbrachte den tag drinnen um trocken zu bleiben",
"हैलो दोस्त ये कैसा चल रहा है आज बारिश का दिन था न मैंने सूखा रहने के लिए दिन घर के अंदर बिताया",
"كيف تجري الامور كان يومًا ممطرًا اليوم أليس كذلك قضيت اليوم في الداخل لأظل جافًا",
]
results: List[List[str]] = m.infer(
texts=input_texts, apply_sbd=True,
)
for input_text, output_texts in zip(input_texts, results):
print(f"Input: {input_text}")
print(f"Outputs:")
for text in output_texts:
print(f"\t{text}")
print()
```
Expected output
```text
Input: hola mundo cómo estás estamos bajo el sol y hace mucho calor santa coloma abre los huertos urbanos a las escuelas de la ciudad
Outputs:
Hola mundo, ¿cómo estás?
Estamos bajo el sol y hace mucho calor.
Santa Coloma abre los huertos urbanos a las escuelas de la ciudad.
Input: hello friend how's it going it's snowing outside right now in connecticut a large storm is moving in
Outputs:
Hello friend, how's it going?
It's snowing outside right now.
In Connecticut, a large storm is moving in.
Input: 未來疫苗將有望覆蓋3歲以上全年齡段美國與北約軍隊已全部撤離還有鐵路公路在內的各項基建的來源都將枯竭
Outputs:
未來，疫苗將有望覆蓋3歲以上全年齡段。
美國與北約軍隊已全部撤離。
還有，鐵路，公路在內的各項基建的來源都將枯竭。
Input: በባለፈው ሳምንት ኢትዮጵያ ከሶማሊያ 3 ሺህ ወታደሮቿንም እንዳስወጣች የሶማሊያው ዳልሳን ሬድዮ ዘግቦ ነበር ጸጥታ ሃይሉና ህዝቡ ተቀናጅቶ በመስራቱ በመዲናዋ ላይ የታቀደው የጥፋት ሴራ ከሽፏል
Outputs:
በባለፈው ሳምንት ኢትዮጵያ ከሶማሊያ 3 ሺህ ወታደሮቿንም እንዳስወጣች የሶማሊያው ዳልሳን ሬድዮ ዘግቦ ነበር።
ጸጥታ ሃይሉና ህዝቡ ተቀናጅቶ በመስራቱ በመዲናዋ ላይ የታቀደው የጥፋት ሴራ ከሽፏል።
Input: こんにちは友人調子はどう今日は雨の日でしたね乾いた状態を保つために一日中室内で過ごしました
Outputs:
こんにちは、友人、調子はどう？
今日は雨の日でしたね。
乾いた状態を保つために、一日中、室内で過ごしました。
Input: hallo freund wie geht's es war heute ein regnerischer tag nicht wahr ich verbrachte den tag drinnen um trocken zu bleiben
Outputs:
Hallo Freund, wie geht's?
Es war heute ein regnerischer Tag, nicht wahr?
Ich verbrachte den Tag drinnen, um trocken zu bleiben.
Input: हैलो दोस्त ये कैसा चल रहा है आज बारिश का दिन था न मैंने सूखा रहने के लिए दिन घर के अंदर बिताया
Outputs:
हैलो दोस्त, ये कैसा चल रहा है?
आज बारिश का दिन था न, मैंने सूखा रहने के लिए दिन घर के अंदर बिताया।
Input: كيف تجري الامور كان يومًا ممطرًا اليوم أليس كذلك قضيت اليوم في الداخل لأظل جافًا
Outputs:
كيف تجري الامور؟
كان يومًا ممطرًا اليوم، أليس كذلك؟
قضيت اليوم في الداخل لأظل جافًا.
```
# Model Architecture
This model implements the following graph, which allows punctuation, true-casing, and fullstop prediction
in every language without language-specific behavior:
We start by tokenizing the text and encoding it with XLM-Roberta, which is the pre-trained portion of this graph.
Then we predict punctuation before and after every subtoken.
Predicting before each token allows for Spanish inverted question marks.
Predicting after every token allows for all other punctuation, including punctuation within continuous-script
languages and acronyms.
We use embeddings to represent the predicted punctuation tokens to inform the sentence boundary head of the
punctuation that'll be inserted into the text. This allows proper full stop prediction, since certain punctuation
tokens (periods, questions marks, etc.) are strongly correlated with sentence boundaries.
We then shift full stop predictions to the right by one, to inform the true-casing head of where the beginning
of each new sentence is. This is important since true-casing is strongly correlated to sentence boundaries.
For true-casing, we predict `N` predictions per subtoken, where `N` is the number of characters in the subtoken.
In practice, `N` is the maximum subtoken length and extra predictions are ignored. Essentially, true-casing is
modeled as a multi-label problem. This allows for upper-casing arbitrary characters, e.g., "NATO", "MacDonald", "mRNA", etc.
Applying all these predictions to the input text, we can punctuate, true-case, and split sentences in any language.
## Tokenizer
Instead of the hacky wrapper used by FairSeq and strangely ported (not fixed) by HuggingFace, the `xlm-roberta` SentencePiece model was adjusted to correctly encode
the text. Per HF's comments,
```python
# Original fairseq vocab and spm vocab must be "aligned":
# Vocab | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
# -------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----
# fairseq | '' | '' | '' | '' | ',' | '.' | '▁' | 's' | '▁de' | '-'
# spm | '' | '' | '' | ',' | '.' | '▁' | 's' | '▁de' | '-' | '▁a'
```
The SP model was un-hacked with the following snippet
(SentencePiece experts, let me know if there is a problem here):
```python
from sentencepiece import SentencePieceProcessor
from sentencepiece.sentencepiece_model_pb2 import ModelProto
m = ModelProto()
m.ParseFromString(open("/path/to/xlmroberta/sentencepiece.bpe.model", "rb").read())
pieces = list(m.pieces)
pieces = (
[
ModelProto.SentencePiece(piece="", type=ModelProto.SentencePiece.Type.CONTROL),
ModelProto.SentencePiece(piece="", type=ModelProto.SentencePiece.Type.CONTROL),
ModelProto.SentencePiece(piece="", type=ModelProto.SentencePiece.Type.CONTROL),
ModelProto.SentencePiece(piece="", type=ModelProto.SentencePiece.Type.UNKNOWN),
]
+ pieces[3:]
+ [ModelProto.SentencePiece(piece="", type=ModelProto.SentencePiece.Type.USER_DEFINED)]
)
del m.pieces[:]
m.pieces.extend(pieces)
with open("/path/to/new/sp.model", "wb") as f:
f.write(m.SerializeToString())
```
Now we can use just the SP model without a wrapper.
## Post-Punctuation Tokens
This model predicts the following set of punctuation tokens after each subtoken:
| Token | Description | Relevant Languages |
| ---: | :---------- | :----------- |
| \ | No punctuation | All |
| \ | Every character in this subword is followed by a period | Primarily English, some European |
| . | Latin full stop | Many |
| , | Latin comma | Many |
| ? | Latin question mark | Many |
| ？ | Full-width question mark | Chinese, Japanese |
| ， | Full-width comma | Chinese, Japanese |
| 。 | Full-width full stop | Chinese, Japanese |
| 、 | Ideographic comma | Chinese, Japanese |
| ・ | Middle dot | Japanese |
| । | Danda | Hindi, Bengali, Oriya |
| ؟ | Arabic question mark | Arabic |
| ; | Greek question mark | Greek |
| ። | Ethiopic full stop | Amharic |
| ፣ | Ethiopic comma | Amharic |
| ፧ | Ethiopic question mark | Amharic |
## Pre-Punctuation Tokens
This model predicts the following set of punctuation tokens before each subword:
| Token | Description | Relevant Languages |
| ---: | :---------- | :----------- |
| \ | No punctuation | All |
| ¿ | Inverted question mark | Spanish |
# Training Details
This model was trained in the NeMo framework.
This model was trained on an A100 for approximately 9 hours.
## Training Data
This model was trained with News Crawl data from WMT.
1M lines of text for each language was used, except for a few low-resource languages which may have used less.
Languages were chosen based on whether the News Crawl corpus contained enough reliable-quality data as judged by the author.
# Limitations
## Sentence Boundaries / Fullstops
Fullstop (sentence boundary) detection is near-perfect with news data, but misses obvious sentence boundaries
when several short sentences appear contiguously.
With News crawl, SBD F1 is > 99.5%. With OpenSubtitles, SBD F1 drops unacceptably to < 90%.
When I figure out why this is, I'll fine-tune the SBD head. It's likely due to pre-processing and domain mis-match.
## Domain
This model was trained on news data, and may not perform well on conversational or informal data. Notably,
when presented with many short sentences, the model misses obvious sentence boundaries since the model was
trained on relatively-long sentences.
## Quality
Further, this model is unlikely to be of production quality.
It was trained with "only" 1M lines per language, and the dev sets may have been noisy due to the nature of web-scraped news data.
## Excessive Predictions
This model over-predicts Spanish question marks, especially the inverted question mark `¿` (see metrics below).
Since `¿` is a rare token, especially in the context of a 47-language model, Spanish questions were over-sampled
by selecting more of these sentences from additional training data that was not used. However, this seems to have
"over-corrected" the problem and a lot of Spanish question marks are predicted.
The model may also over-predict commas.
# Evaluation
In these metrics, keep in mind that
1. The data is noisy
2. Sentence boundaries and true-casing are conditioned on predicted punctuation, which is the most difficult task and sometimes incorrect.
When conditioning on reference punctuation, true-casing and SBD is practically 100% for most languages.
4. Punctuation can be subjective. E.g.,
`Hola mundo, ¿cómo estás?`
or
`Hola mundo. ¿Cómo estás?`
When the sentences are longer and more practical, these ambiguities abound and affect all 3 analytics.
## Test Data and Example Generation
Each test example was generated using the following procedure:
1. Concatenate 11 random sentences (1 + 10 for each sentence in the test set)
2. Lower-case the concatenated sentence
3. Remove all punctuation
Targets are generated as we lower-case letters and remove punctuation.
The data is a held-out portion of News Crawl, which has been deduplicated.
3,000 lines of data per language was used, generating 3,000 unique examples of 11 sentences each.
We generate 3,000 examples, where example `i` begins with sentence `i` and is followed by 10 random
sentences selected from the 3,000 sentence test set.
For measuring true-casing and sentence boundary detection, reference punctuation tokens were used for
conditioning (see graph above). If we use predicted punctuation instead, then incorrect punctuation will
result in true-casing and SBD targets not aligning correctly and these metrics will be artificially low.
## Selected Language Evaluation Reports
For now, metrics for a few selected languages are shown below.
Given the amount of work required to collect and pretty-print metrics in 47 languages, I'll add more eventually.
Expand any of the following tabs to see metrics for that language.
English
```text
punct_post test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.25 98.43 98.84 564908
(label_id: 1) 63.14 84.67 72.33 613
. (label_id: 2) 90.97 93.91 92.42 32040
, (label_id: 3) 73.95 84.32 78.79 24271
? (label_id: 4) 79.05 81.94 80.47 1041
？ (label_id: 5) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
， (label_id: 6) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
。 (label_id: 7) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
、 (label_id: 8) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
・ (label_id: 9) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
। (label_id: 10) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
؟ (label_id: 11) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
، (label_id: 12) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
; (label_id: 13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
። (label_id: 14) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፣ (label_id: 15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፧ (label_id: 16) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
-------------------
micro avg 97.60 97.60 97.60 622873
macro avg 81.27 88.65 84.57 622873
weighted avg 97.77 97.60 97.67 622873
```
```
cap test report:
label precision recall f1 support
LOWER (label_id: 0) 99.72 99.85 99.78 2134956
UPPER (label_id: 1) 96.33 93.52 94.91 91996
-------------------
micro avg 99.59 99.59 99.59 2226952
macro avg 98.03 96.68 97.34 2226952
weighted avg 99.58 99.59 99.58 2226952
```
```
seg test report:
label precision recall f1 support
NOSTOP (label_id: 0) 99.99 99.98 99.99 591540
FULLSTOP (label_id: 1) 99.61 99.89 99.75 34333
-------------------
micro avg 99.97 99.97 99.97 625873
macro avg 99.80 99.93 99.87 625873
weighted avg 99.97 99.97 99.97 625873
```
Spanish
```text
punct_pre test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.94 99.89 99.92 636941
¿ (label_id: 1) 56.73 71.35 63.20 1288
-------------------
micro avg 99.83 99.83 99.83 638229
macro avg 78.34 85.62 81.56 638229
weighted avg 99.85 99.83 99.84 638229
```
```
punct_post test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.19 98.41 98.80 578271
(label_id: 1) 30.10 56.36 39.24 55
. (label_id: 2) 91.92 93.12 92.52 30856
, (label_id: 3) 72.98 82.44 77.42 27761
? (label_id: 4) 52.77 71.85 60.85 1286
？ (label_id: 5) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
， (label_id: 6) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
。 (label_id: 7) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
、 (label_id: 8) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
・ (label_id: 9) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
। (label_id: 10) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
؟ (label_id: 11) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
، (label_id: 12) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
; (label_id: 13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
። (label_id: 14) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፣ (label_id: 15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፧ (label_id: 16) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
-------------------
micro avg 97.40 97.40 97.40 638229
macro avg 69.39 80.44 73.77 638229
weighted avg 97.60 97.40 97.48 638229
```
```
cap test report:
label precision recall f1 support
LOWER (label_id: 0) 99.82 99.86 99.84 2324724
UPPER (label_id: 1) 95.92 94.70 95.30 79266
-------------------
micro avg 99.69 99.69 99.69 2403990
macro avg 97.87 97.28 97.57 2403990
weighted avg 99.69 99.69 99.69 2403990
```
```
seg test report:
label precision recall f1 support
NOSTOP (label_id: 0) 99.99 99.96 99.98 607057
FULLSTOP (label_id: 1) 99.31 99.88 99.60 34172
-------------------
micro avg 99.96 99.96 99.96 641229
macro avg 99.65 99.92 99.79 641229
weighted avg 99.96 99.96 99.96 641229
```
Amharic
```text
punct_post test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.83 99.28 99.56 729664
(label_id: 1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
. (label_id: 2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
, (label_id: 3) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
? (label_id: 4) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
？ (label_id: 5) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
， (label_id: 6) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
。 (label_id: 7) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
、 (label_id: 8) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
・ (label_id: 9) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
। (label_id: 10) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
؟ (label_id: 11) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
، (label_id: 12) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
; (label_id: 13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
። (label_id: 14) 91.27 97.90 94.47 25341
፣ (label_id: 15) 61.93 82.11 70.60 5818
፧ (label_id: 16) 67.41 81.73 73.89 1177
-------------------
micro avg 99.08 99.08 99.08 762000
macro avg 80.11 90.26 84.63 762000
weighted avg 99.21 99.08 99.13 762000
```
```
cap test report:
label precision recall f1 support
LOWER (label_id: 0) 98.40 98.03 98.21 1064
UPPER (label_id: 1) 71.23 75.36 73.24 69
-------------------
micro avg 96.65 96.65 96.65 1133
macro avg 84.81 86.69 85.73 1133
weighted avg 96.74 96.65 96.69 1133
```
```
seg test report:
label precision recall f1 support
NOSTOP (label_id: 0) 99.99 99.85 99.92 743158
FULLSTOP (label_id: 1) 95.20 99.62 97.36 21842
-------------------
micro avg 99.85 99.85 99.85 765000
macro avg 97.59 99.74 98.64 765000
weighted avg 99.85 99.85 99.85 765000
```
Chinese
```text
punct_post test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.53 97.31 98.41 435611
(label_id: 1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
. (label_id: 2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
, (label_id: 3) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
? (label_id: 4) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
？ (label_id: 5) 81.85 87.31 84.49 1513
， (label_id: 6) 74.08 93.67 82.73 35921
。 (label_id: 7) 96.51 96.93 96.72 32097
、 (label_id: 8) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
・ (label_id: 9) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
। (label_id: 10) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
؟ (label_id: 11) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
، (label_id: 12) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
; (label_id: 13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
። (label_id: 14) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፣ (label_id: 15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፧ (label_id: 16) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
-------------------
micro avg 97.00 97.00 97.00 505142
macro avg 87.99 93.81 90.59 505142
weighted avg 97.48 97.00 97.15 505142
```
```
cap test report:
label precision recall f1 support
LOWER (label_id: 0) 94.89 94.98 94.94 2951
UPPER (label_id: 1) 81.34 81.03 81.18 796
-------------------
micro avg 92.02 92.02 92.02 3747
macro avg 88.11 88.01 88.06 3747
weighted avg 92.01 92.02 92.01 3747
```
```
seg test report:
label precision recall f1 support
NOSTOP (label_id: 0) 99.99 99.97 99.98 473642
FULLSTOP (label_id: 1) 99.55 99.90 99.72 34500
-------------------
micro avg 99.96 99.96 99.96 508142
macro avg 99.77 99.93 99.85 508142
weighted avg 99.96 99.96 99.96 508142
```
Japanese
```text
punct_post test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.34 95.90 97.59 406341
(label_id: 1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
. (label_id: 2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
, (label_id: 3) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
? (label_id: 4) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
？ (label_id: 5) 70.55 73.56 72.02 1456
， (label_id: 6) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
。 (label_id: 7) 94.38 96.95 95.65 32537
、 (label_id: 8) 54.28 87.62 67.03 18610
・ (label_id: 9) 28.18 71.64 40.45 1100
। (label_id: 10) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
؟ (label_id: 11) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
، (label_id: 12) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
; (label_id: 13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
። (label_id: 14) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፣ (label_id: 15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፧ (label_id: 16) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
-------------------
micro avg 95.51 95.51 95.51 460044
macro avg 69.35 85.13 74.55 460044
weighted avg 96.91 95.51 96.00 460044
```
```
cap test report:
label precision recall f1 support
LOWER (label_id: 0) 92.33 94.03 93.18 4174
UPPER (label_id: 1) 83.51 79.46 81.43 1587
-------------------
micro avg 90.02 90.02 90.02 5761
macro avg 87.92 86.75 87.30 5761
weighted avg 89.90 90.02 89.94 5761
```
```
seg test report:
label precision recall f1 support
NOSTOP (label_id: 0) 99.99 99.92 99.96 428544
FULLSTOP (label_id: 1) 99.07 99.87 99.47 34500
-------------------
micro avg 99.92 99.92 99.92 463044
macro avg 99.53 99.90 99.71 463044
weighted avg 99.92 99.92 99.92 463044
```
Hindi
```text
punct_post test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.75 99.44 99.59 560358
(label_id: 1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
. (label_id: 2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
, (label_id: 3) 69.55 78.48 73.75 8084
? (label_id: 4) 63.30 87.07 73.31 317
？ (label_id: 5) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
， (label_id: 6) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
。 (label_id: 7) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
、 (label_id: 8) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
・ (label_id: 9) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
। (label_id: 10) 96.92 98.66 97.78 32118
؟ (label_id: 11) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
، (label_id: 12) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
; (label_id: 13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
። (label_id: 14) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፣ (label_id: 15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፧ (label_id: 16) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
-------------------
micro avg 99.11 99.11 99.11 600877
macro avg 82.38 90.91 86.11 600877
weighted avg 99.17 99.11 99.13 600877
```
```
cap test report:
label precision recall f1 support
LOWER (label_id: 0) 97.19 96.72 96.95 2466
UPPER (label_id: 1) 89.14 90.60 89.86 734
-------------------
micro avg 95.31 95.31 95.31 3200
macro avg 93.17 93.66 93.41 3200
weighted avg 95.34 95.31 95.33 3200
```
```
seg test report:
label precision recall f1 support
NOSTOP (label_id: 0) 100.00 99.99 99.99 569472
FULLSTOP (label_id: 1) 99.82 99.99 99.91 34405
-------------------
micro avg 99.99 99.99 99.99 603877
macro avg 99.91 99.99 99.95 603877
weighted avg 99.99 99.99 99.99 603877
```
Arabic
```text
punct_post test report:
label precision recall f1 support
(label_id: 0) 99.30 96.94 98.10 688043
(label_id: 1) 93.33 77.78 84.85 18
. (label_id: 2) 93.31 93.78 93.54 28175
, (label_id: 3) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
? (label_id: 4) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
？ (label_id: 5) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
， (label_id: 6) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
。 (label_id: 7) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
、 (label_id: 8) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
・ (label_id: 9) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
। (label_id: 10) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
؟ (label_id: 11) 65.93 82.79 73.40 860
، (label_id: 12) 44.89 79.20 57.30 20941
; (label_id: 13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
። (label_id: 14) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፣ (label_id: 15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
፧ (label_id: 16) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
-------------------
micro avg 96.29 96.29 96.29 738037
macro avg 79.35 86.10 81.44 738037
weighted avg 97.49 96.29 96.74 738037
```
```
cap test report:
label precision recall f1 support
LOWER (label_id: 0) 97.10 99.49 98.28 4137
UPPER (label_id: 1) 98.71 92.89 95.71 1729
-------------------
micro avg 97.55 97.55 97.55 5866
macro avg 97.90 96.19 96.99 5866
weighted avg 97.57 97.55 97.52 5866
```
```
seg test report:
label precision recall f1 support
NOSTOP (label_id: 0) 99.99 99.97 99.98 710456
FULLSTOP (label_id: 1) 99.39 99.85 99.62 30581
-------------------
micro avg 99.97 99.97 99.97 741037
macro avg 99.69 99.91 99.80 741037
weighted avg 99.97 99.97 99.97 741037
```